Re: The Difference between a Set and an Element
- From: "Paul Holbach" <paulholbachDELETETHENAME@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 17 Jan 2007 13:57:21 -0800
G. Frege schrieb:
On 17 Jan 2007 10:49:03 -0800, "Paul Holbach" <paulholbachDELETETHENAME@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
The concept corresponding to an infinite arbitrary set would be
infinitely disjunctive, and hence not be finitely expressible.
???
For example, the concept corresponding to the finite arbitrary
collection {1, 12, 345, 9536, 27364, 876453} is <x = 1 v x = 12 v x =
345 v x = 9536 v x = 27364 v x = 876453>.
Now just imagine an infinite arbitrary collection of natural numbers
and its corresponding concept:
<x = ... v ... v x= ... v ...>
It contains infinitely many disjuncts.
#PH
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: The Difference between a Set and an Element
- From: G . Frege
- Re: The Difference between a Set and an Element
- References:
- Re: The Difference between a Set and an Element
- From: Nam D. Nguyen
- Re: The Difference between a Set and an Element
- From: Peter_Smith
- Re: The Difference between a Set and an Element
- From: Nam D. Nguyen
- Re: The Difference between a Set and an Element
- From: Chris Menzel
- Re: The Difference between a Set and an Element
- From: Paul Holbach
- Re: The Difference between a Set and an Element
- From: Chris Menzel
- Re: The Difference between a Set and an Element
- From: G . Frege
- Re: The Difference between a Set and an Element
- From: Paul Holbach
- Re: The Difference between a Set and an Element
- From: G . Frege
- Re: The Difference between a Set and an Element
- From: Paul Holbach
- Re: The Difference between a Set and an Element
- From: G . Frege
- Re: The Difference between a Set and an Element
- Prev by Date: Re: diagonalization and Axiom of Choice
- Next by Date: Re: The Difference between a Set and an Element
- Previous by thread: Re: The Difference between a Set and an Element
- Next by thread: Re: The Difference between a Set and an Element
- Index(es):
Loading