Re: The L3 Revolution
- From: William Elliot <marsh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2006 19:59:38 -0700
On Tue, 24 Oct 2006, Confutus wrote:
Apparently, if I want three-valued logic to take its rightful place andSince your draft isn't posted here, but there for your convenience, my
its revolutionary implications to be recognized, I have to become a
revolutionary. And a revolution needs a pamphlet, a tract, a manifesto
of some kind. So, read a draft of it at
http://www.sapiencekb.com/logic3rev.htm
comments can not be put under your statements where they will be best
understood. Some tables weren't clear and you didn't define theorem.
For better scrutiny, post here where I can make comments instead of there
where comments aren't possible.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: The L3 Revolution
- From: Confutus
- Re: The L3 Revolution
- From: Confutus
- Re: The L3 Revolution
- References:
- The L3 Revolution
- From: Confutus
- The L3 Revolution
- Prev by Date: The L3 Revolution
- Next by Date: Re: Halting Problem for Humans
- Previous by thread: The L3 Revolution
- Next by thread: Re: The L3 Revolution
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|