# sci.logic

**hi**,*ahire . vaibhav***What could be reasoned from one proposition "A is B"?**,*Conbra***Elementary equivalence and elementary substructures**,*mordov***Call for Papers with Extended Deadline: WORLDCOMP'07 (June 25-28, 2007, Las Vegas, USA): conferences in computer science, computer engineering, and applied computing**,*A. M. G. Solo***Re: THE SUBTLE FRAUD OF RELATIVITY**,*Ross A. Finlayson***A theory**,*Ross A. Finlayson***Re: A theory**,*Charlie-Boo*

**The set of all JOKES.....**,*charleswehner@xxxxxxxxxxx***Re: The set of all JOKES.....**,*John Jones***Re: The set of all JOKES.....**,*charleswehner@xxxxxxxxxxx***Re: The set of all JOKES.....**,*John Jones***Re: The set of all JOKES.....**,*charleswehner@xxxxxxxxxxx***Re: The set of all JOKES.....**,*John Jones***Re: The set of all JOKES.....**,*charleswehner@xxxxxxxxxxx***Re: The set of all JOKES.....**,*John Jones***Re: The set of all JOKES.....**,*LauLuna***Re: The set of all JOKES.....**,*charleswehner@xxxxxxxxxxx***Re: The set of all JOKES.....**,*LauLuna***Re: The set of all JOKES.....**,*LauLuna***Re: The set of all JOKES.....**,*LauLuna*

**wittgensteins Tractarian logic any suggestions.?**,*translogi***Re: wittgensteins Tractarian logic any suggestions.?**,*G . Frege***Re: wittgensteins Tractarian logic any suggestions.?**,*John Jones***Re: wittgensteins Tractarian logic any suggestions.?**,*G . Frege***Re: wittgensteins Tractarian logic any suggestions.?**,*Jan Burse***Re: wittgensteins Tractarian logic any suggestions.?**,*G . Frege***Re: wittgensteins Tractarian logic any suggestions.?**,*translogi***Re: wittgensteins Tractarian logic any suggestions.?**,*G . Frege***Re: wittgensteins Tractarian logic any suggestions.?**,*G . Frege***Re: wittgensteins Tractarian logic any suggestions.?**,*John Jones*

**Re: wittgensteins Tractarian logic any suggestions.?**,*G . Frege*

**Re: Canonical form with NOR or NAND?**,*Jack W.***"A Glitch in The Matrix Exists"**,*newstips6706***Stuck on a logic problem**,*Snis Pilbor***Re: Stuck on a logic problem**,*Peter_Smith*

**CSL07 (11-15 September, 2007, Lausanne): Call for papers**,*alessandro . facchini***OUTGOEDELING A HUMAN?**,*LauLuna***Re: OUTGOEDELING A HUMAN?**,*LauLuna***Re: OUTGOEDELING A HUMAN?**,*Daryl McCullough***Re: OUTGOEDELING A HUMAN?**,*Charlie-Boo*

**Re: OUTGOEDELING A HUMAN?**,*Daryl McCullough***Re: OUTGOEDELING A HUMAN?**,*george***Re: OUTGOEDELING A HUMAN?**,*Aatu Koskensilta***Re: OUTGOEDELING A HUMAN?**,*Daryl McCullough***Re: OUTGOEDELING A HUMAN?**,*Aatu Koskensilta***Re: OUTGOEDELING A HUMAN?**,*Daryl McCullough***Re: OUTGOEDELING A HUMAN?**,*abo***Re: OUTGOEDELING A HUMAN?**,*Daryl McCullough***Re: OUTGOEDELING A HUMAN?**,*abo***Re: OUTGOEDELING A HUMAN?**,*Daryl McCullough***Re: OUTGOEDELING A HUMAN?**,*abo***Re: OUTGOEDELING A HUMAN?**,*Daryl McCullough***Re: OUTGOEDELING A HUMAN?**,*abo***Re: OUTGOEDELING A HUMAN?**,*David Marcus***Re: OUTGOEDELING A HUMAN?**,*Daryl McCullough***Re: OUTGOEDELING A HUMAN?**,*abo***Re: OUTGOEDELING A HUMAN?**,*Daryl McCullough***Re: OUTGOEDELING A HUMAN?**,*abo***Re: OUTGOEDELING A HUMAN?**,*Daryl McCullough***Re: OUTGOEDELING A HUMAN?**,*abo***Re: OUTGOEDELING A HUMAN?**,*Daryl McCullough***Re: OUTGOEDELING A HUMAN?**,*abo***Re: OUTGOEDELING A HUMAN?**,*Daryl McCullough***Re: OUTGOEDELING A HUMAN?**,*LauLuna***Re: OUTGOEDELING A HUMAN?**,*Daryl McCullough***Re: OUTGOEDELING A HUMAN?**,*LauLuna***Re: OUTGOEDELING A HUMAN?**,*LauLuna***Re: OUTGOEDELING A HUMAN?**,*Daryl McCullough***Re: OUTGOEDELING A HUMAN?**,*LauLuna***Re: OUTGOEDELING A HUMAN?**,*Daryl McCullough***Re: OUTGOEDELING A HUMAN?**,*abo***Re: OUTGOEDELING A HUMAN?**,*Daryl McCullough***Re: OUTGOEDELING A HUMAN?**,*abo***Re: OUTGOEDELING A HUMAN?**,*Daryl McCullough***Re: OUTGOEDELING A HUMAN?**,*LauLuna***Re: OUTGOEDELING A HUMAN?**,*Daryl McCullough***Re: OUTGOEDELING A HUMAN?**,*Daryl McCullough***Re: OUTGOEDELING A HUMAN?**,*LauLuna***Re: OUTGOEDELING A HUMAN?**,*Daryl McCullough***Re: OUTGOEDELING A HUMAN?**,*aatu . koskensilta***Re: OUTGOEDELING A HUMAN?**,*LauLuna***Re: OUTGOEDELING A HUMAN?**,*aatu . koskensilta***Re: OUTGOEDELING A HUMAN?**,*aatu . koskensilta***Re: OUTGOEDELING A HUMAN?**,*Nam D. Nguyen***Re: OUTGOEDELING A HUMAN?**,*Daryl McCullough***Re: OUTGOEDELING A HUMAN?**,*Nam D. Nguyen***Re: OUTGOEDELING A HUMAN?**,*Daryl McCullough***Re: OUTGOEDELING A HUMAN?**,*Nam D. Nguyen***Re: OUTGOEDELING A HUMAN?**,*Daryl McCullough***Re: OUTGOEDELING A HUMAN?**,*Nam D. Nguyen***Re: OUTGOEDELING A HUMAN?**,*Daryl McCullough***Re: OUTGOEDELING A HUMAN?**,*Nam D. Nguyen***Re: OUTGOEDELING A HUMAN?**,*Daryl McCullough***Re: OUTGOEDELING A HUMAN?**,*herbzet***Re: OUTGOEDELING A HUMAN?**,*Nam D. Nguyen***Re: OUTGOEDELING A HUMAN?**,*herbzet***Re: OUTGOEDELING A HUMAN?**,*Nam D. Nguyen***Re: OUTGOEDELING A HUMAN?**,*aatu . koskensilta***Re: OUTGOEDELING A HUMAN?**,*David Marcus***Re: OUTGOEDELING A HUMAN?**,*LauLuna***Re: OUTGOEDELING A HUMAN?**,*Daryl McCullough***Re: OUTGOEDELING A HUMAN?**,*LauLuna***Re: OUTGOEDELING A HUMAN?**,*aatu . koskensilta*

**Re: OUTGOEDELING A HUMAN?**,*Daryl McCullough***Re: OUTGOEDELING A HUMAN?**,*LauLuna***Re: OUTGOEDELING A HUMAN?**,*Daryl McCullough***Re: OUTGOEDELING A HUMAN?**,*LauLuna***Re: OUTGOEDELING A HUMAN?**,*Daryl McCullough*

**Re: OUTGOEDELING A HUMAN?**,*John Jones***Re: OUTGOEDELING A HUMAN?**,*LauLuna*

**Re: OUTGOEDELING A HUMAN?**,*Charlie-Boo***Re: OUTGOEDELING A HUMAN?**,*LauLuna*

**Re: OUTGOEDELING A HUMAN?**,*John Jones*

**The Day I Met the Liar**,*Indoarsman***Re: The Day I Met the Liar**,*John Jones*

**Causality in sample space**,*Mike***Re: Causality in sample space**,*John Jones*

**Fractional cardinality?**,*Frederick Williams***Re: E=mc2 and British Nobel Laureate Frederick Soddi**,*Frederick Williams***Is wittgensteins colour exclusion problem formalizable?**,*translogi***Re: Is wittgensteins colour exclusion problem formalizable?**,*Aatu Koskensilta***Re: Is wittgensteins colour exclusion problem formalizable?**,*John Jones***Re: Is wittgensteins colour exclusion problem formalizable?**,*translogi***Re: Is wittgensteins colour exclusion problem formalizable?**,*John Jones***Re: Is wittgensteins colour exclusion problem formalizable?**,*translogi***Re: Is wittgensteins colour exclusion problem formalizable?**,*John Jones***Re: Is wittgensteins colour exclusion problem formalizable?**,*translogi***Re: Is wittgensteins colour exclusion problem formalizable?**,*John Jones***Re: Is wittgensteins colour exclusion problem formalizable?**,*translogi***Re: Is wittgensteins colour exclusion problem formalizable?**,*John Jones***Re: Is wittgensteins colour exclusion problem formalizable?**,*translogi***Re: Is wittgensteins colour exclusion problem formalizable?**,*John Jones***Re: Is wittgensteins colour exclusion problem formalizable?**,*translogi***Re: Is wittgensteins colour exclusion problem formalizable?**,*John Jones***Re: Is wittgensteins colour exclusion problem formalizable?**,*translogi*

**Re: Is wittgensteins colour exclusion problem formalizable?**,*J P*

**Recursive within enumerable?**,*Bill Taylor***Re: Recursive within enumerable?**,*Chris Menzel***Re: Recursive within enumerable?**,*Daryl McCullough***Re: Recursive within enumerable?**,*Peter_Smith***Re: Recursive within enumerable?**,*Bill Taylor***Re: Recursive within enumerable?**,*Frederick Williams*

**HealthCare Lab Professionals**,*lab***Lab Professionals**,*lab***Axiomatic set theory is still contradictory**,*victor72***Re: Axiomatic set theory is still contradictory**,*Nam D. Nguyen***Re: Axiomatic set theory is still contradictory**,*David C . Ullrich***Re: Axiomatic set theory is still contradictory**,*victor72***Re: Axiomatic set theory is still contradictory**,*MoeBlee***Re: Axiomatic set theory is still contradictory**,*David C . Ullrich*

**Re: Axiomatic set theory is still contradictory**,*Fuckwit***Re: Axiomatic set theory is still contradictory**,*MoeBlee***Re: Axiomatic set theory is still contradictory**,*ken.quirici@xxxxxxxxxx***Re: Axiomatic set theory is still contradictory**,*george***Re: Axiomatic set theory is still contradictory**,*george***Re: Axiomatic set theory is still contradictory**,*MoeBlee***Re: Axiomatic set theory is still contradictory**,*Charlie-Boo***Re: Axiomatic set theory is still contradictory**,*johnny.tooloose***Re: Axiomatic set theory is still contradictory**,*johnny.tooloose*

**Book with this proof system for propositional logic**,*G Patel***Is Truth Mysterious?**,*LauLuna***Re: Is Truth Mysterious?**,*Daryl McCullough***Re: Is Truth Mysterious?**,*LauLuna***Re: Is Truth Mysterious?**,*Daryl McCullough***Re: Is Truth Mysterious?**,*LauLuna***Re: Is Truth Mysterious?**,*David Marcus***Re: Is Truth Mysterious?**,*Daryl McCullough***Re: Is Truth Mysterious?**,*LauLuna***Re: Is Truth Mysterious?**,*Daryl McCullough***Re: Is Truth Mysterious?**,*LauLuna***Re: Is Truth Mysterious?**,*Daryl McCullough***Re: Is Truth Mysterious?**,*LauLuna***Re: Is Truth Mysterious?**,*Daryl McCullough***Re: Is Truth Mysterious?**,*LauLuna***Re: Is Truth Mysterious?**,*Daryl McCullough***Re: Is Truth Mysterious?**,*LauLuna***Re: Is Truth Mysterious?**,*Daryl McCullough***Re: Is Truth Mysterious?**,*David Marcus***Re: Is Truth Mysterious?**,*LauLuna***Re: Is Truth Mysterious?**,*David Marcus***Re: Is Truth Mysterious?**,*herbzet*

**Re: Is Truth Mysterious?**,*herbzet***Re: Is Truth Mysterious?**,*LauLuna***Re: Is Truth Mysterious?**,*herbzet***Re: Is Truth Mysterious?**,*David Marcus***Re: Is Truth Mysterious?**,*herbzet***Re: Is Truth Mysterious?**,*David Marcus***Re: Is Truth Mysterious?**,*David Marcus***Re: Is Truth Mysterious?**,*herbzet***Re: Is Truth Mysterious?**,*David Marcus***Re: Is Truth Mysterious?**,*herbzet***Re: Is Truth Mysterious?**,*David Marcus***Re: Is Truth Mysterious?**,*David Marcus***Re: Is Truth Mysterious?**,*herbzet***Re: Is Truth Mysterious?**,*David Marcus***Re: Is Truth Mysterious?**,*herbzet***Re: Is Truth Mysterious?**,*LauLuna*

**Re: Is Truth Mysterious?**,*george***Re: Is Truth Mysterious?**,*LauLuna*

**Re: Is Truth Mysterious?**,*Neil W Rickert***Re: Is Truth Mysterious?**,*LauLuna***Re: Is Truth Mysterious?**,*Neil W Rickert***Re: Is Truth Mysterious?**,*LauLuna*

**Re: Is Truth Mysterious?**,*galathaea***Re: Is Truth Mysterious?**,*herbzet***Re: Is Truth Mysterious?**,*herbzet*

**Re: Is Truth Mysterious?**,*george***Re: Is Truth Mysterious?**,*G . Frege***Re: Is Truth Mysterious?**,*G . Frege*

- <Possible follow-ups>
**Is Truth Mysterious?**,*LauLuna*

**Question about hypothetical syllogism**,*Newberry***Re: Question about hypothetical syllogism**,*G . Frege***Re: Question about hypothetical syllogism**,*Newberry***Re: Question about hypothetical syllogism**,*G . Frege***Re: Question about hypothetical syllogism**,*G . Frege***Re: Question about hypothetical syllogism**,*translogi***Re: Question about hypothetical syllogism**,*G . Frege***Re: Question about hypothetical syllogism**,*G . Frege***Re: Question about hypothetical syllogism**,*G . Frege***Re: Question about hypothetical syllogism**,*Newberry***Re: Question about hypothetical syllogism**,*G . Frege***Re: Question about hypothetical syllogism**,*Newberry***Re: Question about hypothetical syllogism**,*G . Frege***Re: Question about hypothetical syllogism**,*Newberry*

**Re: Question about hypothetical syllogism**,*G . Frege***Re: Question about hypothetical syllogism**,*translogi***Re: Question about hypothetical syllogism**,*G . Frege***Re: Question about hypothetical syllogism**,*G . Frege***Re: Question about hypothetical syllogism**,*G . Frege***Re: Question about hypothetical syllogism**,*Jan Burse***Re: Question about hypothetical syllogism**,*Jan Burse***Re: Question about hypothetical syllogism**,*Jan Burse***Re: Question about hypothetical syllogism**,*G . Frege***Re: Question about hypothetical syllogism**,*G . Frege***Re: Question about hypothetical syllogism**,*Jan Burse***Re: Question about hypothetical syllogism**,*G . Frege***Re: Question about hypothetical syllogism**,*Jan Burse***Re: Question about hypothetical syllogism**,*G . Frege***Re: Question about hypothetical syllogism**,*G . Frege***Re: Question about hypothetical syllogism**,*G . Frege***Re: Question about hypothetical syllogism**,*G . Frege*

**Re: You are all smart: what's the damned answer?**,*John Jones**Message not available***Re: You are all smart: what's the damned answer?**,*John Jones*

- <Possible follow-ups>
**Re: You are all smart: what's the damned answer?**,*Jan Burse*

**Problem on Closed intervals Algorithm...Challenge!**,*jake***Lorentz Contraction**,*John Jones***Re: Lorentz Contraction**,*William Elliot*

**Re: The PICTURE LANGUAGE known as "Mathematics"**,*Frederick Williams***The Power Set Reduced**,*victor72***Re: The Power Set Reduced**,*Frederick Williams***Re: The Power Set Reduced**,*george***Re: The Power Set Reduced**,*LauLuna***Re: The Power Set Reduced**,*MoeBlee***Re: The Power Set Reduced**,*Frederick Williams***Re: The Power Set Reduced**,*Aatu Koskensilta*

**Re: The Power Set Reduced**,*george***Re: The Power Set Reduced**,*MoeBlee***Re: The Power Set Reduced**,*george***Re: The Power Set Reduced**,*G . Frege***Re: The Power Set Reduced**,*george***Re: The Power Set Reduced**,*MoeBlee***Re: The Power Set Reduced**,*Aatu Koskensilta***Re: The Power Set Reduced**,*MoeBlee***Re: The Power Set Reduced**,*Aatu Koskensilta***Re: The Power Set Reduced**,*MoeBlee***Re: The Power Set Reduced**,*george***Re: The Power Set Reduced**,*herbzet***Re: The Power Set Reduced**,*David Marcus***Re: The Power Set Reduced**,*Aatu Koskensilta*

**Re: The Power Set Reduced**,*Frederick Williams***Re: The Power Set Reduced**,*MoeBlee***Re: The Power Set Reduced**,*Chris Menzel***Re: The Power Set Reduced**,*MoeBlee*

**Interesting algorithm...need insights..**,*hank***Inconsistent = all sentences provable?**,*jackbatlin***Re: Inconsistent = all sentences provable?**,*Peter_Smith***Re: Inconsistent = all sentences provable?**,*Charlie-Boo***Re: Inconsistent = all sentences provable?**,*Aatu Koskensilta***Re: Inconsistent = all sentences provable?**,*Charlie-Boo***Re: Inconsistent = all sentences provable?**,*aatu . koskensilta*

**Re: Inconsistent = all sentences provable?**,*aatu . koskensilta***Re: Inconsistent = all sentences provable?**,*Charlie-Boo***Re: Inconsistent = all sentences provable?**,*Aatu Koskensilta***Re: Inconsistent = all sentences provable?**,*Charlie-Boo***Re: Inconsistent = all sentences provable?**,*aatu . koskensilta*

**Re: Inconsistent = all sentences provable?**,*G . Frege***Re: Inconsistent = all sentences provable?**,*george***Re: Inconsistent = all sentences provable?**,*Peter_Smith***Re: Inconsistent = all sentences provable?**,*G . Frege***Re: Inconsistent = all sentences provable?**,*george***Re: Inconsistent = all sentences provable?**,*Peter_Smith***Re: Inconsistent = all sentences provable?**,*Peter_Smith***Re: Inconsistent = all sentences provable?**,*george***Re: Inconsistent = all sentences provable?**,*Peter_Smith***Re: Inconsistent = all sentences provable?**,*herbzet***Re: Inconsistent = all sentences provable?**,*G . Frege***Re: Inconsistent = all sentences provable?**,*george***Re: Inconsistent = all sentences provable?**,*herbzet***Re: Inconsistent = all sentences provable?**,*george***Re: Inconsistent = all sentences provable?**,*herbzet***Re: Inconsistent = all sentences provable?**,*george***Re: Inconsistent = all sentences provable?**,*herbzet***Re: Inconsistent = all sentences provable?**,*Charlie-Boo*

**Re: Inconsistent = all sentences provable?**,*Charlie-Boo*

**Re: Inconsistent = all sentences provable?**,*Charlie-Boo***Re: Inconsistent = all sentences provable?**,*Aatu Koskensilta***Re: Inconsistent = all sentences provable?**,*Charlie-Boo***Re: Inconsistent = all sentences provable?**,*aatu . koskensilta*

**The Set of All Sets Exists**,*victor72***Re: The Set of All Sets Exists**,*G . Frege***Re: The Set of All Sets Exists**,*george***Re: The Set of All Sets Exists**,*G . Frege***Re: The Set of All Sets Exists**,*george***Re: The Set of All Sets Exists**,*G . Frege***Re: The Set of All Sets Exists**,*george***Re: The Set of All Sets Exists**,*G . Frege*

**Re: The Set of All Sets Exists**,*LauLuna***Re: The Set of All Sets Exists**,*victor72***Re: The Set of All Sets Exists**,*george*

**Re: The Set of All Sets Exists**,*george*

**Re: The Set of All Sets Exists**,*george***Re: The Set of All Sets Exists**,*victor72***Re: The Set of All Sets Exists**,*Fuckwit***Re: The Set of All Sets Exists**,*Nam D. Nguyen***Re: The Set of All Sets Exists**,*george***Re: The Set of All Sets Exists**,*george***Re: The Set of All Sets Exists**,*george*

**Re: The Set of All Sets Exists**,*G . Frege*

**Re: The Set of All Sets Exists**,*george***Re: The Set of All Sets Exists**,*george***Re: The Set of All Sets Exists**,*Ross A. Finlayson***Re: The Set of All Sets Exists**,*Ross A. Finlayson*

**Re: Any popular theories discovered to be inconsistent?**,*Ross A. Finlayson***Re: Any popular theories discovered to be inconsistent?**,*Frederick Williams***Re: Any popular theories discovered to be inconsistent?**,*aatu . koskensilta*

**Re: Any popular theories discovered to be inconsistent?**,*Frederick Williams*- <Possible follow-ups>
**Re: Any popular theories discovered to be inconsistent?**,*aatu . koskensilta***Re: Any popular theories discovered to be inconsistent?**,*Arturo Magidin***Re: Any popular theories discovered to be inconsistent?**,*aatu . koskensilta*

**Re: Any popular theories discovered to be inconsistent?**,*jackbatlin***Re: Any popular theories discovered to be inconsistent?**,*aatu . koskensilta*

**Help with the following algorithm about Intervals..!**,*jake***Re: BOING BOING BOING EINBOING STEINBOING**,*John Jones***Re: A creative philosophy of mathematics**,*Peter_Smith*- <Possible follow-ups>
**Re: A creative philosophy of mathematics**,*aatu . koskensilta***Re: A creative philosophy of mathematics**,*galathaea***Re: A creative philosophy of mathematics**,*MoeBlee*

**Which theories hold a true but unprovable statement?**,*jackbatlin***Re: Which theories hold a true but unprovable statement?**,*Frederick Williams***Re: Which theories hold a true but unprovable statement?**,*jackbatlin***Re: Which theories hold a true but unprovable statement?**,*Frederick Williams*

**Re: Which theories hold a true but unprovable statement?**,*Rupert***Re: Which theories hold a true but unprovable statement?**,*george***Re: Which theories hold a true but unprovable statement?**,*Rupert***Re: Which theories hold a true but unprovable statement?**,*george***Re: Which theories hold a true but unprovable statement?**,*herbzet***Re: Which theories hold a true but unprovable statement?**,*Chris Menzel***Re: Which theories hold a true but unprovable statement?**,*george***Re: Which theories hold a true but unprovable statement?**,*Rupert***Re: Which theories hold a true but unprovable statement?**,*Gc***Re: Which theories hold a true but unprovable statement?**,*Rupert***Re: Which theories hold a true but unprovable statement?**,*Gc***Re: Which theories hold a true but unprovable statement?**,*Aatu Koskensilta***Re: Which theories hold a true but unprovable statement?**,*aatu . koskensilta***Re: Which theories hold a true but unprovable statement?**,*Gc***Re: Which theories hold a true but unprovable statement?**,*Gc***Re: Which theories hold a true but unprovable statement?**,*Peter_Smith***Re: Which theories hold a true but unprovable statement?**,*Gc***Re: Which theories hold a true but unprovable statement?**,*Aatu Koskensilta***Re: Which theories hold a true but unprovable statement?**,*Ross A. Finlayson***Re: Which theories hold a true but unprovable statement?**,*Gc***Re: Which theories hold a true but unprovable statement?**,*MoeBlee***Re: Which theories hold a true but unprovable statement?**,*Gc***Re: Which theories hold a true but unprovable statement?**,*Rupert*

**Re: Which theories hold a true but unprovable statement?**,*george***Re: Which theories hold a true but unprovable statement?**,*Charlie-Boo*

**Re: Which theories hold a true but unprovable statement?**,*george***Re: Which theories hold a true but unprovable statement?**,*george***Re: Which theories hold a true but unprovable statement?**,*Charlie-Boo***Re: Which theories hold a true but unprovable statement?**,*george***Re: Which theories hold a true but unprovable statement?**,*aatu . koskensilta*

**Re: Which theories hold a true but unprovable statement?**,*Charlie-Boo*

**"Sentential logic" as a theory or as a "framework" for theories?**,*jackbatlin***Re: "Sentential logic" as a theory or as a "framework" for theories?**,*Frederick Williams***Re: "Sentential logic" as a theory or as a "framework" for theories?**,*Arturo Magidin*

**how to computably enumerate "computable sequences of computably enumerable sets"**,*asdf***Re: Solve for x in eqn1 substitute in for x in eqn2**,*Luke Wu***Completeness and incompleteness**,*jackbatlin***Re: Completeness and incompleteness**,*Lee Rudolph***Re: Completeness and incompleteness**,*Arturo Magidin*

**The Power Set Paradox**,*victor72***Re: The Power Set Paradox**,*Chris Menzel***Re: The Power Set Paradox**,*victor72***Re: The Power Set Paradox**,*G . Frege***Re: The Power Set Paradox**,*victor72***Re: The Power Set Paradox**,*MoeBlee***Re: The Power Set Paradox**,*ken.quirici@xxxxxxxxxx***Re: The Power Set Paradox**,*ken.quirici@xxxxxxxxxx***Re: The Power Set Paradox**,*MoeBlee***Re: The Power Set Paradox**,*ken.quirici@xxxxxxxxxx***Re: The Power Set Paradox**,*MoeBlee***Re: The Power Set Paradox**,*Chris Menzel***Re: The Power Set Paradox**,*aatu . koskensilta***Re: The Power Set Paradox**,*ken.quirici@xxxxxxxxxx***Re: The Power Set Paradox**,*aatu . koskensilta***Re: The Power Set Paradox**,*MoeBlee***Re: The Power Set Paradox**,*Chris Menzel***Re: The Power Set Paradox**,*MoeBlee***Re: The Power Set Paradox**,*Chris Menzel***Re: The Power Set Paradox**,*Chris Menzel***Re: The Power Set Paradox**,*MoeBlee***Re: The Power Set Paradox**,*MoeBlee***Re: The Power Set Paradox**,*Alan Smaill***Re: The Power Set Paradox**,*MoeBlee***Re: The Power Set Paradox**,*MoeBlee***Re: The Power Set Paradox**,*aatu . koskensilta***Re: The Power Set Paradox**,*MoeBlee***Re: The Power Set Paradox**,*MoeBlee***Re: The Power Set Paradox**,*aatu . koskensilta***Re: The Power Set Paradox**,*MoeBlee***Re: The Power Set Paradox**,*aatu . koskensilta***Re: The Power Set Paradox**,*Chris Menzel***Re: The Power Set Paradox**,*aatu . koskensilta***Re: The Power Set Paradox**,*Chris Menzel***Re: The Power Set Paradox**,*victor72***Re: The Power Set Paradox**,*David Marcus***Re: The Power Set Paradox**,*victor72***Re: The Power Set Paradox**,*MoeBlee***Re: The Power Set Paradox**,*MoeBlee***Re: The Power Set Paradox**,*G . Frege***Re: The Power Set Paradox**,*MoeBlee***Re: The Power Set Paradox**,*G . Frege***Re: The Power Set Paradox**,*george***Re: The Power Set Paradox**,*G . Frege*

**Re: The Power Set Paradox**,*Ross A. Finlayson***Re: The Power Set Paradox**,*victor72***Re: The Power Set Paradox**,*Ross A. Finlayson*

**Re: The Power Set Paradox**,*LauLuna*

**how to prove ~(P <--> Q) |- ~P <-->Q**,*translogi***Re: how to prove ~(P <--> Q) |- ~P <-->Q**,*G . Frege***Re: how to prove ~(P <--> Q) |- ~P <-->Q**,*G . Frege*

**Re: how to prove ~(P <--> Q) |- ~P <-->Q**,*Charlie-Boo***Re: how to prove ~(P <--> Q) |- ~P <-->Q**,*Charlie-Boo***Re: how to prove ~(P <--> Q) |- ~P <-->Q**,*G . Frege***Re: how to prove ~(P <--> Q) |- ~P <-->Q**,*R. Srinivasan***Re: how to prove ~(P <--> Q) |- ~P <-->Q**,*G . Frege***Re: how to prove ~(P <--> Q) |- ~P <-->Q**,*R. Srinivasan***Re: how to prove ~(P <--> Q) |- ~P <-->Q**,*G . Frege***Re: how to prove ~(P <--> Q) |- ~P <-->Q**,*G . Frege***Re: how to prove ~(P <--> Q) |- ~P <-->Q**,*translogi***Re: how to prove ~(P <--> Q) |- ~P <-->Q**,*G . Frege***Re: how to prove ~(P <--> Q) |- ~P <-->Q**,*G . Frege***Re: how to prove ~(P <--> Q) |- ~P <-->Q**,*translogi***Re: how to prove ~(P <--> Q) |- ~P <-->Q**,*G . Frege*

**Re: how to prove ~(P <--> Q) |- ~P <-->Q**,*George Dance*

**This sentence is not true**,*Newberry***Re: This sentence is not true**,*David Marcus***Re: This sentence is not true**,*aatu . koskensilta***Re: This sentence is not true**,*David Marcus***Re: This sentence is not true**,*george***Re: This sentence is not true**,*David Marcus***Re: This sentence is not true**,*Newberry***Re: This sentence is not true**,*Daryl McCullough***Re: This sentence is not true**,*David Marcus***Re: This sentence is not true**,*aatu . koskensilta***Re: This sentence is not true**,*David Marcus***Re: This sentence is not true**,*David Marcus***Re: This sentence is not true**,*Newberry***Re: This sentence is not true**,*David Marcus***Re: This sentence is not true**,*Newberry***Re: This sentence is not true**,*David Marcus***Re: This sentence is not true**,*Newberry***Re: This sentence is not true**,*David Marcus***Re: This sentence is not true**,*Newberry***Re: This sentence is not true**,*David Marcus***Re: This sentence is not true**,*galathaea***Re: This sentence is not true**,*aatu . koskensilta***Re: This sentence is not true**,*David Marcus***Re: This sentence is not true**,*David Marcus***Re: This sentence is not true**,*Newberry***Re: This sentence is not true**,*David Marcus***Re: This sentence is not true**,*Newberry***Re: This sentence is not true**,*David Marcus***Re: This sentence is not true**,*Daryl McCullough***Re: This sentence is not true**,*David Marcus***Re: This sentence is not true**,*Daryl McCullough***Re: This sentence is not true**,*David Marcus***Re: This sentence is not true**,*Daryl McCullough***Re: This sentence is not true**,*Newberry***Re: This sentence is not true**,*David Marcus***Re: This sentence is not true**,*Newberry***Re: This sentence is not true**,*Newberry***Re: This sentence is not true**,*David Marcus***Re: This sentence is not true**,*Newberry***Re: This sentence is not true**,*Newberry***Re: This sentence is not true**,*David Marcus***Re: This sentence is not true**,*Newberry***Re: This sentence is not true**,*David Marcus***Re: This sentence is not true**,*Newberry***Re: This sentence is not true**,*David Marcus***Re: This sentence is not true**,*aatu . koskensilta***Re: This sentence is not true**,*David Marcus***Re: This sentence is not true**,*Newberry***Re: This sentence is not true**,*David Marcus***Re: This sentence is not true**,*Newberry***Re: This sentence is not true**,*David Marcus***Re: This sentence is not true**,*Newberry***Re: This sentence is not true**,*Newberry***Re: This sentence is not true**,*John Jones***Re: This sentence is not true**,*aatu . koskensilta***Re: This sentence is not true**,*George Dance***Re: This sentence is not true**,*aatu . koskensilta***Re: This sentence is not true**,*Chris Menzel***Re: This sentence is not true**,*George Dance*

**Re: This sentence is not true**,*LauLuna***Re: This sentence is not true**,*Daryl McCullough***Re: This sentence is not true**,*george***Re: This sentence is not true**,*Daryl McCullough***Re: This sentence is not true**,*LauLuna***Re: This sentence is not true**,*Daryl McCullough***Re: This sentence is not true**,*LauLuna***Re: This sentence is not true**,*Daryl McCullough***Re: This sentence is not true**,*LauLuna***Re: This sentence is not true**,*Daryl McCullough***Re: This sentence is not true**,*Daryl McCullough***Re: This sentence is not true**,*LauLuna***Re: This sentence is not true**,*Daryl McCullough***Re: This sentence is not true**,*Daryl McCullough***Re: This sentence is not true**,*LauLuna***Re: This sentence is not true**,*Daryl McCullough***Re: This sentence is not true**,*LauLuna***Re: This sentence is not true**,*Daryl McCullough***Re: This sentence is not true**,*Newberry*

**Re: This sentence is not true**,*Newberry***Re: This sentence is not true**,*LauLuna*

**Re: This sentence is not true**,*G . Frege***Re: This sentence is not true**,*Chris Menzel***Re: This sentence is not true**,*John Jones***Re: This sentence is not true**,*galathaea***Re: This sentence is not true**,*Newberry*

**Which is 'this' sentence**,*John Jones***Re: Which is 'this' sentence**,*marcia***Re: Which is 'this' sentence**,*William Elliot***Re: Which is 'this' sentence**,*R. Srinivasan***Re: Which is 'this' sentence**,*William Elliot***Re: Which is 'this' sentence**,*John Jones***Re: Which is 'this' sentence**,*William Elliot*

**Re: Which is 'this' sentence**,*R. Srinivasan***Re: Which is 'this' sentence**,*Daryl McCullough***Re: Which is 'this' sentence**,*R. Srinivasan***Re: Which is 'this' sentence**,*Daryl McCullough***Re: Which is 'this' sentence**,*John Jones***Re: Which is 'this' sentence**,*John Jones***Re: Which is 'this' sentence**,*William Elliot***Re: Which is 'this' sentence**,*R. Srinivasan***Re: Which is 'this' sentence**,*William Elliot***Re: Which is 'this' sentence**,*LauLuna***Re: Which is 'this' sentence**,*John Jones***Re: Which is 'this' sentence**,*R. Srinivasan***Re: Which is 'this' sentence**,*John Jones***Re: Which is 'this' sentence**,*R. Srinivasan***Re: Which is 'this' sentence**,*John Jones***Re: Which is 'this' sentence**,*R. Srinivasan***Re: Which is 'this' sentence**,*Daryl McCullough***Re: Which is 'this' sentence**,*R. Srinivasan***Re: Which is 'this' sentence**,*Daryl McCullough***Re: Which is 'this' sentence**,*R. Srinivasan***Re: Which is 'this' sentence**,*David Marcus***Re: Which is 'this' sentence**,*R. Srinivasan***Re: Which is 'this' sentence**,*David Marcus***Re: Which is 'this' sentence**,*R. Srinivasan***Re: Which is 'this' sentence**,*David Marcus***Re: Which is 'this' sentence**,*Daryl McCullough***Re: Which is 'this' sentence**,*R. Srinivasan***Re: Which is 'this' sentence**,*Daryl McCullough***Re: Which is 'this' sentence**,*R. Srinivasan***Re: Which is 'this' sentence**,*John Jones***Re: Which is 'this' sentence**,*John Jones**Message not available**Message not available***Re: Which is 'this' sentence**,*R. Srinivasan*

**Re: This sentence is not true**,*Indoarsman***Re: This sentence is not true**,*Indoarsman***Re: This sentence is not true**,*David Marcus***Re: This sentence is not true**,*Indoarsman***Re: This sentence is not true**,*David Marcus***Re: This sentence is not true**,*Indoarsman***Re: This sentence is not true**,*David Marcus***Re: This sentence is not true**,*Newberry***Re: This sentence is not true**,*Indoarsman***Re: This sentence is not true**,*David Marcus*

**Strange models of propositional logic**,*LauLuna***Re: Strange models of propositional logic**,*LauLuna***Re: Strange models of propositional logic**,*John Jones***Re: Strange models of propositional logic**,*Jan Burse**Message not available***Re: Strange models of propositional logic**,*Jan Burse***Re: Strange models of propositional logic**,*Jan Burse*

*Message not available**Message not available***Re: Strange models of propositional logic**,*Jan Burse***Re: Strange models of propositional logic**,*Jan Burse***Re: Strange models of propositional logic**,*Jan Burse***Re: Strange models of propositional logic**,*LauLuna*

**Re: Strange models of propositional logic**,*Jan Burse***Re: Strange models of propositional logic**,*John Jones***Re: Strange models of propositional logic**,*Jan Burse*

**Re: DOUBLE ALBERT BURGER WITH FRIES POPULAR IN EINSTEIN TAKEAWAY**,*John Jones***sci.logic Comments**,*Ross A. Finlayson***Re: sci.logic Comments**,*aatu . koskensilta***Re: sci.logic Comments**,*Ross A. Finlayson***Re: sci.logic Comments**,*aatu . koskensilta***Re: sci.logic Comments**,*Ross A. Finlayson***Re: sci.logic Comments**,*aatu . koskensilta***Re: sci.logic Comments**,*Ross A. Finlayson*

**attn: curcio - extremely super mp3 music - dem - (1/1)**,*panchito***Re: Is {{}} a valid construct?**,*Charlie-Boo*- <Possible follow-ups>
**Re: Is {{}} a valid construct?**,*Charlie-Boo***Re: Is {{}} a valid construct?**,*Charlie-Boo***Re: Is {{}} a valid construct?**,*Neo*

**Re: From Pythagoras to programming**,*John Jones***Set puzzle explained**,*John Jones***Re: Set puzzle explained**,*Jan Burse***Re: Set puzzle explained**,*John Jones***Re: Set puzzle explained**,*David Marcus***Re: Set puzzle explained**,*John Jones*

**Re: Uncomputable numbers are all in your head**,*Scott***Re: Uncomputable numbers are all in your head**,*MoeBlee*- <Possible follow-ups>
**Re: Uncomputable numbers are all in your head**,*Scott***Re: Uncomputable numbers are all in your head**,*MoeBlee***Re: Uncomputable numbers are all in your head**,*David Marcus*

**Re: Request for clarification of what is a non first-order definable set.**,*Scott***Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?**,*Charlie-Boo*- <Possible follow-ups>
**Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?**,*Charlie-Boo***Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?**,*David Marcus***Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?**,*Charlie-Boo***Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?**,*Fuckwit***Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?**,*Charlie-Boo***Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?**,*Fuckwit***Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?**,*Charlie-Boo***Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?**,*Charlie-Boo***Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?**,*Fuckwit***Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?**,*Charlie-Boo***Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?**,*Charlie-Boo***Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?**,*Charlie-Boo***Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?**,*Fuckwit***Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?**,*Charlie-Boo***Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?**,*Charlie-Boo***Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?**,*Fuckwit***Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?**,*Charlie-Boo***Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?**,*Alan Smaill***Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?**,*Charlie-Boo***Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?**,*Alan Smaill***Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?**,*Charlie-Boo***Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?**,*Alan Smaill***Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?**,*Charlie-Boo***Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?**,*Alan Smaill***Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?**,*Bill Hale***Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?**,*Charlie-Boo***Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?**,*herbzet***Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?**,*Charlie-Boo***Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?**,*herbzet***Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?**,*Charlie-Boo*

**Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?**,*Bill Hale***Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?**,*Charlie-Boo***Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?**,*David C . Ullrich***Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?**,*Charlie-Boo***Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?**,*Bill Hale*

**Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?**,*David C . Ullrich***Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?**,*Charlie-Boo***Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?**,*David C . Ullrich***Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?**,*G . Frege***Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?**,*Charlie-Boo***Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?**,*G . Frege***Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?**,*Charlie-Boo***Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?**,*G . Frege***Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?**,*G . Frege***Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?**,*G . Frege***Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?**,*Charlie-Boo***Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?**,*Charlie-Boo***Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?**,*G . Frege***Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?**,*Charlie-Boo***Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?**,*Charlie-Boo***Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?**,*G . Frege***Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?**,*G . Frege***Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?**,*G . Frege***Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?**,*G . Frege***Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?**,*herbzet***Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?**,*G . Frege***Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?**,*herbzet***Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?**,*G . Frege***Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?**,*herbzet***Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?**,*G . Frege***Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?**,*G . Frege***Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?**,*G . Frege***Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?**,*herbzet***Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?**,*G . Frege***Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?**,*herbzet***Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?**,*G . Frege***Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?**,*herbzet***Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?**,*G . Frege***Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?**,*herbzet***Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?**,*G . Frege***Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?**,*herbzet***Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?**,*G . Frege***Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?**,*G . Frege***Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?**,*G . Frege***Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?**,*herbzet***Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?**,*G . Frege***Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?**,*herbzet***Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?**,*G . Frege***Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?**,*G . Frege***Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?**,*G . Frege***Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?**,*G . Frege***Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?**,*aatu . koskensilta***Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?**,*G . Frege***Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?**,*G . Frege***Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?**,*Charlie-Boo***Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?**,*G . Frege***Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?**,*G . Frege***Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?**,*herbzet***Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?**,*G . Frege***Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?**,*G . Frege***Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?**,*G . Frege***Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?**,*G . Frege***Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?**,*herbzet***Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?**,*G . Frege***Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?**,*G . Frege***Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?**,*herbzet***Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?**,*G . Frege***Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?**,*G . Frege***Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?**,*herbzet***Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?**,*G . Frege***Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?**,*G . Frege***Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?**,*G . Frege***Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?**,*G . Frege***Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?**,*herbzet***Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?**,*G . Frege***Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?**,*G . Frege***Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?**,*herbzet***Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?**,*G . Frege***Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?**,*G . Frege***Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?**,*herbzet***Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?**,*G . Frege***Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?**,*G . Frege***Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?**,*G . Frege***Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?**,*Norman Megill***Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?**,*Stephen Harris***Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?**,*Charlie-Boo***Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?**,*David C . Ullrich**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available***Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?**,*G . Frege***Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?**,*G . Frege***Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?**,*David Marcus**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available***Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?**,*Norman Megill***Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?**,*Charlie-Boo***Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?**,*Norman Megill***Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?**,*G . Frege***Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?**,*G . Frege**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available***Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?**,*MoeBlee***Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?**,*Charlie-Boo***Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?**,*herbzet***Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?**,*Charlie-Boo***Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?**,*herbzet***Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?**,*Charlie-Boo***Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?**,*Charlie-Boo***Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?**,*herbzet***Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?**,*Charlie-Boo***Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?**,*David C . Ullrich***Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?**,*Charlie-Boo***Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?**,*G . Frege***Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?**,*Charlie-Boo***Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?**,*David Marcus***Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?**,*Charlie-Boo***Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?**,*David Marcus***Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?**,*Charlie-Boo***Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?**,*David Marcus***Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?**,*Charlie-Boo***Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?**,*David Marcus***Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?**,*G . Frege***Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?**,*Daryl McCullough***Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?**,*Charlie-Boo***Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?**,*Charlie-Boo***Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?**,*Daryl McCullough***Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?**,*Charlie-Boo***Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?**,*G . Frege***Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?**,*Bill Hale***Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?**,*Norman Megill***Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?**,*Charlie-Boo***Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?**,*Bill Hale***Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?**,*Alan Smaill***Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?**,*Charlie-Boo***Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?**,*David Marcus***Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?**,*Charlie-Boo***Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?**,*David Marcus***Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?**,*Alan Smaill***Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?**,*MoeBlee***Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?**,*Alan Smaill***Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?**,*G . Frege***Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?**,*Charlie-Boo***Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?**,*Bill Hale***Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?**,*Charlie-Boo***Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?**,*Bill Hale***Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?**,*Charlie-Boo***Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?**,*MoeBlee***Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?**,*Bill Hale***Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?**,*G . Frege***Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?**,*G . Frege***Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?**,*G . Frege***Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?**,*G . Frege***Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?**,*Charlie-Boo***Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?**,*MoeBlee***Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?**,*David C . Ullrich*

**Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?**,*Charlie-Boo***Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?**,*Bill Hale***Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?**,*Charlie-Boo***Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?**,*Bill Hale***Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?**,*Charlie-Boo***Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?**,*Bill Hale***Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?**,*Charlie-Boo***Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?**,*Bill Hale***Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?**,*Charlie-Boo***Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?**,*Bill Hale***Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?**,*Charlie-Boo***Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?**,*Bill Hale***Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?**,*Charlie-Boo***Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?**,*Bill Hale***Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?**,*Charlie-Boo***Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?**,*Bill Hale***Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?**,*Charlie-Boo***Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?**,*Bill Hale*

**Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?**,*Charlie-Boo***Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?**,*Charlie-Boo***Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?**,*Charlie-Boo***Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?**,*Charlie-Boo***Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?**,*Charlie-Boo***Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?**,*Norman Megill***Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?**,*G . Frege***Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?**,*G . Frege***Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?**,*Charlie-Boo*

**Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?**,*David Marcus***Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?**,*Charlie-Boo***Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?**,*Norman Megill*

**Re: Five things ***s believe**,*Charlie-Boo***Set Puzzle**,*John Jones***Re: Set Puzzle**,*Charlie-Boo*

**Re: Physics comments from math/logic types?**,*John Jones**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available***Re: Physics comments from math/logic types?**,*LauLuna*

**Mathematical induction in automated theorem prover**,*Lash Rambo***Re: Mathematical induction in automated theorem prover**,*William Elliot***Re: Mathematical induction in automated theorem prover**,*Lash Rambo***Re: Mathematical induction in automated theorem prover**,*William Elliot***Re: Mathematical induction in automated theorem prover**,*Lash Rambo***Re: Mathematical induction in automated theorem prover**,*William Elliot*

**Re: Mathematical induction in automated theorem prover**,*David C . Ullrich***Re: Mathematical induction in automated theorem prover**,*Lash Rambo***Re: Mathematical induction in automated theorem prover**,*David C . Ullrich***Re: Mathematical induction in automated theorem prover**,*Lash Rambo***Re: Mathematical induction in automated theorem prover**,*William Elliot***Re: Mathematical induction in automated theorem prover**,*Lash Rambo***Re: Mathematical induction in automated theorem prover**,*William Elliot***Re: Mathematical induction in automated theorem prover**,*David C . Ullrich***Re: Mathematical induction in automated theorem prover**,*Lash Rambo***Re: Mathematical induction in automated theorem prover**,*William Elliot***Re: Mathematical induction in automated theorem prover**,*Lash Rambo*

**Re: Mathematical induction in automated theorem prover**,*Charlie-Boo***Re: Mathematical induction in automated theorem prover**,*Dan Christensen*

**Re: Mathematical induction in automated theorem prover**,*Jan Burse***Re: Mathematical induction in automated theorem prover**,*Jan Burse*

**Re: Wasabiburn unites with internets**,*AndyMC***Re: Does This Ever Happen to Anyone Else?**,*Charlie-Boo*- <Possible follow-ups>
**Re: Does This Ever Happen to Anyone Else?**,*Charlie-Boo***Re: Does This Ever Happen to Anyone Else?**,*minsky@xxxxxxxxxxxxx***Re: Does This Ever Happen to Anyone Else?**,*Alan Smaill***Re: Does This Ever Happen to Anyone Else?**,*Charlie-Boo***Re: Does This Ever Happen to Anyone Else?**,*Alan Smaill***Re: Does This Ever Happen to Anyone Else?**,*Charlie-Boo***Re: Does This Ever Happen to Anyone Else?**,*Alan Smaill***Re: Does This Ever Happen to Anyone Else?**,*Charlie-Boo***Re: Does This Ever Happen to Anyone Else?**,*Alan Smaill***Re: Does This Ever Happen to Anyone Else?**,*Charlie-Boo***Re: Does This Ever Happen to Anyone Else?**,*Alan Smaill***Re: Does This Ever Happen to Anyone Else?**,*H. J. Sander Bruggink***Re: Does This Ever Happen to Anyone Else?**,*Charlie-Boo***Re: Does This Ever Happen to Anyone Else?**,*H. J. Sander Bruggink*

**Re: Does This Ever Happen to Anyone Else?**,*Charlie-Boo***Re: Does This Ever Happen to Anyone Else?**,*Charlie-Boo***Re: Does This Ever Happen to Anyone Else?**,*David C . Ullrich***Re: Does This Ever Happen to Anyone Else?**,*Charlie-Boo*

**Re: Does This Ever Happen to Anyone Else?**,*Charlie-Boo***Re: Does This Ever Happen to Anyone Else?**,*Chris Menzel***Re: Does This Ever Happen to Anyone Else?**,*Chris Menzel***Re: Does This Ever Happen to Anyone Else?**,*Charlie-Boo***Re: Does This Ever Happen to Anyone Else?**,*Chris Menzel***Re: Does This Ever Happen to Anyone Else?**,*Charlie-Boo***Re: Does This Ever Happen to Anyone Else?**,*Fuckwit***Re: Does This Ever Happen to Anyone Else?**,*Charlie-Boo***Re: Does This Ever Happen to Anyone Else?**,*Alan Smaill***Re: Does This Ever Happen to Anyone Else?**,*Charlie-Boo***Re: Does This Ever Happen to Anyone Else?**,*Alan Smaill***Re: Does This Ever Happen to Anyone Else?**,*Charlie-Boo***Re: Does This Ever Happen to Anyone Else?**,*Charlie-Boo***Re: Does This Ever Happen to Anyone Else?**,*Fuckwit***Re: Does This Ever Happen to Anyone Else?**,*Charlie-Boo***Re: Does This Ever Happen to Anyone Else?**,*Fuckwit***Re: Does This Ever Happen to Anyone Else?**,*Fuckwit***Re: Does This Ever Happen to Anyone Else?**,*Charlie-Boo***Re: Does This Ever Happen to Anyone Else?**,*Fuckwit***Re: Does This Ever Happen to Anyone Else?**,*Charlie-Boo***Re: Does This Ever Happen to Anyone Else?**,*David C . Ullrich***Re: Does This Ever Happen to Anyone Else?**,*Charlie-Boo***Re: Does This Ever Happen to Anyone Else?**,*Charlie-Boo***Re: Does This Ever Happen to Anyone Else?**,*Lee Rudolph***Re: Does This Ever Happen to Anyone Else?**,*Charlie-Boo*

**Re: Does This Ever Happen to Anyone Else?**,*Charlie-Boo***Re: Does This Ever Happen to Anyone Else?**,*Charlie-Boo***Re: Does This Ever Happen to Anyone Else?**,*Charlie-Boo*

**Re: Halting problem totally unsolvable?**,*Charlie-Boo*- <Possible follow-ups>
**Re: Halting problem totally unsolvable?**,*Charlie-Boo*

**Re: Goedel's proof**,*Charlie-Boo***Re: Goedel's proof**,*Chris Menzel***Re: Goedel's proof**,*Charlie-Boo***Re: Goedel's proof**,*Chris Menzel***Re: Goedel's proof**,*Charlie-Boo***Re: Goedel's proof**,*Peter_Smith***Re: Goedel's proof**,*Charlie-Boo***Re: Goedel's proof**,*Peter_Smith***Re: Goedel's proof**,*Charlie-Boo***Re: Goedel's proof**,*Charlie-Boo***Re: Goedel's proof**,*Nam Nguyen***Re: Goedel's proof**,*Charlie-Boo***Re: Goedel's proof**,*Peter_Smith***Re: Goedel's proof**,*Charlie-Boo***Re: Goedel's proof**,*Newberry***Re: Goedel's proof**,*george*

- <Possible follow-ups>
**Re: Goedel's proof**,*Charlie-Boo***Re: Goedel's proof**,*Charlie-Boo***Re: Goedel's proof**,*R. Srinivasan***Re: Goedel's proof**,*Charlie-Boo*

**Re: Goedel's proof**,*LauLuna***Re: Goedel's proof**,*Peter_Smith***Re: Goedel's proof**,*Charlie-Boo***Re: Goedel's proof**,*Peter_Smith***Re: Goedel's proof**,*Charlie-Boo***Re: Goedel's proof**,*Peter_Smith***Re: Goedel's proof**,*Charlie-Boo***Re: Goedel's proof**,*Peter_Smith***Re: Goedel's proof**,*Charlie-Boo***Re: Goedel's proof**,*Peter_Smith*

**Re: Goedel's proof**,*george***Re: Goedel's proof**,*Newberry*

**Re: Goedel's proof**,*george***Re: Goedel's proof**,*Peter_Smith***Re: Goedel's proof**,*Nam D. Nguyen***Re: Goedel's proof**,*george*

**Set of certainties**,*John Jones***Re: Set of certainties**,*Nam D. Nguyen***Re: Set of certainties**,*John Jones*

**Re: CROSSPOSTING TO LOGIC SITE BY ATHEIST *****,*John Jones***Wear and tear**,*John Jones***Re: Constructive math query:- Countable orders**,*LauLuna*- <Possible follow-ups>
**Re: Constructive math query:- Countable orders**,*Keith Ramsay***Re: Constructive math query:- Countable orders**,*Keith Ramsay*

**Global Warming and the White House Conspiracy**,*carter . sterling***Re: Global Warming and the White House Conspiracy**,*William Elliot*

**Re: "The mathematical universe is strongly typed"**,*abo***Ve?**,*Mad_man_on_a_MissIon***Re: Is Validity Just a Hypothetical or Conditional Characteristic?**,*Jan Burse***[FAQ, 06/11/05] Mathematical logic on the web**,*Boris 'pi' Piwinger***Re: Inconceivable**,*Stephen Harris***Re: Proof**,*John Jones***Re: Reflections on Free Will and Proposed Perfect Knowledge of God**,*Daryl McCullough***Re: Reflections on Free Will and Proposed Perfect Knowledge of God**,*Stephen Harris***Re: Reflections on Free Will and Proposed Perfect Knowledge of God**,*Daryl McCullough*

- <Possible follow-ups>
**Re: Reflections on Free Will and Proposed Perfect Knowledge of God**,*Stephen Harris***Re: Reflections on Free Will and Proposed Perfect Knowledge of God**,*Stephen Harris***Re: Reflections on Free Will and Proposed Perfect Knowledge of God**,*Stephen Harris***Re: Reflections on Free Will and Proposed Perfect Knowledge of God**,*Stephen Harris***Re: Reflections on Free Will and Proposed Perfect Knowledge of God**,*Daryl McCullough*

**Re: Reflections on Free Will and Proposed Perfect Knowledge of God**,*guenther vonKnakspot***Re: Reflections on Free Will and Proposed Perfect Knowledge of God**,*LauLuna***Re: Reflections on Free Will and Proposed Perfect Knowledge of God**,*R. Srinivasan***Re: Reflections on Free Will and Proposed Perfect Knowledge of God**,*aktivator99***Re: Reflections on Free Will and Proposed Perfect Knowledge of God**,*David*

**representation of monotone boolean functions**,*sasha mal*