Re: My investigations into Godels Incompleteness Theorem
- From: stevendaryl3016@xxxxxxxxx (Daryl McCullough)
- Date: 29 Sep 2006 15:36:49 -0700
John Jones says...
When you make a string you lose the sense of the of the sentence and
merely address individual signs. What you are claiming is that the
meaning of a sentence is exhibited in its string, which is simply not
true.
I did not say that. What I said was
For any sentence S in the language of arithmetic,
if the string corresponding to S has property P,
then S is a theorem.
Do you agree, or not? If not, give me a counterexample.
--
Daryl McCullough
Ithaca, NY
.
- References:
- Re: My investigations into Godels Incompleteness Theorem
- From: John Jones
- Re: My investigations into Godels Incompleteness Theorem
- Prev by Date: Re: My investigations into Godels Incompleteness Theorem
- Next by Date: Re: My investigations into Godels Incompleteness Theorem
- Previous by thread: Re: My investigations into Godels Incompleteness Theorem
- Next by thread: Re: My investigations into Godels Incompleteness Theorem
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|