Re: Question about Frege's Theorem
- From: Chris Menzel <cmenzel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 25 Sep 2006 15:32:21 GMT
On 24 Sep 2006 09:43:14 -0700, Peter_Smith <ps218@xxxxxxxxx> said:
lugita15@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
So *is* Henkin Semantics useless?
No, but we need the restriction to faithful models. Check out Shapiro,
as his is the classic modern treatment of this stuff and very clear.
Enderton's classic text _A Mathematical Introduction to Logic_ also has
a nice overview of 2nd-order languages with both standard semantics and
general semantics.
.
- References:
- Question about Frege's Theorem
- From: lugita15
- Re: Question about Frege's Theorem
- From: Peter_Smith
- Re: Question about Frege's Theorem
- From: lugita15
- Re: Question about Frege's Theorem
- From: Peter_Smith
- Re: Question about Frege's Theorem
- From: lugita15
- Re: Question about Frege's Theorem
- From: Peter_Smith
- Re: Question about Frege's Theorem
- From: lugita15
- Re: Question about Frege's Theorem
- From: Peter_Smith
- Question about Frege's Theorem
- Prev by Date: Re: Computability and logic
- Next by Date: Re: Question on Counterfactual Conditionals
- Previous by thread: Re: Question about Frege's Theorem
- Next by thread: Re: Question about Frege's Theorem
- Index(es):