Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?]
- From: "david petry" <david_lawrence_petry@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 4 Jun 2006 16:26:25 -0700
Patricia Shanahan wrote:
david petry wrote:
I'm claiming that only falsifiable statements
are meaningful (from a scientific point of view).
But why should a scientific point of view apply to mathematics? They are
entirely different subjects, with different objectives.
Remember what my basic thesis is: all of the mathematics that has the
potential to help us understand the world in which we live (i.e. the
observable universe) must have an interpretation as making predictions
about the results of computational experiments.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?]
- From: Patricia Shanahan
- Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?]
- References:
- Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?]
- From: david petry
- Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?]
- From: William of Ockham
- Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?]
- From: david petry
- Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?]
- From: William of Ockham
- Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?]
- From: david petry
- Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?]
- From: William of Ockham
- Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?]
- From: david petry
- Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?]
- From: William of Ockham
- Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?]
- From: david petry
- Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?]
- From: Patricia Shanahan
- Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?]
- Prev by Date: The largest number
- Next by Date: Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?]
- Previous by thread: Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?]
- Next by thread: Re: Why? [was Re: Cantor`s powerset theorem is false?]
- Index(es):
Loading