Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?]


William of Ockham wrote:
david petry wrote:
And I'd want to know what your motivation in this
silly argument is.

It's not a silly argument. You have made a very sweeping claim (namely
that only verifiable statements are meaningful).

That's exactly wrong. I'm claiming that only falsifiable statements
are meaningful (from a scientific point of view). Evidently you have
understood almost nothing of what I have been saying.

.