Re: incompleteness and inconsistency
- From: "Peter_Smith" <ps218@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 3 Nov 2006 00:05:43 -0800
lugita15@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
the original
poster wanted to know whether it is possible to know the consistency of
PA with *absolute certainty*.
A very interesting bit of mind-reading :) The original poster didn't
mention "certainty" at all, let alone "absolute certainty" (whatever
exactly that might be). He asked whether we can *know* that PA is
consistent. Which we can.
There are familiar philosophical riffs that try to get us from fanciful
or neurotic worries about "absolute certainty" that P to doubting
whether we know that P. For example, we can make play with the old
familiar fantasies of evil demons and brains-in-vats, and end up with
student-confusing arguments that seem to show that, e.g., you can't
know that you are reading words right now. But those arguments can and
should be resisted: of course, we *do* know such things in the everyday
sense of "know" (and why should we care about other senses?).
And what goes for the putative inference from "no absolute certainty"
to "no knowledge" for thoughts about your reading right now, goes for
thoughts about arithmetic.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: incompleteness and inconsistency
- From: george
- Re: incompleteness and inconsistency
- From: abo
- Re: incompleteness and inconsistency
- References:
- incompleteness and inconsistency
- From: Per Freem
- Re: incompleteness and inconsistency
- From: lugita15
- Re: incompleteness and inconsistency
- From: Peter_Smith
- Re: incompleteness and inconsistency
- From: Nam Nguyen
- Re: incompleteness and inconsistency
- From: lugita15
- Re: incompleteness and inconsistency
- From: Peter_Smith
- Re: incompleteness and inconsistency
- From: lugita15
- Re: incompleteness and inconsistency
- From: Peter_Smith
- Re: incompleteness and inconsistency
- From: lugita15
- Re: incompleteness and inconsistency
- From: Chris Menzel
- Re: incompleteness and inconsistency
- From: lugita15
- incompleteness and inconsistency
- Prev by Date: fallacy of (denying hypothesis)/(affirming conclusion)
- Next by Date: Re: incompleteness and inconsistency
- Previous by thread: Re: incompleteness and inconsistency
- Next by thread: Re: incompleteness and inconsistency
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading