Re: Why?
- From: "MoeBlee" <jazzmobe@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 14 Jul 2006 09:15:39 -0700
Alan Smaill wrote:
If your classical analogue is set theory (and you're not interested in
the details of the representation of notions from analysis) then you
can look for example at the axiomatisation of the Calculus of Constructions
in wikipedia (this is the base system implemented in Coq):
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Calculus_of_constructions
Thanks, Alan. This gives me a good signpost to follow, and incentive to
get more conversant in lambda calculus as well.
MoeBlee
.
- References:
- Re: Why?
- From: Alan Smaill
- Re: Why?
- Prev by Date: The God Paradox
- Next by Date: Easier solution to wiles´ one to the fermat congruence
- Previous by thread: Re: Why?
- Next by thread: http://nonnewtoniancalculus.googlepages.com/home // Non-Newtonian Calculus
- Index(es):
Loading