Re: Closing the antecedent
- From: William Elliot <marsh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 28 May 2006 19:16:32 -0700
On Sun, 28 May 2006, John Jones wrote:
Realism and anti-realism, the 'external' world and 'inner' world, areNo problem, surrealism is better than both realism and anti-realism.
alike in that neither of these philosophies can support as necessities
the notions of order and disorder, or their related notions such as
antecedence, sequence, beginning, end, randomness, probability and
chaos. Nor can logic and mathematics provide us with any examples. Any
demonstration of these notions can be reformulated in a such way that
renders them impotent. For example, if I speak and you reply,
antecedence and sequence are eliminated as a 'communication'. Events,
any event, such as the creation of the universe, are closed or opened,
not started, begun or finished.
We are forced, if we wish to retain these concepts, to find a
framework, theory or philosophy that can support them. It would be a
mark of a greater philosophy not to do so.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Closing the antecedent
- From: John Jones
- Re: Closing the antecedent
- References:
- Closing the antecedent
- From: John Jones
- Closing the antecedent
- Prev by Date: Re: FO logic without equality
- Next by Date: Re: Discussion Relationship among Concept Algebra, Set Algebra and Logic Algebra
- Previous by thread: Closing the antecedent
- Next by thread: Re: Closing the antecedent
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|