The God Paradox
- From: indoarsman@xxxxxxxx
- Date: 14 Jul 2006 07:36:29 -0700
The God Paradox is stated as:
"Can God create a stone so heavy He can't lift it?"
It is postulated that God is omnipotent, so we deduce that He can: (1)
create a stone of any weight, (2) lift a stone of any weight, and, by
interpreting the paradoxical statement, (3) create a stone He cannot
lift.
But deductions 2 and 3 are logically inconsistent, since they suggest
that God is both able to lift a stone and not able to lift the same
stone.
Since we have an apparent logical paradox, let's examine the logical
structure of the paradoxical statement, which contains two propositions
(p1 . p2):
God can create a stone of any weight?
and
God can lift any stone He creates?
But the second proposition is presented negatively, so the statement
should be represented as (p1 . ~p2):
God can create a stone of any weight?
and
God can not lift any stone He creates?
that p2 is false, so we conclude thatFrom deduction 1, p1 is true, and from deduction 2 we further deduce
p1 . ~p2 = F
without logical contradiction.
Indoarsman
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: The God Paradox
- From: Charlie-Boo
- Re: The God Paradox
- From: Jan Burse
- Re: The God Paradox
- From: William Elliot
- Re: The God Paradox
- From: John Jones
- Re: The God Paradox
- Prev by Date: Re: Set theory ZFC is inconsistent.
- Next by Date: Re: Why?
- Previous by thread: String and Language
- Next by thread: Re: The God Paradox
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|