Re: "Godel got it all wrong"
- From: "Peter_Smith" <ps218@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 11 Sep 2006 23:30:52 -0700
Herman Jurjus wrote:
Perfectly ok; thanks for the elucidation.
How would one get/prove negation completeness?
Do forgive me taking the short way out on this. Go to download page at
www.godelbook.net; have a look at Section 8.2 and then Section 12.3 on
PRA_0. Cheers, Peter
.
- References:
- "Godel got it all wrong"
- From: Peter_Smith
- Re: "Godel got it all wrong"
- From: Newberry
- Re: "Godel got it all wrong"
- From: Peter_Smith
- Re: "Godel got it all wrong"
- From: Newberry
- Re: "Godel got it all wrong"
- From: Peter_Smith
- Re: "Godel got it all wrong"
- From: MoeBlee
- Re: "Godel got it all wrong"
- From: Peter_Smith
- Re: "Godel got it all wrong"
- From: MoeBlee
- Re: "Godel got it all wrong"
- From: MoeBlee
- Re: "Godel got it all wrong"
- From: Peter_Smith
- Re: "Godel got it all wrong"
- From: Herman Jurjus
- Re: "Godel got it all wrong"
- From: Peter_Smith
- Re: "Godel got it all wrong"
- From: Herman Jurjus
- "Godel got it all wrong"
- Prev by Date: Re: Categorical model of N?
- Next by Date: Re: "Godel got it all wrong"
- Previous by thread: Re: "Godel got it all wrong"
- Next by thread: Re: "Godel got it all wrong"
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|