Re: Question about Basic Law V
- From: Fuckwit <nomail@invalid>
- Date: Mon, 04 Sep 2006 10:26:09 +0200
On 3 Sep 2006 20:41:26 -0700, "Rupert" <rupertmccallum@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
2nd order logic.
You need to clarify further how you are going to get the system to talk
about things like predicates.
See:
[...] If you spell out the details of Frege's system I may be able to
tell you in more detail how this would come out.
http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/frege-logic/
Fuckwit
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Question about Basic Law V
- From: Rupert
- Re: Question about Basic Law V
- References:
- Question about Basic Law V
- From: lugita15
- Re: Question about Basic Law V
- From: Rupert
- Re: Question about Basic Law V
- From: lugita15
- Re: Question about Basic Law V
- From: Rupert
- Question about Basic Law V
- Prev by Date: Re: Godel up the junction
- Next by Date: Re: Question about Basic Law V
- Previous by thread: Re: Question about Basic Law V
- Next by thread: Re: Question about Basic Law V
- Index(es):