Re: Existence, Self-identity and Uniqueness.



Owen wrote:

Jan Burse wrote:
>>But when Fx has not a unique x, then A(the x:Fx)
>>becomes false.
> Yes. A(the x:Fx) -> E!(the x:Fx), implies,
> ~E!(the x:Fx) -> ~A(the x:Fx).

Not always. It really depends what A is in
the current course. I am using the letter A
here to stand for a formula and not for a
predicate.

That A stands for a formula and not for a
predicate, is also the intention of "x=y
-> (A(x) <-> A(y))". In FOL= this substitution
law for formulas can be derived from the
following more basic substition laws:

x1=y1 & .. & xn=yn -> (R(x1,..,xn)->R(y1,..,yn)) (1)
x1=y1 & .. & xn=yn -> (f(x1,..,xn)=f(y1,..,yn)) (2)

Here in (1) the letter R stands for a predicate.
And in (2) the letter f stands for a function.
But in my discussion the A was standing for
a formula.

For example the following formula A does not behave
as you stated (call it A1):

A1(x) :<=> true.

We do not have:

~A1(the x:Fx)

when Fx is not unique.

Note also that in my post, where I showed that
FOL= gets inconsistent, I am also using a particular
A (call it A0). And you have really to go into
A0 to descide A0(the x:Fx).

Bye
.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: Negating Quantifiers
    ... However, that predicate isn't implied by any non-contradictory sentences, and: ... The remainder is my opinion of your effort to prove that Peano arithmetic is inconsistent, which doesn't directly relate to the subject line but seems to come up in every one of your threads sooner or later. ... What I can and cannot prove is restricted by the necessary implications of whatever set of axioms I build my proofs on. ... To the best of my knowledge, none of the axioms of Peano arithmetic or first-order logic amount to "Peano arithmetic is consistent." ...
    (sci.logic)
  • Re: MV Keys
    ... Brian Selzer wrote: ... "x is 2" is not a sentence in the contex of FOL. ... well (a predicate can be a variable). ... you're saying that an element of a relation doesn't have a truth value? ...
    (comp.databases.theory)
  • Re: MV Keys
    ... "x is 2" is not a sentence in the contex of FOL. ... well (a predicate can be a variable). ... some predicate (which is an element of a FOL language). ... you're saying that an element of a relation doesn't have a truth value? ...
    (comp.databases.theory)
  • Re: Another view on analysis and ER
    ... My question is when should one choose to represent (in FOL if one so ... desires) something as a thing, as in Exists x, or as a predicate, X. ... First one is marriage as a predicate, the second one the marriage as a ... zooming in on a fractal. ...
    (comp.databases.theory)
  • Re: Another view on analysis and ER
    ... identification of a marriage. ... A relationship is a predicate, ... My question is when should one choose to represent (in FOL if one so ... Institution(x, Church)] ...
    (comp.databases.theory)

Quantcast