Re: Goedel's proof
- From: "Peter_Smith" <ps218@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 28 Jan 2007 01:22:28 -0800
On 28 Jan, 02:54, "Newberry" <newbe...@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I am not convinced that it is a proof by the diagonal argument.
We certainly can give rather general/abstract characterizations in
terms of which Gödel's argument involves a diagonal construction. But
of course, it all depends exactly what you mean by a diagonal
argument: you give us a reasonably precise definition of what counts
as a diagonal argument and then we can see whether Gödel's original
proof counts as a diagonal argument in that sense!
.
- References:
- Goedel's proof
- From: Newberry
- Re: Goedel's proof
- From: Peter_Smith
- Re: Goedel's proof
- From: aatu . koskensilta
- Re: Goedel's proof
- From: Newberry
- Goedel's proof
- Prev by Date: the universe
- Next by Date: israel
- Previous by thread: Re: Goedel's proof
- Next by thread: Re: Goedel's proof
- Index(es):