Re: Goldbach Conjecture & the Foundation of First Order Logic.
- From: Nam Nguyen <namducnguyen@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 13:20:29 GMT
Aatu Koskensilta wrote:
Nam Nguyen wrote:
1) If GC is *genuinely* true, it will be impossible to (informally and
arithmetically) know that. Equivalently, it will be impossible
to know a proof of GC in "PA".
2) If GC is *genuinely* false, it's still possible that it's impossible
to prove that in PA.
How do "*genuine*" truth and "*genuine*" falsity differ from ordinary truth and falsity in case of Pi-1 sentences in the language of arithmetic?
To be frank, I don't think there is any truth or falsity in the language
of arithmetic, or the *language* of anything, for that matter.
--
-----------------------------------------------------
What we call 'I' is just a swinging door which moves
when we inhale and exhale.
Shunryu Suzuki
----------------------------------------------------
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Goldbach Conjecture & the Foundation of First Order Logic.
- From: Nam Nguyen
- Re: Goldbach Conjecture & the Foundation of First Order Logic.
- References:
- Goldbach Conjecture & the Foundation of First Order Logic.
- From: Nam Nguyen
- Re: Goldbach Conjecture & the Foundation of First Order Logic.
- From: Aatu Koskensilta
- Goldbach Conjecture & the Foundation of First Order Logic.
- Prev by Date: Re: Computability and logic
- Next by Date: Re: Goldbach Conjecture & the Foundation of First Order Logic.
- Previous by thread: Re: Goldbach Conjecture & the Foundation of First Order Logic.
- Next by thread: Re: Goldbach Conjecture & the Foundation of First Order Logic.
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|