Re: Provable in T?
- From: "MoeBlee" <jazzmobe@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 21 Aug 2006 10:01:58 -0700
Aatu Koskensilta wrote:
The theory ISigma_1 is just Robinson arithmetic + induction for Sigma_1
formulas.
Would you specify what a Sigma_1 formula is?
ISigma_1 is stronger than PRA and Robinson arithmetic.
What does the 'I' stand for in 'ISigma_1'?
Is ISigma_1 in some sense the least theory to which the incompleteness
theorem applies? Since it's stronger than PRA and Robinson arithmetic,
should I take it that incompleteness does not apply to them? And should
I take it that there's no common theory that is between Robinson
arithmetic and ISigma_1 in terms of strength?
MoeBlee
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Provable in T?
- From: Aatu Koskensilta
- Re: Provable in T?
- From: MoeBlee
- Re: Provable in T?
- References:
- Provable in T?
- From: bargiax
- Re: Provable in T?
- From: Aatu Koskensilta
- Re: Provable in T?
- From: Newberry
- Re: Provable in T?
- From: Aatu Koskensilta
- Re: Provable in T?
- From: Newberry
- Re: Provable in T?
- From: Rupert
- Re: Provable in T?
- From: george
- Re: Provable in T?
- From: Rupert
- Re: Provable in T?
- From: george
- Re: Provable in T?
- From: Rupert
- Re: Provable in T?
- From: george
- Re: Provable in T?
- From: Rupert
- Re: Provable in T?
- From: MoeBlee
- Re: Provable in T?
- From: Aatu Koskensilta
- Provable in T?
- Prev by Date: Re: Provable in T?
- Next by Date: Re: A question about FOL theories and models
- Previous by thread: Re: Provable in T?
- Next by thread: Re: Provable in T?
- Index(es):