Re: Set theory ZFC is inconsistent.
- From: "Rupert" <rupertmccallum@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 21 Jul 2006 21:01:32 -0700
jaykov wrote:
Rupert wrote:
jaykov wrote:
Yes this is right
Okay, so what do you want to do now?
Definition. <ω>:={X |(Er)(Ap)Q(r,p,X)}, [ω]:=ω union <ω>.
<ω> is actually the set of all arithmetically definable sets. Okay,
fine. What now?
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Set theory ZFC is inconsistent.
- From: jaykov
- Re: Set theory ZFC is inconsistent.
- References:
- Re: Set theory ZFC is inconsistent.
- From: Rupert
- Re: Set theory ZFC is inconsistent.
- From: jaykov
- Re: Set theory ZFC is inconsistent.
- From: Rupert
- Re: Set theory ZFC is inconsistent.
- From: jaykov
- Re: Set theory ZFC is inconsistent.
- From: jaykov
- Re: Set theory ZFC is inconsistent.
- From: Rupert
- Re: Set theory ZFC is inconsistent.
- From: jaykov
- Re: Set theory ZFC is inconsistent.
- Prev by Date: Re: Set theory ZFC is inconsistent.
- Next by Date: Re: Inside or Outside ?
- Previous by thread: Re: Set theory ZFC is inconsistent.
- Next by thread: Re: Set theory ZFC is inconsistent.
- Index(es):