Mathematical objects and Discernment
- From: "John Jones" <jonescardiff@xxxxxxx>
- Date: 3 Jun 2006 11:12:23 -0700
Differences are apparant between elements in a universe of discourse (
or objects in a framework or model) and each element within the
discourse can also exhibit differences. In the absence of a universe of
discourse, no differences can be discernible between elements and an
element exhibits no differences itself.
Similarity, identity, countability, etc., require a universe of
discourse where differences are established. Yet it is difficult to
conceive how a universe of discourse could be constructed to support
differences: objects cannot be gathered in the manner of the
collections of a set, for 'gathering' implies a physical manoevure, and
physicality already implies a framework within which differences can be
established.
It is clear then, that if we wish to construct a universe of discourse
based on the idea of the collection of the set then we need to
re-define the set. A set 'collection' could now be defined on an
experiential basis as being comprised of those elements upon which our
attention is directed. 'Attention' is hardly of the stuff on which
mathematics or Frege's third realm of arithmetical objects is based.
Nevertheless, and if we examine mathematics closely, we shall find that
'attention' is one of many hidden manoevures used by mathematics that
do not fit in well with the popular idea of mathematical objects.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Mathematical objects and Discernment
- From: LauLuna
- Re: Mathematical objects and Discernment
- Prev by Date: Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?]
- Next by Date: Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?]
- Previous by thread: Re: omega consistency
- Next by thread: Re: Mathematical objects and Discernment
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading