sci.logic

• Date Index

---

• Universal Logic ?, lebel
• The incompleteness theorems, Sigma-1-completeness, induction, all that, Aatu Koskensilta
  • Re: The incompleteness theorems, Sigma-1-completeness, induction, all that, george
    • Re: The incompleteness theorems, Sigma-1-completeness, induction, all that, Aatu Koskensilta
    • Re: The incompleteness theorems, Sigma-1-completeness, induction, all that, Aatu Koskensilta
  • Re: The incompleteness theorems, Sigma-1-completeness, induction, all that, Rupert
    • Re: The incompleteness theorems, Sigma-1-completeness, induction, all that, Aatu Koskensilta
  • Re: The incompleteness theorems, Sigma-1-completeness, induction, all that, george
    • Re: The incompleteness theorems, Sigma-1-completeness, induction, all that, Rupert
  • Re: The incompleteness theorems, Sigma-1-completeness, induction, all that, george
• Any First Order or Set Theoretic versions of Fitch Operators?, Dan Christensen
• Must higher-order logic be typed?, yuyang08
  • Re: Must higher-order logic be typed?, klxto
  • Re: Must higher-order logic be typed?, xilog
    • Re: Must higher-order logic be typed?, Newberry
      • Re: Must higher-order logic be typed?, xilog
      • Re: Must higher-order logic be typed?, Owen
      • Re: Must higher-order logic be typed?, MoeBlee
      • Re: Must higher-order logic be typed?, Newberry
      • Re: Must higher-order logic be typed?, Owen
• How many orders does our brains have?, yuyang08
  • Re: How many orders does our brains have?, Fuckwit
  • Re: How many orders does our brains have?, Frederick Williams
• Re: Propositional calculus, Jan Burse
• FRIEDMANN EQUATION and KEMIEMANN EQUATION!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!, NILS BÖRJESSON
  • Re: FRIEDMANN EQUATION and KEMIEMANN EQUATION!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!, The Ghost In The Machine
• bXc = b -> b=0 (with regularity but not infinity), MoeBlee
  • Re: bXc = b -> b=0 (with regularity but not infinity), Rupert
  • Re: bXc = b -> b=0 (with regularity but not infinity), Rupert
    • Re: bXc = b -> b=0 (with regularity but not infinity), Rupert
    • Re: bXc = b -> b=0 (with regularity but not infinity), Rupert
      • Re: bXc = b -> b=0 (with regularity but not infinity), William Elliot
      • Re: bXc = b -> b=0 (with regularity but not infinity), MoeBlee
      • [] bXc = b -> b=0 (with regularity but not infinity), William Elliot
      • Re: bXc = b -> b=0 (with regularity but not infinity), MoeBlee
      • Re: bXc = b -> b=0 (with regularity but not infinity), MoeBlee
      • Re: bXc = b -> b=0 (with regularity but not infinity), Rupert
      • Re: bXc = b -> b=0 (with regularity but not infinity), MoeBlee
• Every set x equinumerous with a set y disjoint from x?, MoeBlee
  • Re: Every set x equinumerous with a set y disjoint from x?, Rupert
    • Re: Every set x equinumerous with a set y disjoint from x?, MoeBlee
      • Re: Every set x equinumerous with a set y disjoint from x?, Rupert
      • Re: Every set x equinumerous with a set y disjoint from x?, MoeBlee
      • Re: Every set x equinumerous with a set y disjoint from x?, MoeBlee
      • Re: Every set x equinumerous with a set y disjoint from x?, Rupert
      • Re: Every set x equinumerous with a set y disjoint from x?, MoeBlee
      • Re: Every set x equinumerous with a set y disjoint from x?, Rupert
      • Re: Every set x equinumerous with a set y disjoint from x?, MoeBlee
      • Re: Every set x equinumerous with a set y disjoint from x?, Rupert
      • Re: Every set x equinumerous with a set y disjoint from x?, Rupert
      • Re: Every set x equinumerous with a set y disjoint from x?, MoeBlee
      • Re: Every set x equinumerous with a set y disjoint from x?, Chris Menzel
      • Re: Every set x equinumerous with a set y disjoint from x?, MoeBlee
      • Re: Every set x equinumerous with a set y disjoint from x?, Chris Menzel
      • Re: Every set x equinumerous with a set y disjoint from x?, MoeBlee
      • Re: Every set x equinumerous with a set y disjoint from x?, David C . Ullrich
      • Re: Every set x equinumerous with a set y disjoint from x?, MoeBlee
      • Re: Every set x equinumerous with a set y disjoint from x?, David C . Ullrich
      • Re: Every set x equinumerous with a set y disjoint from x?, Rupert
      • Re: Every set x equinumerous with a set y disjoint from x?, David C . Ullrich
      • Re: Every set x equinumerous with a set y disjoint from x?, Frederick Williams
      • Re: Every set x equinumerous with a set y disjoint from x?, MoeBlee
      • Re: Every set x equinumerous with a set y disjoint from x?, MoeBlee
      • Re: Every set x equinumerous with a set y disjoint from x?, David C . Ullrich
      • Re: Every set x equinumerous with a set y disjoint from x?, MoeBlee
• Every set can be ... ordered?, MoeBlee
  • Re: Every set can be ... ordered?, MoeBlee
    • Re: Every set can be ... ordered?, The Ghost In The Machine
      • Re: Every set can be ... ordered?, Rupert
      • Re: Every set can be ... ordered?, The Ghost In The Machine
      • Re: Every set can be ... ordered?, Rupert
      • Re: Every set can be ... ordered?, MoeBlee
  • Re: Every set can be ... ordered?, Rupert
    • Re: Every set can be ... ordered?, MoeBlee
      • Re: Every set can be ... ordered?, Rupert
      • Re: Every set can be ... ordered?, tchow
      • Re: Every set can be ... ordered?, Patricia Shanahan
      • Re: Every set can be ... ordered?, tchow
      • Re: Every set can be ... ordered?, MoeBlee
      • Re: Every set can be ... ordered?, Rupert
      • Re: Every set can be ... ordered?, MoeBlee
• Mathematician (Contractor/Consultant), jmcgowan
• Why so many overlapping terminologies, Terry Padden
  • Re: Why so many overlapping terminologies, William Elliot
    • Re: Why so many overlapping terminologies, Terry Padden
      • Re: Why so many overlapping terminologies, William Elliot
  • Re: Why so many overlapping terminologies, patro
    • Re: Why so many overlapping terminologies, Terry Padden
      • Re: Why so many overlapping terminologies, William Elliot
• Question about McKinsey and Tarski paper, Rupert
  • Re: Question about McKinsey and Tarski paper, semiopen
    • Re: Question about McKinsey and Tarski paper, semiopen
• Is this set theory?, jeg@xxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Go Flip A Coin (chance knowledge), Jean-Claude Arbaut
• A theorem of Lindenbaum regarding FOL metalogical properties, mordov
  • Re: A theorem of Lindenbaum regarding FOL metalogical properties, mordov
    • Re: A theorem of Lindenbaum regarding FOL metalogical properties, Aatu Koskensilta
• the consistency of predicate logic., kjd_72
  • Re: the consistency of predicate logic., Rupert
    • Re: the consistency of predicate logic., MoeBlee
      • Re: the consistency of predicate logic., Rupert
      • Re: the consistency of predicate logic., MoeBlee
      • Re: the consistency of predicate logic., Rupert
      • Re: the consistency of predicate logic., MoeBlee
      • Re: the consistency of predicate logic., aussiekevin
      • Re: the consistency of predicate logic., Rupert
  • Re: the consistency of predicate logic., Aatu Koskensilta
    • Re: the consistency of predicate logic., fjmd1a
      • Re: the consistency of predicate logic., Jan Burse
      • Re: the consistency of predicate logic., Aatu Koskensilta
• Concerning simple induction., Bill Taylor
  • Re: Concerning simple induction., Patricia Shanahan
  • Re: Concerning simple induction., Barb Knox
  • Re: Concerning simple induction., David C . Ullrich
  • Re: Concerning simple induction., Dave L. Renfro
  • Re: Concerning simple induction., Rupert
    • Re: Concerning simple induction., Rupert
  • Re: Concerning simple induction., James Dolan
• Re: summary of some of my forecasts of the past 10 years; birdflu,global warming,Iraq, Jan Burse
• what is "software", zxcv_890
  • Re: what is "software", William Elliot
    • Re: what is "software", zxcv_890
      • Re: what is "software", William Elliot
      • Re: what is "software", zxcv_890
      • Re: what is "software", Peter Webb
      • Re: what is "software", William Elliot
      • Re: what is "software", Patricia Shanahan
      • Re: what is "software", zxcv_890
      • [] what is "software", William Elliot
      • Re: what is "software", Dave L. Renfro
      • Re: what is "software", Aatu Koskensilta
      • Re: what is "software", uiucedward@xxxxxxxxx
      • [] what is "software", William Elliot
      • Re: [] what is "software", Fuckwit
      • Re: [] what is "software", William Elliot
  • Re: what is "software", Patricia Shanahan
    • Re: what is "software", zxcv_890
      • Re: what is "software", Patricia Shanahan
  • Re: what is "software", Barb Knox
    • Re: what is "software", zxcv_890
      • Re: what is "software", Barb Knox
  • Re: what is "software", Fuckwit
• A question about FOL theories and models, Nam Nguyen
  • Re: A question about FOL theories and models, Jack Campin - bogus address
    • Re: A question about FOL theories and models, galathaea
  • Re: A question about FOL theories and models, Rupert
    • Re: A question about FOL theories and models, MoeBlee
      • Re: A question about FOL theories and models, Rupert
      • Re: A question about FOL theories and models, MoeBlee
  • Re: A question about FOL theories and models, George Dance
    • Re: A question about FOL theories and models, Chris Menzel
      • Re: A question about FOL theories and models, George Dance
      • Re: A question about FOL theories and models, galathaea
  • Re: A question about FOL theories and models, tchow
    • Re: A question about FOL theories and models, george
    • Re: A question about FOL theories and models, Nam Nguyen
      • Re: A question about FOL theories and models, Nam Nguyen
      • Re: A question about FOL theories and models, MoeBlee
      • Re: A question about FOL theories and models, Nam Nguyen
      • Re: A question about FOL theories and models, MoeBlee
      • Re: A question about FOL theories and models, Nam Nguyen
      • Re: A question about FOL theories and models, MoeBlee
      • Re: A question about FOL theories and models, Nam Nguyen
      • Re: A question about FOL theories and models, MoeBlee
      • Re: A question about FOL theories and models, MoeBlee
      • Re: A question about FOL theories and models, Aatu Koskensilta
      • Re: A question about FOL theories and models, MoeBlee
      • Re: A question about FOL theories and models, MoeBlee
      • Re: A question about FOL theories and models, Nam Nguyen
      • Re: A question about FOL theories and models, MoeBlee
      • Re: A question about FOL theories and models, Nam Nguyen
      • Re: A question about FOL theories and models, MoeBlee
      • Re: A question about FOL theories and models, Nam Nguyen
      • Re: A question about FOL theories and models, Nam Nguyen
      • Re: A question about FOL theories and models, Russell Easterly
      • Re: A question about FOL theories and models, Jan Burse
      • Re: A question about FOL theories and models, Aatu Koskensilta
      • Re: A question about FOL theories and models, Nam Nguyen
      • Re: A question about FOL theories and models, Aatu Koskensilta
      • Re: A question about FOL theories and models, galathaea
      • Re: A question about FOL theories and models, Aatu Koskensilta
      • Re: A question about FOL theories and models, tchow
      • Re: A question about FOL theories and models, Nam Nguyen
• Current World Issues affecting people, thepossibilities
  • Re: Current World Issues affecting people, William Elliot
    • Re: Current World Issues affecting people, thepossibilities
      • Re: Current World Issues affecting people, William Elliot
  • Re: Current World Issues affecting people, Scott
  • Re: Current World Issues affecting people, uiucedward@xxxxxxxxx
• Ebay Item: Puzzles Galore, wooks
• apptitude, visa
  • Re: apptitude, priya
    • Re: apptitude, Patricia Shanahan
      • Re: apptitude, priya
    • Re: apptitude, visa
      • Re: apptitude, George Dance
  • Re: apptitude, priya
  • Re: apptitude, George Dance
    • Re: apptitude, visa
      • Re: apptitude, George Dance
• hi i am the newer, visa
  • Re: hi i am the newer, galathaea
• Re: A question in Logic, Peter Einstein
  • Re: A question in Logic, Frederick Williams
• Are you really any different from gaggling geese?, john
  • Re: Are you really any different from gaggling geese?, Aatu Koskensilta
    • Re: Are you really any different from gaggling geese?, Ross A. Finlayson
      • Re: Are you really any different from gaggling geese?, Aatu Koskensilta
      • Re: Are you really any different from gaggling geese?, William Elliot
      • Re: Are you really any different from gaggling geese?, Aatu Koskensilta
      • Re: Are you really any different from gaggling geese?, Aatu Koskensilta
      • Re: Are you really any different from gaggling geese?, Ross A. Finlayson
      • Re: Are you really any different from gaggling geese?, Aatu Koskensilta
      • Re: Are you really any different from gaggling geese?, Ross A. Finlayson
      • Re: Are you really any different from gaggling geese?, Aatu Koskensilta
      • Re: Are you really any different from gaggling geese?, Ross A. Finlayson
      • Re: Are you really any different from gaggling geese?, Ross A. Finlayson
      • Re: Are you really any different from gaggling geese?, Aatu Koskensilta
      • Re: Are you really any different from gaggling geese?, Ross A. Finlayson
      • Re: Are you really any different from gaggling geese?, tchow
    • Re: Are you really any different from gaggling geese?, fjmd1a
      • Re: Are you really any different from gaggling geese?, john
      • Re: Are you really any different from gaggling geese?, William Elliot
      • Re: Are you really any different from gaggling geese?, Aatu Koskensilta
    • Re: Are you really any different from gaggling geese?, fjmd1a
  • Re: Are you really any different from gaggling geese?, William Elliot
    • Re: Are you really any different from gaggling geese?, john
      • Re: Are you really any different from gaggling geese?, William Elliot
    • Re: Are you really any different from gaggling geese?, Russell Easterly
      • Re: Are you really any different from gaggling geese?, William Elliot
      • Re: Are you really any different from gaggling geese?, Russell Easterly
      • Re: Are you really any different from gaggling geese?, William Elliot
• Call for participants, Katy
• Subject: Existence is necessary ??, oorionus
  • Re: Subject: Existence is necessary ??, Barb Knox
    • Re: Subject: Existence is necessary ??, Chris Menzel
  • Re: Subject: Existence is necessary ??, Paul Holbach
    • Re: Subject: Existence is necessary ??, Paul Holbach
      • Re: Subject: Existence is necessary ??, Paul Holbach
  • Re: Subject: Existence is necessary ??, Chris Menzel
    • Re: Subject: Existence is necessary ??, Paul Holbach
      • Re: Subject: Existence is necessary ??, Chris Menzel
      • Re: Subject: Existence is necessary ??, Paul Holbach
      • Re: Subject: Existence is necessary ??, Chris Menzel
      • Re: Subject: Existence is necessary ??, Paul Holbach
      • Re: Subject: Existence is necessary ??, Paul Holbach
      • Re: Subject: Existence is necessary ??, Paul Holbach
      • Re: Subject: Existence is necessary ??, Paul Holbach
      • Re: Subject: Existence is necessary ??, Paul Holbach
      • Re: Subject: Existence is necessary ??, Paul Holbach
    • Re: Subject: Existence is necessary ??, oorionus
      • Re: Subject: Existence is necessary ??, oorionus
      • Re: Subject: Existence is necessary ??, oorionus
      • Re: Subject: Existence is necessary ??, Chris Menzel
      • Re: Subject: Existence is necessary ??, oorionus
      • Re: Subject: Existence is necessary ??, Chris Menzel
      • Re: Subject: Existence is necessary ??, Chris Menzel
  • Re: Subject: Existence is necessary ??, George Dance
    • Re: Subject: Existence is necessary ??, oorionus
• Provable in T?, bargiax
  • Re: Provable in T?, Aatu Koskensilta
    • Re: Provable in T?, bargiax
    • Re: Provable in T?, Newberry
      • Re: Provable in T?, Aatu Koskensilta
      • Re: Provable in T?, Newberry
      • Re: Provable in T?, Aatu Koskensilta
      • Re: Provable in T?, Rupert
      • Re: Provable in T?, Rupert
      • Re: Provable in T?, george
      • Re: Provable in T?, Rupert
      • Re: Provable in T?, george
      • Re: Provable in T?, Aatu Koskensilta
      • Re: Provable in T?, george
      • Re: Provable in T?, Aatu Koskensilta
      • Re: Provable in T?, Rupert
      • Re: Provable in T?, george
      • Re: Provable in T?, Aatu Koskensilta
      • Re: Provable in T?, george
      • Re: Provable in T?, Aatu Koskensilta
      • Re: Provable in T?, george
      • Re: Provable in T?, george
      • Re: Provable in T?, Rupert
      • Re: Provable in T?, george
      • Re: Provable in T?, tchow
      • Re: Provable in T?, Russell Easterly
      • Re: Provable in T?, Jan Burse
      • Re: Provable in T?, Russell Easterly
      • Re: Provable in T?, Jan Burse
      • Re: Provable in T?, tchow
      • Re: Provable in T?, Russell Easterly
      • Re: Provable in T?, Chris Menzel
      • Re: Provable in T?, Aatu Koskensilta
      • Re: Provable in T?, Chris Menzel
      • Re: Provable in T?, tchow
      • Re: Provable in T?, Russell Easterly
      • Re: Provable in T?, Patricia Shanahan
      • Re: Provable in T?, tchow
      • Re: Provable in T?, george
      • Re: Provable in T?, Rupert
      • Re: Provable in T?, george
      • Re: Provable in T?, Aatu Koskensilta
      • Re: Provable in T?, george
      • Re: Provable in T?, Aatu Koskensilta
      • Re: Provable in T?, george
      • Re: Provable in T?, Rupert
      • Re: Provable in T?, Aatu Koskensilta
      • sigma-1 completeness vs. 1-consistency, george
      • Re: Provable in T?, george
      • Re: Provable in T?, Aatu Koskensilta
      • Re: Provable in T?, Rupert
      • Re: Provable in T?, MoeBlee
      • Re: Provable in T?, Aatu Koskensilta
      • Re: Provable in T?, MoeBlee
      • Re: Provable in T?, MoeBlee
      • Re: Provable in T?, Aatu Koskensilta
      • Re: Provable in T?, Aatu Koskensilta
      • Re: Provable in T?, MoeBlee
      • Re: Provable in T?, MoeBlee
      • Re: Provable in T?, Aatu Koskensilta
      • Re: Provable in T?, MoeBlee
      • Re: Provable in T?, george
      • Re: Provable in T?, Aatu Koskensilta
      • Re: Provable in T?, Aatu Koskensilta
      • Re: Provable in T?, Newberry
      • Re: Provable in T?, george
      • Re: Provable in T?, Rupert
      • Re: Provable in T?, george
      • Re: Provable in T?, tchow
      • Re: Provable in T?, george
      • Re: Provable in T?, tchow
      • Re: Provable in T?, Rupert
      • Re: Provable in T?, tchow
      • Re: Provable in T?, george
      • Re: Provable in T?, tchow
      • Re: Provable in T?, Aatu Koskensilta
      • Re: Provable in T?, george
      • Re: Provable in T?, tchow
      • Re: Provable in T?, Rupert
      • Re: Provable in T?, Rupert
      • Re: Provable in T?, Aatu Koskensilta
      • Re: Provable in T?, Rupert
      • Re: Provable in T?, george
      • Re: Provable in T?, Newberry
      • Re: Provable in T?, Nam Nguyen
      • Re: Provable in T?, Nam Nguyen
      • Re: Provable in T?, Chris Menzel
      • Message not available
      • Re: Provable in T?, Chris Menzel
      • Re: Provable in T?, Nam Nguyen
      • Re: Provable in T?, Rupert
      • Re: Provable in T?, Nam Nguyen
      • Re: Provable in T?, Rupert
      • Re: Provable in T?, Nam Nguyen
      • Re: Provable in T?, Rupert
      • Re: Provable in T?, Nam Nguyen
      • Re: Provable in T?, Rupert
      • Re: Provable in T?, george
• ordinals, James Dolan
  • Re: ordinals, Aatu Koskensilta
    • Re: ordinals, James Dolan
      • Re: ordinals, Aatu Koskensilta
      • Re: ordinals, James Dolan
      • Re: ordinals, Aatu Koskensilta
      • Re: ordinals, James Dolan
      • Re: ordinals, Aatu Koskensilta
• Need help with logic proof, Dan Christensen
  • Re: Need help with logic proof, William Elliot
    • Re: Need help with logic proof, Fuckwit
      • Re: Need help with logic proof, William Elliot
      • Re: Need help with logic proof, Fuckwit
      • Re: Need help with logic proof, Fuckwit
      • Re: Need help with logic proof, William Elliot
  • Re: Need help with logic proof, Fuckwit
    • Re: Need help with logic proof, Dan Christensen
      • Re: Need help with logic proof, Frederick Williams
      • Re: Need help with logic proof, Fuckwit
      • Re: Need help with logic proof, Fuckwit
    • Re: Need help with logic proof, Jan Burse
      • Re: Need help with logic proof, William Elliot
      • Re: Need help with logic proof, Jan Burse
      • Re: Need help with logic proof, William Elliot
      • Re: Need help with logic proof, Fuckwit
      • Re: Need help with logic proof, Jan Burse
      • Re: Need help with logic proof, Fuckwit
      • Re: Need help with logic proof, Barb Knox
      • Re: Need help with logic proof, William Elliot
      • Re: Need help with logic proof, Fuckwit
      • Re: Need help with logic proof, William Elliot
      • Re: Need help with logic proof, Fuckwit
      • Re: Need help with logic proof, Fuckwit
    • Re: Need help with logic proof, Jan Burse
  • Re: Need help with logic proof, George Dance
    • Re: Need help with logic proof, George Dance
  • Re: Need help with logic proof, Dan Christensen
    • Re: Need help with logic proof, Dan Christensen
      • Re: Need help with logic proof, Jan Burse
      • Re: Need help with logic proof, Dan Christensen
• Torkel Franzén Lives!, MoeBlee
  • Re: Torkel Franzén Lives!, Aatu Koskensilta
    • Re: Torkel Franzén Lives!, Chris Menzel
      • Re: Torkel Franzén Lives!, Aatu Koskensilta
      • Re: Torkel Franzén Lives!, Herman Jurjus
      • Re: Torkel Franzén Lives!, George Dance
      • Re: Torkel Franzén Lives!, Herman Jurjus
      • Re: Torkel Franzén Lives!, George Dance
      • Re: Torkel Franzén Lives!, george
      • Re: Torkel Franzén Lives!, Aatu Koskensilta
      • Re: Torkel Franzén Lives!, george
      • Re: Torkel Franzén Lives!, George Dance
      • Re: Torkel Franzén Lives!, Aatu Koskensilta
      • Re: Torkel Franzén Lives!, Charlie-Boo
      • Re: Torkel Franzén Lives!, Aatu Koskensilta
      • Re: Torkel Franzén Lives!, Charlie-Boo
      • Re: Torkel Franzén Lives!, George Dance
      • Re: Torkel Franzén Lives!, Aatu Koskensilta
      • Re: Torkel Franzén Lives!, tchow
      • Re: Torkel Franzén Lives!, George Dance
      • Re: Torkel Franzén Lives!, Chris Menzel
      • Re: Torkel Franzén Lives!, Aatu Koskensilta
      • Re: Torkel Franzén Lives!, George Dance
      • Re: Re: Torkel Franzén Lives!, tchow
      • Re: Torkel Franzén Lives!, George Dance
      • Re: Torkel Franzén Lives!, Aatu Koskensilta
      • Re: Torkel Franzén Lives!, George Dance
    • Re: Torkel Franzén Lives!, MoeBlee
      • Re: Torkel Franzén Lives!, George Dance
      • Re: Torkel Franzén Lives!, Aatu Koskensilta
      • Re: Torkel Franzén Lives!, Keith Ramsay
      • Re: Torkel Franzén Lives!, Charlie-Boo
      • Re: Torkel Franzén Lives!, Patrick
      • Re: Torkel Franzén Lives!, George Dance
      • Re: Torkel Franzén Lives!, Patrick
      • Re: Torkel Franzén Lives!, George Dance
      • Re: Torkel Franzén Lives!, Aatu Koskensilta
      • Re: Torkel Franzén Lives!, Fuckwit
      • Re: Torkel Franzén Lives!, George Dance
      • Re: Torkel Franzén Lives!, Aatu Koskensilta
      • Re: Torkel Franzén Lives!, Fuckwit
      • Re: Torkel Franzén Lives!, George Dance
      • Re: Torkel Franzén Lives!, Aatu Koskensilta
      • Re: Torkel Franzén Lives!, George Dance
      • Re: Torkel Franzén Lives!, Aatu Koskensilta
      • Re: Torkel Franzén Lives!, George Dance
      • Re: Torkel Franzén Lives!, Aatu Koskensilta
      • Re: Torkel Franzén Lives!, David C . Ullrich
      • Re: Torkel Franzén Lives!, Aatu Koskensilta
      • Re: Torkel Franzén Lives!, George Dance
      • Re: Torkel Franzén Lives!, David C . Ullrich
      • Re: Torkel Franzén Lives!, George Dance
      • Re: Torkel Franzén Lives!, Fuckwit
      • Re: Torkel Franzén Lives!, George Dance
      • Re: Torkel Franzén Lives!, David C . Ullrich
      • Re: Torkel Franzén Lives!, George Dance
      • Re: Torkel Franzén Lives!, David C . Ullrich
      • Re: Torkel Franzén Lives!, Charlie-Boo
      • Re: Torkel Franzén Lives!, George Dance
      • Re: Torkel Franzén Lives!, Henrik
      • Re: Torkel Franzén Lives!, George Dance
      • Re: Torkel Franzén Lives!, MoeBlee
• Tennenbaum's theorem, fjmd1a
  • Re: Tennenbaum's theorem, feffemannen
    • Re: Tennenbaum's theorem, Aatu Koskensilta
      • Re: Tennenbaum's theorem, feffemannen
      • Re: Tennenbaum's theorem, Aatu Koskensilta
      • Re: Tennenbaum's theorem, feffemannen
      • Re: Tennenbaum's theorem, Aatu Koskensilta
      • Re: Tennenbaum's theorem, Gc
      • Re: Tennenbaum's theorem, Aatu Koskensilta
      • Re: Tennenbaum's theorem, fjmd1a
      • Re: Tennenbaum's theorem, Aatu Koskensilta
      • Re: Tennenbaum's theorem, fjmd1a
      • Re: Tennenbaum's theorem, Aatu Koskensilta
      • Re: Tennenbaum's theorem, fjmd1a
      • Re: Tennenbaum's theorem, Aatu Koskensilta
      • Re: Tennenbaum's theorem, fjmd1a
      • Re: Tennenbaum's theorem, Aatu Koskensilta
      • Re: Tennenbaum's theorem, tchow
      • Re: Tennenbaum's theorem, fjmd1a
      • Re: Tennenbaum's theorem, tchow
      • Re: Tennenbaum's theorem, feffemannen
      • Re: Tennenbaum's theorem, fjmd1a
    • Re: Tennenbaum's theorem, fjmd1a
  • Re: Tennenbaum's theorem, Aatu Koskensilta
    • Re: Tennenbaum's theorem, fjmd1a
      • Re: Tennenbaum's theorem, Aatu Koskensilta
• Representation of "slightly greater than", s . j . lagoe
  • Re: Representation of "slightly greater than", Jan Burse
    • Re: Representation of "slightly greater than", s . j . lagoe
      • Re: Representation of "slightly greater than", George Dance
      • Re: Representation of "slightly greater than", Jan Burse
  • Re: Representation of "slightly greater than", Fuckwit
  • Re: Representation of "slightly greater than", Bill Taylor
• Enumerable sets, herbzet
  • Re: Enumerable sets, Rupert
    • Re: Enumerable sets, herbzet
      • Re: Enumerable sets, Rupert
      • Re: Enumerable sets, herbzet
      • Re: Enumerable sets, Rupert
      • Re: Enumerable sets, herbzet
  • Re: Enumerable sets, george
    • Re: Enumerable sets, fred . galvin
      • Re: Enumerable sets, herbzet
      • Re: Enumerable sets, Peter Webb
    • Re: Enumerable sets, herbzet
      • Re: Enumerable sets, george
      • Re: Enumerable sets, fred . galvin
      • Re: Enumerable sets, george
      • Re: Enumerable sets, Barb Knox
      • Re: Enumerable sets, herbzet
      • Re: Enumerable sets, fred . galvin
      • Re: Enumerable sets, herbzet
      • Re: Enumerable sets, george
      • Re: Enumerable sets, george
      • Re: Enumerable sets, fred . galvin
      • Re: Enumerable sets, herbzet
      • Re: Enumerable sets, george
      • Re: Enumerable sets, fred . galvin
      • bloated axioms revisited, george
      • Re: Enumerable sets, george
      • Re: Enumerable sets, george
      • Re: Enumerable sets, herbzet
      • Re: Enumerable sets, herbzet
• Re: Proofs to programs, Jan Burse
  • Re: Proofs to programs, Charlie-Boo
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Proofs to programs, Jan Burse
    • Re: Proofs to programs, Charlie-Boo
      • Re: Proofs to programs, Jan Burse
      • Re: Proofs to programs, Charlie-Boo
• Quantifier Elimination vs Model Complete Theories, Blake Manner
• Characterization of Gamma_0, Daryl McCullough
  • Re: Characterization of Gamma_0, Rupert
    • Re: Characterization of Gamma_0, Daryl McCullough
      • Re: Characterization of Gamma_0, Rupert
      • Re: Characterization of Gamma_0, Rupert
      • Re: Characterization of Gamma_0, Rupert
      • Re: Characterization of Gamma_0, Daryl McCullough
      • Re: Characterization of Gamma_0, Rupert
  • Re: Characterization of Gamma_0, Bill Taylor
    • Re: Characterization of Gamma_0, Daryl McCullough
  • Re: Characterization of Gamma_0, Aatu Koskensilta
• i=infinity;0= i*sin k*pi, 1=cos k*pi, k=m/n, n=4,m=0-00; c*G=20=const, 1/sgrt2>G>0.5, 6<N = NA ^2surf/NAvol<7 ; h/N =11=const, e+i*pi; D universe =f(h)*1/ (a))^4, T=f( m, S, D), ivars . fabriciuss
• unification, raldo
• Re: Set Theories with Universes, Fuckwit
  • Re: Set Theories with Universes, oorionus
    • Re: Set Theories with Universes, Fuckwit
      • Re: Set Theories with Universes, oorionus
      • Re: Set Theories with Universes, Fuckwit
      • Re: Set Theories with Universes, oorionus
      • Re: Set Theories with Universes, MoeBlee
      • Re: Set Theories with Universes, oorionus
      • Re: Set Theories with Universes, Fuckwit
      • Re: Set Theories with Universes, oorionus
      • Re: Set Theories with Universes, MoeBlee
      • Re: Set Theories with Universes, Fuckwit
      • Re: Set Theories with Universes, MoeBlee
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Set Theories with Universes, Fuckwit
• Question about non-classical logics, Newberry
  • Re: Question about non-classical logics, Jack Campin - bogus address
• Complete types, Blake Manner
  • Re: Complete types, galathaea
    • Re: Complete types, James Dolan
      • Re: Complete types, Blake Manner
      • Re: Complete types, James Dolan
      • Re: Complete types, Blake Manner
      • Re: Complete types, Blake Manner
      • Re: Complete types, James Dolan
      • Re: Complete types, Blake Manner
      • Re: Complete types, Blake Manner
      • Re: Complete types, galathaea
      • Re: Complete types, James Dolan
• Define a complete type realized by exactly three elements, Blake Manner
• Let's you & him fight, george
  • Re: Let's you & him fight, Rupert
    • Re: Let's you & him fight, Rupert
    • Re: Let's you & him fight, Aatu Koskensilta
      • Re: Let's you & him fight, Daryl McCullough
      • Re: Let's you & him fight, Aatu Koskensilta
      • Re: Let's you & him fight, george
      • Re: Let's you & him fight, Aatu Koskensilta
      • Re: Let's you & him fight, george
      • Re: Let's you & him fight, Aatu Koskensilta
      • Re: Let's you & him fight, george
    • Re: Let's you & him fight, george
      • Re: Let's you & him fight, Rupert
      • Re: Let's you & him fight, Aatu Koskensilta
      • Re: Let's you & him fight, Rupert
  • Re: Let's you & him fight, Aatu Koskensilta
    • Re: Let's you & him fight, Chris Menzel
      • Re: Let's you & him fight, Chris Menzel
      • Re: Let's you & him fight, Rupert
      • Re: Let's you & him fight, Aatu Koskensilta
      • Re: Let's you & him fight, george
• The variant (invariance of light) paradox, jt64
• looking for a tricky answer, n . lutz
  • Re: looking for a tricky answer, William Elliot
  • Re: looking for a tricky answer, George Dance
• Need help proving (Ax)(~P(x)) |- ~(Ex)(P(x)), Mike H
  • Re: Need help proving (Ax)(~P(x)) |- ~(Ex)(P(x)), MoeBlee
    • Re: Need help proving (Ax)(~P(x)) |- ~(Ex)(P(x)), Mike H
      • Re: Need help proving (Ax)(~P(x)) |- ~(Ex)(P(x)), MoeBlee
    • Re: Need help proving (Ax)(~P(x)) |- ~(Ex)(P(x)), bargiax
      • Re: Need help proving (Ax)(~P(x)) |- ~(Ex)(P(x)), MoeBlee
• The Pirate Game Theory Problem and the Trouble with Voter Apathy, Matthew Wampler-Doty
  • Re: The Pirate Game Theory Problem and the Trouble with Voter Apathy, Rupert
    • Re: The Pirate Game Theory Problem and the Trouble with Voter Apathy, Rupert
      • Re: The Pirate Game Theory Problem and the Trouble with Voter Apathy, Rupert
      • Re: The Pirate Game Theory Problem and the Trouble with Voter Apathy, Matthew Wampler-Doty
      • Re: The Pirate Game Theory Problem and the Trouble with Voter Apathy, Rupert
    • Re: The Pirate Game Theory Problem and the Trouble with Voter Apathy, Daryl McCullough
      • Re: The Pirate Game Theory Problem and the Trouble with Voter Apathy, Rupert
• How the God created our terrestrial world?, socratus
• Question about Set Theory, vfilipch
  • Re: Question about Set Theory, Rupert
    • Re: Question about Set Theory, vfilipch
      • Re: Question about Set Theory, Peter Webb
      • Re: Question about Set Theory, vfilipch
      • Re: Question about Set Theory, Peter Webb
      • Re: Question about Set Theory, Patricia Shanahan
      • Re: Question about Set Theory, vfilipch
      • Re: Question about Set Theory, Peter Webb
      • Re: Question about Set Theory, MoeBlee
      • Re: Question about Set Theory, Peter Webb
      • Re: Question about Set Theory, Alan Smaill
      • Re: Question about Set Theory, MoeBlee
      • Re: Question about Set Theory, Peter Webb
      • Re: Question about Set Theory, MoeBlee
      • Re: Question about Set Theory, Peter Webb
      • Re: Question about Set Theory, MoeBlee
      • Re: Question about Set Theory, tchow
      • Re: Question about Set Theory, Rupert
      • Re: Question about Set Theory, vfilipch
      • Re: Question about Set Theory, Rupert
      • Re: Question about Set Theory, MoeBlee
      • Re: Question about Set Theory, Fuckwit
      • Re: Question about Set Theory, MoeBlee
      • Re: Question about Set Theory, Aatu Koskensilta
      • Re: Question about Set Theory, MoeBlee
      • Re: Question about Set Theory, Fuckwit
      • Re: Question about Set Theory, vfilipch
  • Re: Question about Set Theory, Stan
    • Re: Question about Set Theory, vfilipch
      • Re: Question about Set Theory, Stan
      • Re: Question about Set Theory, MoeBlee
      • Re: Question about Set Theory, Stan
      • Re: Question about Set Theory, MoeBlee
      • Re: Question about Set Theory, MoeBlee
      • Re: Question about Set Theory, herbzet
      • Re: Question about Set Theory, herbzet
      • Re: Question about Set Theory, George Dance
      • Re: Question about Set Theory, herbzet
      • Re: Question about Set Theory, Stan
      • Re: Question about Set Theory, vfilipch
      • Re: Question about Set Theory, Stan
      • Re: Question about Set Theory, nthiebaud2000
      • Re: Question about Set Theory, vfilipch
      • Re: Question about Set Theory, vfilipch
  • Re: Question about Set Theory, Frederick Williams
    • Re: Question about Set Theory, vfilipch
      • Re: Question about Set Theory, Frederick Williams
      • Re: Question about Set Theory, vfilipch
      • Re: Question about Set Theory, MoeBlee
      • Re: Question about Set Theory, MoeBlee
  • Re: Question about Set Theory, Jan Burse
    • Re: Question about Set Theory, Jack Campin - bogus address
  • Re: Question about Set Theory, Stan
    • Re: Question about Set Theory, vfilipch
      • Re: Question about Set Theory, Peter Webb
      • Re: Question about Set Theory, Stan
      • Re: Question about Set Theory, vfilipch
      • Re: Question about Set Theory, vfilipch
      • Re: Question about Set Theory, Stan
      • Re: Question about Set Theory, vfilipch
• question, sabom2006
  • Re: question, Frederick Williams
  • Re: question, banterjee
• Question regarding infinite length integers, Scott
  • Re: Question regarding infinite length integers, Rupert
    • Re: Question regarding infinite length integers, Scott
      • Re: Question regarding infinite length integers, Rupert
      • Re: Question regarding infinite length integers, Scott
      • Re: Question regarding infinite length integers, Rupert
      • Re: Question regarding infinite length integers, Scott
  • Re: Question regarding infinite length integers, David C . Ullrich
    • Re: Question regarding infinite length integers, Patricia Shanahan
      • Re: Question regarding infinite length integers, Scott
      • Re: Question regarding infinite length integers, Nam Nguyen
      • Re: Question regarding infinite length integers, David C . Ullrich
      • Re: Question regarding infinite length integers, Newberry
      • Re: Question regarding infinite length integers, David C . Ullrich
  • Re: Question regarding infinite length integers, Newberry
    • Re: Question regarding infinite length integers, Scott
      • Re: Question regarding infinite length integers, Patricia Shanahan
      • Re: Question regarding infinite length integers, David C . Ullrich
      • Re: Question regarding infinite length integers, Scott
      • Re: Question regarding infinite length integers, David C . Ullrich
  • Re: Question regarding infinite length integers, Newberry
    • Re: Question regarding infinite length integers, Jack Campin - bogus address
    • Re: Question regarding infinite length integers, Mike Kelly
      • Re: Question regarding infinite length integers, Newberry
• Tarski finite problem, MoeBlee
  • Re: Tarski finite problem, Rupert
    • Re: Tarski finite problem, MoeBlee
  • Re: Tarski finite problem, Rupert
    • Re: Tarski finite problem, MoeBlee
      • Re: Tarski finite problem, Rupert
      • Re: Tarski finite problem, MoeBlee
  • Re: Tarski finite problem, William Elliot
    • Re: Tarski finite problem, MoeBlee
      • Re: Tarski finite problem, William Elliot
      • Re: Tarski finite problem, MoeBlee
      • Re: Tarski finite problem, William Elliot
      • Re: Tarski finite problem, MoeBlee
• Lob's Theorem in Ethics, Matthew Wampler-Doty
• A curiousity, Fephisto
  • Re: A curiousity, William Elliot
    • Re: A curiousity, fred . galvin
      • Re: A curiousity, William Elliot
  • Re: A curiousity, Frederick Williams
    • Re: A curiousity, Frederick Williams
    • Re: A curiousity, David C . Ullrich
      • Re: A curiousity, herbzet
      • Re: A curiousity, herbzet
      • Re: A curiousity, David C . Ullrich
      • Re: A curiousity, herbzet
      • Re: A curiousity, David C . Ullrich
  • Re: A curiousity, herbzet
    • Re: A curiousity, herbzet
      • Re: A curiousity, herbzet
  • Re: A curiousity, Fuckwit
    • Re: A curiousity, David C . Ullrich
  • Re: A curiousity, David C . Ullrich
    • Re: A curiousity, herbzet
      • Re: A curiousity, Fuckwit
      • Re: A curiousity, herbzet
      • Re: A curiousity, Fuckwit
      • Re: A curiousity, herbzet
      • Re: A curiousity, Fuckwit
      • Re: A curiousity, David C . Ullrich
      • Re: A curiousity, herbzet
      • Re: A curiousity, herbzet
      • Re: A curiousity, Fephisto
      • Re: A curiousity, herbzet
      • Re: A curiousity, Fephisto
      • Re: A curiousity, herbzet
      • Re: A curiousity, Fephisto
      • Re: A curiousity, herbzet
• When does p imply q (redux)?, herbzet
  • Re: When does p imply q (redux)?, herbzet
  • Re: When does p imply q (redux)?, herbzet
  • Re: When does p imply q (redux)?, herbzet
    • Re: When does p imply q (redux)?, herbzet
      • Re: When does p imply q (redux)?, herbzet
      • Re: When does p imply q (redux)?, herbzet
      • Re: When does p imply q (redux)?, herbzet
• Does Science give us knowledge about reality?, Ankmin
  • Re: Does Science give us knowledge about reality?, Rupert
    • Re: Does Science give us knowledge about reality?, Ankmin
      • Re: Does Science give us knowledge about reality?, Rupert
  • Re: Does Science give us knowledge about reality?, Frederick Williams
  • Re: Does Science give us knowledge about reality?, Merlinman2005
• Some ambiguities about the Busy Beaver sequence., ram . rachum
  • Re: Some ambiguities about the Busy Beaver sequence., Aatu Koskensilta
    • Re: Some ambiguities about the Busy Beaver sequence., ram . rachum
      • Re: Some ambiguities about the Busy Beaver sequence., Aatu Koskensilta
  • Re: Some ambiguities about the Busy Beaver sequence., Rupert
    • Re: Some ambiguities about the Busy Beaver sequence., ram . rachum
      • Re: Some ambiguities about the Busy Beaver sequence., berry
      • Re: Some ambiguities about the Busy Beaver sequence., Rupert
• Definablity of substructures and undecidable theories, Isaac
  • Re: Definablity of substructures and undecidable theories, Aatu Koskensilta
    • Re: Definablity of substructures and undecidable theories, Isaac
      • Re: Definablity of substructures and undecidable theories, Aatu Koskensilta
• A cure for IBS, CROHNS, MS, CANCER ?, caesarjbsquitti
• Arbitrary subsets of omega, Blake Manner
  • Re: Arbitrary subsets of omega, William Elliot
    • Re: Arbitrary subsets of omega, Patricia Shanahan
    • Re: Arbitrary subsets of omega, Blake Manner
      • Re: Arbitrary subsets of omega, William Elliot
      • Re: Arbitrary subsets of omega, Aatu Koskensilta
      • Re: Arbitrary subsets of omega, Aatu Koskensilta
  • Re: Arbitrary subsets of omega, Aatu Koskensilta
• OPEN Invitation, ahmedat
  • Re: OPEN Invitation, William Elliot
• Can we using formulas to know anything about the God ?, socratus
  • Re: Can we using formulas to know anything about the God ?, Ankmin
    • Re: Can we using formulas to know anything about the God ?, socratus
• Elementary substructures., Blake Manner
  • Re: Elementary substructures., Aatu Koskensilta
    • Re: Elementary substructures., Aatu Koskensilta
  • Re: Elementary substructures., William Elliot
    • Re: Elementary substructures., fred . galvin
      • Re: Elementary substructures., William Elliot
      • Re: Elementary substructures., David C . Ullrich
  • Re: Elementary substructures., Rupert
    • Re: Elementary substructures., Blake Manner
      • Re: Elementary substructures., Rupert
      • Re: Elementary substructures., Blake Manner
      • Re: Elementary substructures., Blake Manner
      • Re: Elementary substructures., Dmitry Sustretov <dmitry.sustretov@xxxxxxxxx>
      • Re: Elementary substructures., Blake Manner
  • Re: Elementary substructures., Dmitry Sustertov <dmitry.sustretov@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Re: Elementary substructures., Dmitry Sustretov <dmitry.sustretov@xxxxxxxxx>
• Linear Ordering vs Well Ordering, Blake Manner
  • Re: Linear Ordering vs Well Ordering, Aatu Koskensilta
  • Re: Linear Ordering vs Well Ordering, fred . galvin
    • Re: Linear Ordering vs Well Ordering, Blake Manner
      • Re: Linear Ordering vs Well Ordering, fred . galvin
      • Re: Linear Ordering vs Well Ordering, Blake Manner
      • Re: Linear Ordering vs Well Ordering, Dmitry Sustretov <dmitry.sustretov@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Re: Linear Ordering vs Well Ordering, William Elliot
    • Re: Linear Ordering vs Well Ordering, fred . galvin
• Question on Conservative Extensions, Blake Manner
  • Re: Question on Conservative Extensions, Aatu Koskensilta
    • Re: Question on Conservative Extensions, Blake Manner
      • Re: Question on Conservative Extensions, Blake Manner
      • Re: Question on Conservative Extensions, berry
      • Re: Question on Conservative Extensions, Blake Manner
• Re: The List of All Lists, Jeremy Boden
  • Re: The List of All Lists, Frederick Williams
• Generating truth tables, Newberry
  • Re: Generating truth tables, Chris Menzel
  • Re: Generating truth tables, Barb Knox
• Curing ulcers, IBS, CROHNS, DEPRESSION, ANXIETY, SCHIZOPHRENIA, CANCER...?, caesarjbsquitti
  • Re: Curing ulcers, IBS, CROHNS, DEPRESSION, ANXIETY, SCHIZOPHRENIA, CANCER...?, Frederick Williams
    • Re: Curing ulcers, IBS, CROHNS, DEPRESSION, ANXIETY, SCHIZOPHRENIA, CANCER...?, caesarjbsquitti
      • Re: Curing ulcers, IBS, CROHNS, DEPRESSION, ANXIETY, SCHIZOPHRENIA, CANCER...?, Frederick Williams
• Re: Natural numbers, Frederick Williams
  • Re: Natural numbers, Aatu Koskensilta
• Re: non-standard model of PA, fjmd1a
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: non-standard model of PA, fred . galvin
    • Re: non-standard model of PA, Frederick Williams
      • Re: non-standard model of PA, fjmd1a
      • Re: non-standard model of PA, berry
      • Re: non-standard model of PA, berry
      • Re: non-standard model of PA, Frederick Williams
      • Re: non-standard model of PA, Frederick Williams
      • Re: non-standard model of PA, fjmd1a
      • Re: non-standard model of PA, Frederick Williams
      • Re: non-standard model of PA, fjmd1a
      • Re: non-standard model of PA, Chris Menzel
      • Re: non-standard model of PA, fjmd1a
      • Re: non-standard model of PA, Chris Menzel
      • Re: non-standard model of PA, fjmd1a
      • Re: non-standard model of PA, Chris Menzel
      • Re: non-standard model of PA, fjmd1a
      • Re: non-standard model of PA, Chris Menzel
      • Re: non-standard model of PA, Pierre Asselin
      • Re: non-standard model of PA, Frederick Williams
      • Re: non-standard model of PA, Chris Menzel
      • Re: non-standard model of PA, fjmd1a
    • Re: non-standard model of PA, fred . galvin
      • Re: non-standard model of PA, Frederick Williams
• help, can someone help me with one equation, Alicia
  • Re: help, can someone help me with one equation, Aatu Koskensilta
  • Re: help, can someone help me with one equation, Frederick Williams
• Re: A universal introduction rule, Fuckwit
  • Re: A universal introduction rule, Litania
    • Re: A universal introduction rule, Fuckwit
      • Re: A universal introduction rule, Litania
      • Re: A universal introduction rule, Fuckwit
  • Re: A universal introduction rule, Litania
    • Re: A universal introduction rule, Fuckwit
      • Re: A universal introduction rule, Fuckwit
      • Re: A universal introduction rule, Litania
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: A universal introduction rule, Fuckwit
  • Re: A universal introduction rule, Fuckwit
• Re: DNF to CNF, No Way
• mu-operator, bargiax
  • Re: mu-operator, William Elliot
    • Re: mu-operator, tac-tics
  • Re: mu-operator, Rupert
    • Re: mu-operator, Frederick Williams
      • Re: mu-operator, bargiax
      • Re: mu-operator, Frederick Williams
      • Re: mu-operator, Rupert
• an interesting pattern, digorysulkirk
• Question Regarding the Definition of Cantor's Set, Scott
  • Re: Question Regarding the Definition of Cantor's Set, Rupert
    • Re: Question Regarding the Definition of Cantor's Set, Scott
      • Re: Question Regarding the Definition of Cantor's Set, Rupert
      • Re: Question Regarding the Definition of Cantor's Set, Scott
      • Re: Question Regarding the Definition of Cantor's Set, Rupert
      • Re: Question Regarding the Definition of Cantor's Set, Scott
      • Re: Question Regarding the Definition of Cantor's Set, Rupert
      • Re: Question Regarding the Definition of Cantor's Set, Scott
      • Re: Question Regarding the Definition of Cantor's Set, george
      • Re: Question Regarding the Definition of Cantor's Set, Newberry
      • Re: Question Regarding the Definition of Cantor's Set, george
  • Re: Question Regarding the Definition of Cantor's Set, David C . Ullrich
    • Re: Question Regarding the Definition of Cantor's Set, Scott
      • Re: Question Regarding the Definition of Cantor's Set, David C . Ullrich
      • Re: Question Regarding the Definition of Cantor's Set, Scott
      • Re: Question Regarding the Definition of Cantor's Set, David C . Ullrich
      • Re: Question Regarding the Definition of Cantor's Set, Scott
      • Re: Question Regarding the Definition of Cantor's Set, David C . Ullrich
      • Re: Question Regarding the Definition of Cantor's Set, Scott
      • Re: Question Regarding the Definition of Cantor's Set, David C . Ullrich
      • Re: Question Regarding the Definition of Cantor's Set, Scott
      • Re: Question Regarding the Definition of Cantor's Set, David C . Ullrich
      • Re: Question Regarding the Definition of Cantor's Set, Scott
• Completely lost .., John Jones
  • Re: Completely lost .., Barb Knox
    • Re: Completely lost .., William Elliot
      • Re: Completely lost .., John Jones
    • Re: Completely lost .., John Jones
      • Re: Completely lost .., William Elliot
  • Re: Completely lost .., Frederick Williams
    • Re: Completely lost .., John Jones
• Re: Who Needs Hume's Principle?, george
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Who Needs Hume's Principle?, george
    • Re: Who Needs Hume's Principle?, abo
      • Re: Who Needs Hume's Principle?, george
      • Re: Who Needs Hume's Principle?, abo
      • Re: Who Needs Hume's Principle?, george
      • Re: Who Needs Hume's Principle?, abo
      • Re: Who Needs Hume's Principle?, george
      • Re: Who Needs Hume's Principle?, george
      • Re: Who Needs Hume's Principle?, abo
      • Re: Who Needs Hume's Principle?, george
      • Re: Who Needs Hume's Principle?, george
      • Re: Who Needs Hume's Principle?, george
• Re: Kanamori on Kreisel and Levy on uniform reflection principles, Aatu Koskensilta
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Kanamori on Kreisel and Levy on uniform reflection principles, Aatu Koskensilta
    • Re: Kanamori on Kreisel and Levy on uniform reflection principles, Aatu Koskensilta
• Re: Set Theory: Should You Believe, herbzet
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Set Theory: Should You Believe, herbzet
    • Re: Set Theory: Should You Believe, John Jones
      • Re: Set Theory: Should You Believe, herbzet
• Re: Set theory ZFC is inconsistent., Rupert
  • Re: Set theory ZFC is inconsistent., jaykov
    • Re: Set theory ZFC is inconsistent., Rupert
      • Re: Set theory ZFC is inconsistent., jaykov
      • Re: Set theory ZFC is inconsistent., Rupert
      • Re: Set theory ZFC is inconsistent., jaykov
      • Re: Set theory ZFC is inconsistent., Rupert
      • Re: Set theory ZFC is inconsistent., jaykov
      • Re: Set theory ZFC is inconsistent., Rupert
      • Re: Set theory ZFC is inconsistent., jaykov
      • Re: Set theory ZFC is inconsistent., jaykov
      • Re: Set theory ZFC is inconsistent., Rupert
      • Re: Set theory ZFC is inconsistent., jaykov
      • Re: Set theory ZFC is inconsistent., Rupert
      • Re: Set theory ZFC is inconsistent., jaykov
      • Re: Set theory ZFC is inconsistent., Rupert
      • Re: Set theory ZFC is inconsistent., jaykov
      • Re: Set theory ZFC is inconsistent., Rupert
      • Re: Set theory ZFC is inconsistent., jaykov
      • Re: Set theory ZFC is inconsistent., jaykov
      • Re: Set theory ZFC is inconsistent., Rupert
      • Re: Set theory ZFC is inconsistent., jaykov
      • Re: Set theory ZFC is inconsistent., Rupert
      • Re: Set theory ZFC is inconsistent., jaykov
      • Re: Set theory ZFC is inconsistent., jaykov
      • Re: Set theory ZFC is inconsistent., jaykov
      • Re: Set theory ZFC is inconsistent., Rupert
      • Re: Set theory ZFC is inconsistent., jaykov
      • Re: Set theory ZFC is inconsistent., jaykov
      • Re: Set theory ZFC is inconsistent., Rupert
      • Re: Set theory ZFC is inconsistent., jaykov
      • Re: Set theory ZFC is inconsistent., jaykov
      • Re: Set theory ZFC is inconsistent., jaykov
      • Re: Set theory ZFC is inconsistent., Rupert
      • Re: Set theory ZFC is inconsistent., jaykov
      • Re: Set theory ZFC is inconsistent., Rupert
      • Re: Set theory ZFC is inconsistent., jaykov
      • Re: Set theory ZFC is inconsistent., Rupert
      • Re: Set theory ZFC is inconsistent., jaykov
      • Re: Set theory ZFC is inconsistent., jaykov
      • Re: Set theory ZFC is inconsistent., jaykov
      • Re: Set theory ZFC is inconsistent., jaykov
      • Re: Set theory ZFC is inconsistent., jaykov
      • Re: Set theory ZFC is inconsistent., jaykov
      • Re: Set theory ZFC is inconsistent., jaykov
      • Re: Set theory ZFC is inconsistent., Rupert
      • Re: Set theory ZFC is inconsistent., jaykov
      • Re: Set theory ZFC is inconsistent., Rupert
      • Re: Set theory ZFC is inconsistent., jaykov
      • Re: Set theory ZFC is inconsistent., jaykov
      • Re: Set theory ZFC is inconsistent., Rupert
      • Re: Set theory ZFC is inconsistent., jaykov
      • Re: Set theory ZFC is inconsistent., Rupert
      • Re: Set theory ZFC is inconsistent., jaykov
      • Re: Set theory ZFC is inconsistent., jaykov
      • Re: Set theory ZFC is inconsistent., jaykov
      • Re: Set theory ZFC is inconsistent., jaykov
      • Re: Set theory ZFC is inconsistent., jaykov
      • Re: Set theory ZFC is inconsistent., jaykov
      • Re: Set theory ZFC is inconsistent., jaykov
      • Re: Set theory ZFC is inconsistent., Rupert
      • Re: Set theory ZFC is inconsistent., jaykov
      • Re: Set theory ZFC is inconsistent., jaykov
      • Re: Set theory ZFC is inconsistent., Rupert
      • Re: Set theory ZFC is inconsistent., jaykov
      • Re: Set theory ZFC is inconsistent., jaykov
      • Re: Set theory ZFC is inconsistent., jaykov
      • Re: Set theory ZFC is inconsistent., Rupert
      • Re: Set theory ZFC is inconsistent., jaykov
      • Re: Set theory ZFC is inconsistent., Rupert
      • Re: Set theory ZFC is inconsistent., jaykov
      • Re: Set theory ZFC is inconsistent., jaykov
      • Re: Set theory ZFC is inconsistent., jaykov
      • Re: Set theory ZFC is inconsistent., jaykov
      • Re: Set theory ZFC is inconsistent., jaykov
      • Re: Set theory ZFC is inconsistent., jaykov
      • Re: Set theory ZFC is inconsistent., jaykov
      • Re: Set theory ZFC is inconsistent., jaykov
      • Re: Set theory ZFC is inconsistent., jaykov
      • Re: Set theory ZFC is inconsistent., Rupert
      • Re: Set theory ZFC is inconsistent., Rupert
      • Re: Set theory ZFC is inconsistent., jaykov
      • Re: Set theory ZFC is inconsistent., jaykov
      • Re: Set theory ZFC is inconsistent., jaykov
• Re: The mathematicians Magic Hat., John Jones
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: The mathematicians Magic Hat., The Ghost In The Machine
    • Re: The mathematicians Magic Hat., John Jones
      • Re: The mathematicians Magic Hat., The Ghost In The Machine
• Inside or Outside ?, bargiax
  • Re: Inside or Outside ?, Rupert
    • Re: Inside or Outside ?, bargiax
      • Re: Inside or Outside ?, Rupert
  • Re: Inside or Outside ?, Nam Nguyen
    • Re: Inside or Outside ?, Rupert
      • Re: Inside or Outside ?, Nam Nguyen
      • Re: Inside or Outside ?, Rupert
      • Re: Inside or Outside ?, Nam Nguyen
      • Re: Inside or Outside ?, Nam Nguyen
      • Re: Inside or Outside ?, Jack Campin - bogus address
      • Re: Inside or Outside ?, Rupert
      • Re: Inside or Outside ?, Nam Nguyen
      • Re: Inside or Outside ?, Nam Nguyen
      • Re: Inside or Outside ?, Rupert
      • Re: Inside or Outside ?, Nam Nguyen
      • Re: Inside or Outside ?, Rupert
      • Re: Inside or Outside ?, Nam Nguyen
      • Re: Inside or Outside ?, Rupert
      • Re: Inside or Outside ?, Nam Nguyen
      • Re: Inside or Outside ?, Aatu Koskensilta
      • Re: Inside or Outside ?, Nam Nguyen
      • Re: Inside or Outside ?, Rupert
      • Re: Inside or Outside ?, Rupert
• Question on strength of Robinson's Q, espoors
  • Re: Question on strength of Robinson's Q, Rupert
• An Interesting Subject, theo3
• Re: String and Language, Jan Burse
  • Re: String and Language, John Jones
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: String and Language, John Jones
• Re: FOL & completeness, bargiax
  • Re: FOL & completeness, Aatu Koskensilta
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: FOL & completeness, Rupert
    • Re: FOL & completeness, Frederick Williams
• Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, george
  • Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, abo
    • Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, george
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, george
  • Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, george
    • Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, R. Srinivasan
    • Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, abo
      • Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, george
  • Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, george
    • Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, abo
      • Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, george

We are proud to have Web Hosting and Rack Housing from 9 Net Avenue Deutschland.
(18)