Re: My investigations into Godels Incompleteness Theorem
- From: "John Jones" <jonescardiff@xxxxxxx>
- Date: 29 Sep 2006 11:21:14 -0700
Daryl McCullough wrote:
John Jones says...
I need to know the nature of "correspondence". It seems to be crucial
to the enterprise.
It is crucial to the enterprise of *communication*. When
you want to express a sentence on a USENET newsgroup, you
must type a sequence of characters on your keyboard. So
there must be a correspondence between sentences and
character sequences.
You already know this, otherwise you wouldn't be attempting
to communicate using a keyboard.
--
Daryl McCullough
Ithaca, NY
It seems that "correspondence" is a single state that exhibits two
independent identities. I can therefore say that a sentence has both
sense and structure and that sense and structure are independent of
each other. So using your example, a sentence can have sense, and also
have keyboard character sequence or structure.
Godel says that a sentence has a string (which is arguable). Really, he
should not then go on to use the sense (theorem) of that sentence as if
it was the sentence itself.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: My investigations into Godels Incompleteness Theorem
- From: Peter_Smith
- Re: My investigations into Godels Incompleteness Theorem
- From: Daryl McCullough
- Re: My investigations into Godels Incompleteness Theorem
- References:
- Re: My investigations into Godels Incompleteness Theorem
- From: John Jones
- Re: My investigations into Godels Incompleteness Theorem
- From: Daryl McCullough
- Re: My investigations into Godels Incompleteness Theorem
- Prev by Date: Re: Computability and logic
- Next by Date: Re: My investigations into Godels Incompleteness Theorem
- Previous by thread: Re: My investigations into Godels Incompleteness Theorem
- Next by thread: Re: My investigations into Godels Incompleteness Theorem
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|