Re: Mathematical strings
- From: "John Jones" <jonescardiff@xxxxxxx>
- Date: 27 Sep 2006 01:55:02 -0700
MoeBlee wrote:
Some of us keep trying to get through to you that symbols are not
necessarily to be regarded as objects that are visual displays. A
visual display may be a rendering or a way of presenting a symbol or a
string of symbols, but we may regard the symbols and strings themselves
to be abstract objects that are not the same as their visual display in
the form of such things as written characters.
I'm sure any of us could think up a lot of stuff.
MoeBlee
Thankyou for your reply. As my answer is ground-breaking I thought I
would start a new post with it. My estimate for the number of
replies/authors it shall receive is two -mathematicians are never
interested in foundations, especially on sci.logic. I am the Darwin of
mathematical belief.
.
- References:
- Mathematical strings
- From: John Jones
- Re: Mathematical strings
- From: David C . Ullrich
- Re: Mathematical strings
- From: John Jones
- Re: Mathematical strings
- From: MoeBlee
- Re: Mathematical strings
- From: John Jones
- Re: Mathematical strings
- From: MoeBlee
- Re: Mathematical strings
- From: John Jones
- Re: Mathematical strings
- From: MoeBlee
- Mathematical strings
- Prev by Date: Re: Goldbach Conjecture & the Foundation of First Order Logic.
- Next by Date: Foundations of Mathematics
- Previous by thread: Re: Mathematical strings
- Next by thread: Re: Mathematical strings
- Index(es):