Re: A question about FOL theories and models
- From: "Rupert" <rupertmccallum@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 18 Aug 2006 16:21:17 -0700
Nam Nguyen wrote:
ZF(C), after all, is just one theory out of infinite number
of 1st order ones. (Formally, FOL framework never insists that
we have to know about ZFC to formalize a different theory.)
Assuming we've formalized a theory G of "geometry", how could we prove
that the 5th "postulate" - as an axiom - is unprovable in G, without
mentioning anything about ZF(C)? In other words, how could we possibly
come up with a specific model of G in which the 5th is false? Thanks.
--
If you're going to do model theory, you have to decide what metatheory
you're going to work in. You can prove that there exists a model of
Hilbert's axioms with the parallel postulate negated in fourth-order
Peano arithmetic, and any stronger theory, such as ZFC.
-----------------------------------------------------
What we call 'I' is just a swinging door which moves
when we inhale and exhale.
Shunryu Suzuki
----------------------------------------------------
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: A question about FOL theories and models
- From: MoeBlee
- Re: A question about FOL theories and models
- References:
- A question about FOL theories and models
- From: Nam Nguyen
- A question about FOL theories and models
- Prev by Date: Re: Question about Set Theory
- Next by Date: Re: Question about Set Theory
- Previous by thread: Re: A question about FOL theories and models
- Next by thread: Re: A question about FOL theories and models
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|