Re: A question about FOL theories and models
- From: Aatu Koskensilta <aatu.koskensilta@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2006 01:05:41 +0300
Nam Nguyen wrote:
Consider, for example, the possible situation in which ~GC is
arithmetically (interpreted to be) true, while GC is *also provable*
in Shoenfield's 'N' formal system.
That situation is "possible" only in the sense it's "possible" we're mistaken about pretty much anything, being in reality delusional disembodied brains in vats.
--
Aatu Koskensilta (aatu.koskensilta@xxxxxxxxx)
"Wovon man nicht sprechen kann, daruber muss man schweigen"
- Ludwig Wittgenstein, Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: A question about FOL theories and models
- From: Nam Nguyen
- Re: A question about FOL theories and models
- From: MoeBlee
- Re: A question about FOL theories and models
- References:
- A question about FOL theories and models
- From: Nam Nguyen
- Re: A question about FOL theories and models
- From: tchow
- Re: A question about FOL theories and models
- From: Nam Nguyen
- Re: A question about FOL theories and models
- From: Nam Nguyen
- A question about FOL theories and models
- Prev by Date: Re: A question about FOL theories and models
- Next by Date: Re: Provable in T?
- Previous by thread: Re: A question about FOL theories and models
- Next by thread: Re: A question about FOL theories and models
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|