Re: Provable in T?
- From: Aatu Koskensilta <aatu.koskensilta@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 19:49:03 +0300
MoeBlee wrote:
Rupert wrote:
Sigma-1-Induction Arithmetic.
Would you give the language and axioms for that?
The theory ISigma_1 is just Robinson arithmetic + induction for Sigma_1 formulas.
How does Sigma-1 induction arithmetic stand in comparison of strength
with PRA and with Robinson arithmetic?
ISigma_1 is stronger than PRA and Robinson arithmetic.
--
Aatu Koskensilta (aatu.koskensilta@xxxxxxxxx)
"Wovon man nicht sprechen kann, daruber muss man schweigen"
- Ludwig Wittgenstein, Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Provable in T?
- From: MoeBlee
- Re: Provable in T?
- References:
- Provable in T?
- From: bargiax
- Re: Provable in T?
- From: Aatu Koskensilta
- Re: Provable in T?
- From: Newberry
- Re: Provable in T?
- From: Aatu Koskensilta
- Re: Provable in T?
- From: Newberry
- Re: Provable in T?
- From: Rupert
- Re: Provable in T?
- From: george
- Re: Provable in T?
- From: Rupert
- Re: Provable in T?
- From: george
- Re: Provable in T?
- From: Rupert
- Re: Provable in T?
- From: george
- Re: Provable in T?
- From: Rupert
- Re: Provable in T?
- From: MoeBlee
- Provable in T?
- Prev by Date: Re: Provable in T?
- Next by Date: Re: Provable in T?
- Previous by thread: Re: Provable in T?
- Next by thread: Re: Provable in T?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|