Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?]


William of Ockham wrote:
david petry wrote:

david petry wrote:
If we are going to communicate, we have to agree on the ground rules.
What I have been arguing for are things that I consider to be part of
the ground rules essential for communication. The idea that only
falsifiable predictions are meaningful is definitional. As I see it, if
you argue against that, you are merely playing word games.

So by definition, only falsifiable predictions are meaningful. Is this
a definition of the word 'meaningful'?

From a scientific point of view, yes, it's part of the definition.

.

Relevant Pages