sci.logic
- Re: Is wittgensteins colour exclusion problem formalizable?
- From: J P
- Re: Is wittgensteins colour exclusion problem formalizable?
- From: translogi
- hi
- From: ahire . vaibhav
- Re: infinitely many nn's = infinite nn's?
- From: Phil
- What could be reasoned from one proposition "A is B"?
- From: Conbra
- Re: Axiomatic set theory is still contradictory
- From: johnny.tooloose
- Re: Axiomatic set theory is still contradictory
- From: johnny.tooloose
- Re: Is wittgensteins colour exclusion problem formalizable?
- From: J P
- Re: Axiomatic set theory is still contradictory
- From: Charlie-Boo
- Re: OUTGOEDELING A HUMAN?
- From: Daryl McCullough
- Re: OUTGOEDELING A HUMAN?
- From: aatu . koskensilta
- Re: OUTGOEDELING A HUMAN?
- From: aatu . koskensilta
- Re: OUTGOEDELING A HUMAN?
- From: LauLuna
- Re: OUTGOEDELING A HUMAN?
- From: LauLuna
- Re: The set of all JOKES.....
- From: LauLuna
- Re: The set of all JOKES.....
- From: LauLuna
- Re: The set of all JOKES.....
- From: LauLuna
- Re: Which theories hold a true but unprovable statement?
- From: aatu . koskensilta
- Re: OUTGOEDELING A HUMAN?
- From: aatu . koskensilta
- Re: OUTGOEDELING A HUMAN?
- From: aatu . koskensilta
- Re: OUTGOEDELING A HUMAN?
- From: aatu . koskensilta
- Re: Inconsistent = all sentences provable?
- From: aatu . koskensilta
- Re: Inconsistent = all sentences provable?
- From: aatu . koskensilta
- Re: Inconsistent = all sentences provable?
- From: aatu . koskensilta
- Re: OUTGOEDELING A HUMAN?
- From: Nam D. Nguyen
- Re: Inconsistent = all sentences provable?
- From: Charlie-Boo
- Re: Inconsistent = all sentences provable?
- From: Charlie-Boo
- Re: Inconsistent = all sentences provable?
- From: Charlie-Boo
- Re: OUTGOEDELING A HUMAN?
- From: herbzet
- Re: The set of all JOKES.....
- From: John Jones
- Re: The set of all JOKES.....
- From: charleswehner@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: OUTGOEDELING A HUMAN?
- From: John Jones
- Re: The set of all JOKES.....
- From: John Jones
- Re: The set of all JOKES.....
- From: charleswehner@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: The set of all JOKES.....
- From: charleswehner@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: OUTGOEDELING A HUMAN?
- From: Daryl McCullough
- Re: OUTGOEDELING A HUMAN?
- From: Daryl McCullough
- Re: OUTGOEDELING A HUMAN?
- From: Daryl McCullough
- Re: OUTGOEDELING A HUMAN?
- From: Daryl McCullough
- Re: OUTGOEDELING A HUMAN?
- From: LauLuna
- Re: OUTGOEDELING A HUMAN?
- From: LauLuna
- Re: OUTGOEDELING A HUMAN?
- From: LauLuna
- Re: The set of all JOKES.....
- From: LauLuna
- Re: Is wittgensteins colour exclusion problem formalizable?
- From: translogi
- Re: OUTGOEDELING A HUMAN?
- From: LauLuna
- Re: OUTGOEDELING A HUMAN?
- From: LauLuna
- Re: OUTGOEDELING A HUMAN?
- From: LauLuna
- Re: OUTGOEDELING A HUMAN?
- From: Nam D. Nguyen
- Elementary equivalence and elementary substructures
- From: mordov
- Re: wittgensteins Tractarian logic any suggestions.?
- From: G . Frege
- Re: OUTGOEDELING A HUMAN?
- From: abo
- Re: wittgensteins Tractarian logic any suggestions.?
- From: G . Frege
- Re: OUTGOEDELING A HUMAN?
- From: herbzet
- Re: wittgensteins Tractarian logic any suggestions.?
- From: G . Frege
- Re: wittgensteins Tractarian logic any suggestions.?
- From: G . Frege
- Re: OUTGOEDELING A HUMAN?
- From: Daryl McCullough
- Re: The set of all JOKES.....
- From: John Jones
- Re: Is wittgensteins colour exclusion problem formalizable?
- From: John Jones
- Re: A theory
- From: Charlie-Boo
- Re: Is wittgensteins colour exclusion problem formalizable?
- From: translogi
- Re: OUTGOEDELING A HUMAN?
- From: Daryl McCullough
- Re: OUTGOEDELING A HUMAN?
- From: abo
- Re: OUTGOEDELING A HUMAN?
- From: Daryl McCullough
- Re: OUTGOEDELING A HUMAN?
- From: Daryl McCullough
- Re: OUTGOEDELING A HUMAN?
- From: Daryl McCullough
- Re: OUTGOEDELING A HUMAN?
- From: LauLuna
- Re: OUTGOEDELING A HUMAN?
- From: Daryl McCullough
- Re: OUTGOEDELING A HUMAN?
- From: LauLuna
- Re: OUTGOEDELING A HUMAN?
- From: abo
- Re: OUTGOEDELING A HUMAN?
- From: Daryl McCullough
- Re: OUTGOEDELING A HUMAN?
- From: Daryl McCullough
- Re: OUTGOEDELING A HUMAN?
- From: Daryl McCullough
- Re: OUTGOEDELING A HUMAN?
- From: LauLuna
- Re: Is wittgensteins colour exclusion problem formalizable?
- From: John Jones
- Re: wittgensteins Tractarian logic any suggestions.?
- From: translogi
- Re: wittgensteins Tractarian logic any suggestions.?
- From: John Jones
- Re: OUTGOEDELING A HUMAN?
- From: Charlie-Boo
- Re: OUTGOEDELING A HUMAN?
- From: Charlie-Boo
- Re: OUTGOEDELING A HUMAN?
- From: abo
- Re: OUTGOEDELING A HUMAN?
- From: Nam D. Nguyen
- Re: OUTGOEDELING A HUMAN?
- From: abo
- Re: OUTGOEDELING A HUMAN?
- From: Daryl McCullough
- Re: OUTGOEDELING A HUMAN?
- From: Nam D. Nguyen
- Re: OUTGOEDELING A HUMAN?
- From: Daryl McCullough
- Re: OUTGOEDELING A HUMAN?
- From: Nam D. Nguyen
- Re: OUTGOEDELING A HUMAN?
- From: Daryl McCullough
- Re: OUTGOEDELING A HUMAN?
- From: Nam D. Nguyen
- Re: OUTGOEDELING A HUMAN?
- From: Daryl McCullough
- Re: wittgensteins Tractarian logic any suggestions.?
- From: G . Frege
- Re: wittgensteins Tractarian logic any suggestions.?
- From: Jan Burse
- Re: wittgensteins Tractarian logic any suggestions.?
- From: G . Frege
- Re: A creative philosophy of mathematics
- From: MoeBlee
- Re: OUTGOEDELING A HUMAN?
- From: abo
- Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?
- From: G . Frege
- Re: OUTGOEDELING A HUMAN?
- From: Daryl McCullough
- Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?
- From: herbzet
- Re: The set of all JOKES.....
- From: charleswehner@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: OUTGOEDELING A HUMAN?
- From: David Marcus
- Re: Is wittgensteins colour exclusion problem formalizable?
- From: translogi
- Re: OUTGOEDELING A HUMAN?
- From: Daryl McCullough
- Re: OUTGOEDELING A HUMAN?
- From: LauLuna
- Call for Papers with Extended Deadline: WORLDCOMP'07 (June 25-28, 2007, Las Vegas, USA): conferences in computer science, computer engineering, and applied computing
- From: A. M. G. Solo
- Re: OUTGOEDELING A HUMAN?
- From: abo
- Re: OUTGOEDELING A HUMAN?
- From: Nam D. Nguyen
- Re: THE SUBTLE FRAUD OF RELATIVITY
- From: Ross A. Finlayson
- A theory
- From: Ross A. Finlayson
- Re: OUTGOEDELING A HUMAN?
- From: Daryl McCullough
- Re: OUTGOEDELING A HUMAN?
- From: abo
- Re: OUTGOEDELING A HUMAN?
- From: Daryl McCullough
- Re: The set of all JOKES.....
- From: John Jones
- Re: wittgensteins Tractarian logic any suggestions.?
- From: John Jones
- Re: Is wittgensteins colour exclusion problem formalizable?
- From: John Jones
- Re: OUTGOEDELING A HUMAN?
- From: abo
- The set of all JOKES.....
- From: charleswehner@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: wittgensteins Tractarian logic any suggestions.?
- From: G . Frege
- Re: OUTGOEDELING A HUMAN?
- From: Daryl McCullough
- wittgensteins Tractarian logic any suggestions.?
- From: translogi
- Re: Is wittgensteins colour exclusion problem formalizable?
- From: translogi
- Re: OUTGOEDELING A HUMAN?
- From: David Marcus
- Re: OUTGOEDELING A HUMAN?
- From: LauLuna
- Re: This sentence is not true
- From: David Marcus
- Re: OUTGOEDELING A HUMAN?
- From: Daryl McCullough
- Re: This sentence is not true
- From: Indoarsman
- Re: OUTGOEDELING A HUMAN?
- From: abo
- Re: OUTGOEDELING A HUMAN?
- From: Daryl McCullough
- Re: OUTGOEDELING A HUMAN?
- From: Aatu Koskensilta
- Re: OUTGOEDELING A HUMAN?
- From: Daryl McCullough
- Re: Canonical form with NOR or NAND?
- From: Jack W.
- Re: OUTGOEDELING A HUMAN?
- From: Aatu Koskensilta
- Re: Stuck on a logic problem
- From: Peter_Smith
- Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?
- From: G . Frege
- Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?
- From: G . Frege
- "A Glitch in The Matrix Exists"
- From: newstips6706
- Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?
- From: herbzet
- Re: Which theories hold a true but unprovable statement?
- From: Gc
- Re: Which theories hold a true but unprovable statement?
- From: Gc
- Re: Which theories hold a true but unprovable statement?
- From: george
- Re: Is wittgensteins colour exclusion problem formalizable?
- From: John Jones
- Re: OUTGOEDELING A HUMAN?
- From: John Jones
- Stuck on a logic problem
- From: Snis Pilbor
- Re: Which theories hold a true but unprovable statement?
- From: MoeBlee
- Re: OUTGOEDELING A HUMAN?
- From: Daryl McCullough
- Re: OUTGOEDELING A HUMAN?
- From: george
- Re: Is wittgensteins colour exclusion problem formalizable?
- From: translogi
- Re: OUTGOEDELING A HUMAN?
- From: Daryl McCullough
- Re: OUTGOEDELING A HUMAN?
- From: Daryl McCullough
- CSL07 (11-15 September, 2007, Lausanne): Call for papers
- From: alessandro . facchini
- Re: OUTGOEDELING A HUMAN?
- From: LauLuna
- OUTGOEDELING A HUMAN?
- From: LauLuna
- Re: Is wittgensteins colour exclusion problem formalizable?
- From: John Jones
- Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?
- From: G . Frege
- Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?
- From: G . Frege
- Re: This sentence is not true
- From: David Marcus
- Re: This sentence is not true
- From: David Marcus
- Re: Is wittgensteins colour exclusion problem formalizable?
- From: translogi
- Re: This sentence is not true
- From: Indoarsman
- Re: This sentence is not true
- From: Indoarsman
- Re: The Day I Met the Liar
- From: John Jones
- Re: Which theories hold a true but unprovable statement?
- From: Ross A. Finlayson
- Re: Which theories hold a true but unprovable statement?
- From: Aatu Koskensilta
- Re: Is wittgensteins colour exclusion problem formalizable?
- From: John Jones
- Re: Inconsistent = all sentences provable?
- From: Aatu Koskensilta
- Re: Is wittgensteins colour exclusion problem formalizable?
- From: translogi
- Re: Which theories hold a true but unprovable statement?
- From: Charlie-Boo
- Re: Which theories hold a true but unprovable statement?
- From: Charlie-Boo
- Re: Which theories hold a true but unprovable statement?
- From: Charlie-Boo
- Re: Is Truth Mysterious?
- From: herbzet
- The Day I Met the Liar
- From: Indoarsman
- Re: Which theories hold a true but unprovable statement?
- From: Peter_Smith
- Re: Causality in sample space
- From: Mike
- Re: Causality in sample space
- From: John Jones
- Re: Which theories hold a true but unprovable statement?
- From: Gc
- Re: Which theories hold a true but unprovable statement?
- From: Gc
- Re: Which theories hold a true but unprovable statement?
- From: aatu . koskensilta
- Re: This sentence is not true
- From: Newberry
- Re: Is Truth Mysterious?
- From: David Marcus
- Re: Is Truth Mysterious?
- From: LauLuna
- Causality in sample space
- From: Mike
- Re: Which theories hold a true but unprovable statement?
- From: Gc
- Re: Which theories hold a true but unprovable statement?
- From: Aatu Koskensilta
- Fractional cardinality?
- From: Frederick Williams
- Re: Which theories hold a true but unprovable statement?
- From: Gc
- Re: Which theories hold a true but unprovable statement?
- From: Aatu Koskensilta
- Re: Inconsistent = all sentences provable?
- From: Aatu Koskensilta
- Re: Inconsistent = all sentences provable?
- From: Aatu Koskensilta
- Re: This sentence is not true
- From: David Marcus
- Re: Which theories hold a true but unprovable statement?
- From: Rupert
- Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?
- From: G . Frege
- Re: This sentence is not true
- From: Indoarsman
- Re: Inconsistent = all sentences provable?
- From: Charlie-Boo
- Re: Inconsistent = all sentences provable?
- From: Charlie-Boo
- Re: Is Truth Mysterious?
- From: David Marcus
- Re: Inconsistent = all sentences provable?
- From: Charlie-Boo
- Re: Inconsistent = all sentences provable?
- From: Charlie-Boo
- Re: Inconsistent = all sentences provable?
- From: herbzet
- Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?
- From: herbzet
- Re: Is Truth Mysterious?
- From: herbzet
- Re: Which theories hold a true but unprovable statement?
- From: Gc
- Re: Which theories hold a true but unprovable statement?
- From: Rupert
- Re: Which theories hold a true but unprovable statement?
- From: Rupert
- Re: Which theories hold a true but unprovable statement?
- From: Rupert
- Re: Is Truth Mysterious?
- From: David Marcus
- Re: E=mc2 and British Nobel Laureate Frederick Soddi
- From: Frederick Williams
- Re: Is Truth Mysterious?
- From: Daryl McCullough
- Re: Recursive within enumerable?
- From: Frederick Williams
- Re: Is Truth Mysterious?
- From: LauLuna
- Re: Is Truth Mysterious?
- From: LauLuna
- Re: Is Truth Mysterious?
- From: LauLuna
- Re: Recursive within enumerable?
- From: Bill Taylor
- Re: Question about hypothetical syllogism
- From: Newberry
- Re: This sentence is not true
- From: Indoarsman
- Re: Recursive within enumerable?
- From: Peter_Smith
- Re: Is Truth Mysterious?
- From: David Marcus
- Re: Is wittgensteins colour exclusion problem formalizable?
- From: John Jones
- Re: Is wittgensteins colour exclusion problem formalizable?
- From: Aatu Koskensilta
- Is wittgensteins colour exclusion problem formalizable?
- From: translogi
- Re: Axiomatic set theory is still contradictory
- From: MoeBlee
- Re: Axiomatic set theory is still contradictory
- From: MoeBlee
- Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?
- From: G . Frege
- Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?
- From: G . Frege
- Re: Recursive within enumerable?
- From: Daryl McCullough
- Re: The Power Set Reduced
- From: Aatu Koskensilta
- Re: The Power Set Reduced
- From: Aatu Koskensilta
- Re: Axiomatic set theory is still contradictory
- From: David C . Ullrich
- Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?
- From: G . Frege
- Re: Inconsistent = all sentences provable?
- From: george
- Re: Recursive within enumerable?
- From: Chris Menzel
- Recursive within enumerable?
- From: Bill Taylor
- Re: Axiomatic set theory is still contradictory
- From: george
- Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?
- From: G . Frege
- Re: Axiomatic set theory is still contradictory
- From: george
- Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?
- From: G . Frege
- Re: Book with this proof system for propositional logic
- From: G . Frege
- Re: Is Truth Mysterious?
- From: David Marcus
- Re: Is Truth Mysterious?
- From: herbzet
- Re: Is Truth Mysterious?
- From: herbzet
- Re: Is Truth Mysterious?
- From: herbzet
- Re: Axiomatic set theory is still contradictory
- From: ken.quirici@xxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Question about hypothetical syllogism
- From: G . Frege
- Re: Question about hypothetical syllogism
- From: G . Frege
- Re: Question about hypothetical syllogism
- From: G . Frege
- Re: Axiomatic set theory is still contradictory
- From: MoeBlee
- Re: Book with this proof system for propositional logic
- From: G . Frege
- Re: Question about hypothetical syllogism
- From: G . Frege
- Re: Axiomatic set theory is still contradictory
- From: victor72
- Re: Axiomatic set theory is still contradictory
- From: MoeBlee
- Re: Question about hypothetical syllogism
- From: G . Frege
- Re: Question about hypothetical syllogism
- From: Jan Burse
- HealthCare Lab Professionals
- From: lab
- Lab Professionals
- From: lab
- Re: Axiomatic set theory is still contradictory
- From: Fuckwit
- Re: Question about hypothetical syllogism
- From: G . Frege
- Re: Axiomatic set theory is still contradictory
- From: David C . Ullrich
- Re: Book with this proof system for propositional logic
- From: G Patel
- Re: Axiomatic set theory is still contradictory
- From: victor72
- Re: Question about hypothetical syllogism
- From: Jan Burse
- Re: Axiomatic set theory is still contradictory
- From: Nam D. Nguyen
- Axiomatic set theory is still contradictory
- From: victor72
- Re: Is Truth Mysterious?
- From: David Marcus
- Re: Question about hypothetical syllogism
- From: Newberry
- Re: The Power Set Reduced
- From: David Marcus
- Re: The Power Set Reduced
- From: MoeBlee
- Re: Inconsistent = all sentences provable?
- From: herbzet
- Re: Is Truth Mysterious?
- From: G . Frege
- Re: Is Truth Mysterious?
- From: G . Frege
- Re: Is Truth Mysterious?
- From: Daryl McCullough
- Re: Book with this proof system for propositional logic
- From: G . Frege
- Re: The Power Set Reduced
- From: Chris Menzel
- Book with this proof system for propositional logic
- From: G Patel
- Re: Question about hypothetical syllogism
- From: G . Frege
- Re: Question about hypothetical syllogism
- From: G . Frege
- Re: Is Truth Mysterious?
- From: Neil W Rickert
- Re: The Power Set Reduced
- From: herbzet
- Re: Is Truth Mysterious?
- From: herbzet
- Re: Is Truth Mysterious?
- From: herbzet
- Re: Is Truth Mysterious?
- From: LauLuna
- Re: Question about hypothetical syllogism
- From: Jan Burse
- Re: Question about hypothetical syllogism
- From: Jan Burse
- Re: Question about hypothetical syllogism
- From: Jan Burse
- Re: Is Truth Mysterious?
- From: Daryl McCullough
- Re: Question about hypothetical syllogism
- From: G . Frege
- Re: Inconsistent = all sentences provable?
- From: george
- Re: The Power Set Reduced
- From: george
- Re: The Power Set Reduced
- From: george
- Re: The Power Set Reduced
- From: MoeBlee
- Re: The Power Set Reduced
- From: MoeBlee
- Re: The Power Set Reduced
- From: Aatu Koskensilta
- Re: The Power Set Reduced
- From: MoeBlee
- Re: The Power Set Reduced
- From: Aatu Koskensilta
- Re: Question about hypothetical syllogism
- From: G . Frege
- Re: Is Truth Mysterious?
- From: David Marcus
- Re: Is Truth Mysterious?
- From: george
- Re: Is Truth Mysterious?
- From: LauLuna
- Re: Is Truth Mysterious?
- From: LauLuna
- Re: Is Truth Mysterious?
- From: galathaea
- Re: The Power Set Reduced
- From: Frederick Williams
- Re: Is Truth Mysterious?
- From: Daryl McCullough
- Re: Question about hypothetical syllogism
- From: G . Frege
- Re: how to prove ~(P <--> Q) |- ~P <-->Q
- From: G . Frege
- Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?
- From: G . Frege
- Re: Is Truth Mysterious?
- From: Neil W Rickert
- Re: The Power Set Reduced
- From: Frederick Williams
- Re: This sentence is not true
- From: Newberry
- Re: Is Truth Mysterious?
- From: David Marcus
- Re: Is Truth Mysterious?
- From: herbzet
- Re: Is Truth Mysterious?
- From: David Marcus
- Re: Is Truth Mysterious?
- From: LauLuna
- Re: Is Truth Mysterious?
- From: LauLuna
- Re: Is Truth Mysterious?
- From: David Marcus
- Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?
- From: G . Frege
- Re: Is Truth Mysterious?
- From: LauLuna
- Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?
- From: herbzet
- Re: Is Truth Mysterious?
- From: herbzet
- Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?
- From: G . Frege
- Re: Inconsistent = all sentences provable?
- From: herbzet
- Re: Which theories hold a true but unprovable statement?
- From: george
- Re: Question about hypothetical syllogism
- From: G . Frege
- Re: Inconsistent = all sentences provable?
- From: george
- Re: Question about hypothetical syllogism
- From: translogi
- Re: Which theories hold a true but unprovable statement?
- From: george
- Re: Is Truth Mysterious?
- From: george
- Re: The Power Set Reduced
- From: MoeBlee
- Re: This sentence is not true
- From: David Marcus
- Re: Is Truth Mysterious?
- From: Daryl McCullough
- Re: Is Truth Mysterious?
- From: LauLuna
- Re: This sentence is not true
- From: Daryl McCullough
- Re: Is Truth Mysterious?
- From: Daryl McCullough
- Re: Is Truth Mysterious?
- From: Daryl McCullough
- Re: The Power Set Reduced
- From: LauLuna
- Re: Is Truth Mysterious?
- From: LauLuna
- Re: Is Truth Mysterious?
- From: LauLuna
- Re: This sentence is not true
- From: LauLuna
- Re: Which theories hold a true but unprovable statement?
- From: Chris Menzel
- Re: This sentence is not true
- From: Newberry
- Re: This sentence is not true
- From: David Marcus
- Re: This sentence is not true
- From: Newberry
- Re: Question about hypothetical syllogism
- From: Newberry
- Re: Is Truth Mysterious?
- From: herbzet
- Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?
- From: herbzet
- Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?
- From: G . Frege
- Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?
- From: G . Frege
- Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?
- From: Stephen Harris
- Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?
- From: G . Frege
- Re: Which theories hold a true but unprovable statement?
- From: herbzet
- Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?
- From: G . Frege
- Re: Is Truth Mysterious?
- From: Daryl McCullough
- Is Truth Mysterious?
- From: LauLuna
- Is Truth Mysterious?
- From: LauLuna
- Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?
- From: herbzet
- Re: Question about hypothetical syllogism
- From: G . Frege
- Re: The Power Set Reduced
- From: MoeBlee
- Re: This sentence is not true
- From: Daryl McCullough
- Re: The Power Set Reduced
- From: G . Frege
- Re: The Power Set Reduced
- From: george
- Re: This sentence is not true
- From: LauLuna
- Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?
- From: Bill Hale
- Re: Uncomputable numbers are all in your head
- From: David Marcus
- Re: The Power Set Reduced
- From: MoeBlee
- Re: The Power Set Paradox
- From: MoeBlee
- Re: Uncomputable numbers are all in your head
- From: Scott
- Re: The Power Set Paradox
- From: MoeBlee
- Re: This sentence is not true
- From: David Marcus
- Re: The Set of All Sets Exists
- From: MoeBlee
- Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?
- From: MoeBlee
- Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?
- From: MoeBlee
- Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?
- From: MoeBlee
- Re: Which theories hold a true but unprovable statement?
- From: george
- Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?
- From: G . Frege
- Re: Question about hypothetical syllogism
- From: G . Frege
- Re: You are all smart: what's the damned answer?
- From: John Jones
- Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?
- From: Alan Smaill
- Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?
- From: Alan Smaill
- Re: This sentence is not true
- From: aatu . koskensilta
- Re: Question about hypothetical syllogism
- From: G . Frege
- Re: Question about hypothetical syllogism
- From: G . Frege
- Re: Question about hypothetical syllogism
- From: translogi
- Re: Does This Ever Happen to Anyone Else?
- From: H. J. Sander Bruggink
- Re: Question about hypothetical syllogism
- From: G . Frege
- Re: Question about hypothetical syllogism
- From: G . Frege
- Re: Which is 'this' sentence
- From: R. Srinivasan
- Re: Question about hypothetical syllogism
- From: Newberry
- Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?
- From: herbzet
- Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?
- From: Norman Megill
- Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?
- From: G . Frege
- Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?
- From: G . Frege
- Re: Question about hypothetical syllogism
- From: G . Frege
- Re: The Set of All Sets Exists
- From: Gc
- Re: Inconsistent = all sentences provable?
- From: Peter_Smith
- Re: The Set of All Sets Exists
- From: G . Frege
- Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?
- From: David Marcus
- Re: The Set of All Sets Exists
- From: george
- Re: The Set of All Sets Exists
- From: G . Frege
- Re: The Set of All Sets Exists
- From: george
- Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?
- From: Charlie-Boo
- Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?
- From: David Marcus
- Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?
- From: Charlie-Boo
- Re: This sentence is not true
- From: David Marcus
- Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?
- From: Charlie-Boo
- Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?
- From: Charlie-Boo
- Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?
- From: Charlie-Boo
- Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?
- From: Charlie-Boo
- Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?
- From: Charlie-Boo
- Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?
- From: Charlie-Boo
- Re: Does This Ever Happen to Anyone Else?
- From: Charlie-Boo
- Re: The Set of All Sets Exists
- From: george
- Question about hypothetical syllogism
- From: Newberry
- Re: The Set of All Sets Exists
- From: george
- Re: This sentence is not true
- From: Newberry
- Re: Inconsistent = all sentences provable?
- From: Charlie-Boo
- Re: The Set of All Sets Exists
- From: george
- Re: Inconsistent = all sentences provable?
- From: george
- Re: This sentence is not true
- From: David Marcus
- Re: This sentence is not true
- From: Newberry
- Re: You are all smart: what's the damned answer?
- From: Jan Burse
- Re: This sentence is not true
- From: David Marcus
- Re: This sentence is not true
- From: David Marcus
- Re: This sentence is not true
- From: David Marcus
- Re: Mathematical induction in automated theorem prover
- From: Alan Smaill
- Re: The Power Set Paradox
- From: Alan Smaill
- Re: You are all smart: what's the damned answer?
- From: John Jones
- Re: Which theories hold a true but unprovable statement?
- From: Frederick Williams
- Re: This sentence is not true
- From: George Dance
- Re: Inconsistent = all sentences provable?
- From: G . Frege
- Re: Lorentz Contraction
- From: William Elliot
- Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?
- From: G . Frege
- Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?
- From: G . Frege
- Re: Inconsistent = all sentences provable?
- From: herbzet
- Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?
- From: herbzet
- Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?
- From: G . Frege
- Re: This sentence is not true
- From: Newberry
- Re: This sentence is not true
- From: Newberry
- Re: This sentence is not true
- From: Daryl McCullough
- Re: This sentence is not true
- From: Newberry
- Re: This sentence is not true
- From: Newberry
- Re: This sentence is not true
- From: Newberry
- Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?
- From: G . Frege
- Problem on Closed intervals Algorithm...Challenge!
- From: jake
- Re: Inconsistent = all sentences provable?
- From: Peter_Smith
- Re: Inconsistent = all sentences provable?
- From: Peter_Smith
- Lorentz Contraction
- From: John Jones
- Re: Inconsistent = all sentences provable?
- From: george
- Re: The Power Set Reduced
- From: george
- Re: The Power Set Reduced
- From: george
- Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?
- From: herbzet
- Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?
- From: herbzet
- Re: This sentence is not true
- From: David Marcus
- Re: This sentence is not true
- From: Daryl McCullough
- Re: This sentence is not true
- From: David Marcus
- Re: This sentence is not true
- From: Daryl McCullough
- Re: Which is 'this' sentence
- From: David Marcus
- Re: The Power Set Reduced
- From: Frederick Williams
- Re: Which is 'this' sentence
- From: R. Srinivasan
- Re: This sentence is not true
- From: David Marcus
- Re: Which is 'this' sentence
- From: David Marcus
- Re: Which is 'this' sentence
- From: R. Srinivasan
- Re: This sentence is not true
- From: Newberry
- Re: Which is 'this' sentence
- From: Daryl McCullough
- Re: The PICTURE LANGUAGE known as "Mathematics"
- From: Frederick Williams
- Re: Any popular theories discovered to be inconsistent?
- From: Frederick Williams
- Re: Which is 'this' sentence
- From: R. Srinivasan
- The Power Set Reduced
- From: victor72
- Re: Which is 'this' sentence
- From: R. Srinivasan
- Interesting algorithm...need insights..
- From: hank
- Re: Mathematical induction in automated theorem prover
- From: Lash Rambo
- Re: Mathematical induction in automated theorem prover
- From: Dan Christensen
- Re: This sentence is not true
- From: David Marcus
- Re: This sentence is not true
- From: Newberry
- Re: The Power Set Paradox
- From: G . Frege
- Re: The Power Set Paradox
- From: MoeBlee
- Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?
- From: G . Frege
- Re: The Power Set Paradox
- From: MoeBlee
- Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?
- From: G . Frege
- Re: The Power Set Paradox
- From: G . Frege
- Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?
- From: herbzet
- Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?
- From: herbzet
- Re: The Power Set Paradox
- From: G . Frege
- Re: The Power Set Paradox
- From: MoeBlee
- Re: The Power Set Paradox
- From: MoeBlee
- Re: Inconsistent = all sentences provable?
- From: G . Frege
- Re: The Set of All Sets Exists
- From: Nam D. Nguyen
- Re: The Set of All Sets Exists
- From: G . Frege
- Re: The Set of All Sets Exists
- From: Fuckwit
- Re: The Set of All Sets Exists
- From: G . Frege
- Re: The Power Set Paradox
- From: Chris Menzel
- Re: The Power Set Paradox
- From: Chris Menzel
- Re: The Set of All Sets Exists
- From: victor72
- Re: how to prove ~(P <--> Q) |- ~P <-->Q
- From: G . Frege
- Re: The Set of All Sets Exists
- From: george
- Re: The Set of All Sets Exists
- From: Ross A. Finlayson
- Re: Inconsistent = all sentences provable?
- From: Peter_Smith
- Re: The Set of All Sets Exists
- From: Ross A. Finlayson
- Re: The Set of All Sets Exists
- From: george
- Re: The Set of All Sets Exists
- From: george
- Re: The Set of All Sets Exists
- From: george
- Re: The Set of All Sets Exists
- From: george
- Re: The Set of All Sets Exists
- From: george
- Re: Inconsistent = all sentences provable?
- From: george
- Re: A creative philosophy of mathematics
- From: galathaea
- Re: sci.logic Comments
- From: Ross A. Finlayson
- Re: The Power Set Paradox
- From: MoeBlee
- Re: This sentence is not true
- From: David Marcus
- Re: Which is 'this' sentence
- From: Daryl McCullough
- Re: The Power Set Paradox
- From: MoeBlee
- Re: Any popular theories discovered to be inconsistent?
- From: MoeBlee
- Re: The Power Set Paradox
- From: aatu . koskensilta
- Re: The Power Set Paradox
- From: Chris Menzel
- Re: The Power Set Paradox
- From: aatu . koskensilta
- Re: The Power Set Paradox
- From: Chris Menzel
- Re: The Power Set Paradox
- From: MoeBlee
- Re: Which is 'this' sentence
- From: David Marcus
- Re: The Power Set Paradox
- From: aatu . koskensilta
- Re: how to prove ~(P <--> Q) |- ~P <-->Q
- From: translogi
- Re: The Power Set Paradox
- From: MoeBlee
- Re: The Power Set Paradox
- From: MoeBlee
- Re: The Power Set Paradox
- From: Chris Menzel
- Re: The Power Set Paradox
- From: aatu . koskensilta
- Re: The Power Set Paradox
- From: MoeBlee
- Re: Which is 'this' sentence
- From: R. Srinivasan
- Re: This sentence is not true
- From: David Marcus
- Re: This sentence is not true
- From: Daryl McCullough
- Re: how to prove ~(P <--> Q) |- ~P <-->Q
- From: George Dance
- Re: The Set of All Sets Exists
- From: victor72
- Re: Which is 'this' sentence
- From: Daryl McCullough
- Re: This sentence is not true
- From: Daryl McCullough
- Re: Which is 'this' sentence
- From: John Jones
- Re: Which is 'this' sentence
- From: John Jones
- Re: The Power Set Paradox
- From: aatu . koskensilta
- Re: Which is 'this' sentence
- From: R. Srinivasan
- Re: The Power Set Paradox
- From: ken.quirici@xxxxxxxxxx
- Re: The Set of All Sets Exists
- From: LauLuna
- Re: Which is 'this' sentence
- From: LauLuna
- Re: The Power Set Paradox
- From: aatu . koskensilta
- Re: Any popular theories discovered to be inconsistent?
- From: aatu . koskensilta
- Re: This sentence is not true
- From: Chris Menzel
- Re: This sentence is not true
- From: aatu . koskensilta
- Re: This sentence is not true
- From: LauLuna
- Re: Any popular theories discovered to be inconsistent?
- From: Frederick Williams
- Re: Which is 'this' sentence
- From: Daryl McCullough
- Re: This sentence is not true
- From: George Dance
- Re: The Power Set Paradox
- From: ken.quirici@xxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Any popular theories discovered to be inconsistent?
- From: aatu . koskensilta
- Re: Any popular theories discovered to be inconsistent?
- From: Arturo Magidin
- Re: A creative philosophy of mathematics
- From: aatu . koskensilta
- Re: Inconsistent = all sentences provable?
- From: G . Frege
- Re: Inconsistent = all sentences provable?
- From: aatu . koskensilta
- Re: Inconsistent = all sentences provable?
- From: Peter_Smith
- Re: Any popular theories discovered to be inconsistent?
- From: aatu . koskensilta
- Inconsistent = all sentences provable?
- From: jackbatlin
- Re: Any popular theories discovered to be inconsistent?
- From: jackbatlin
- Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?
- From: G . Frege
- Re: Which is 'this' sentence
- From: R. Srinivasan
- Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?
- From: G . Frege
- Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?
- From: G . Frege
- Re: Which is 'this' sentence
- From: John Jones
- Re: sci.logic Comments
- From: aatu . koskensilta
- Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?
- From: aatu . koskensilta
- Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?
- From: G . Frege
- Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?
- From: G . Frege
- Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?
- From: G . Frege
- Re: The Set of All Sets Exists
- From: G . Frege
- Re: Which theories hold a true but unprovable statement?
- From: Rupert
- Re: Any popular theories discovered to be inconsistent?
- From: aatu . koskensilta
- Re: This sentence is not true
- From: aatu . koskensilta
- Re: Which is 'this' sentence
- From: William Elliot
- Re: Which is 'this' sentence
- From: R. Srinivasan
- The Set of All Sets Exists
- From: victor72
- Re: how to prove ~(P <--> Q) |- ~P <-->Q
- From: R. Srinivasan
- Re: Any popular theories discovered to be inconsistent?
- From: Ross A. Finlayson
- Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?
- From: herbzet
- Re: Which is 'this' sentence
- From: R. Srinivasan
- Re: This sentence is not true
- From: galathaea
- Re: Which is 'this' sentence
- From: William Elliot
- Re: Which is 'this' sentence
- From: William Elliot
- Re: This sentence is not true
- From: David Marcus
- Re: This sentence is not true
- From: Newberry
- Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?
- From: G . Frege
- Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?
- From: G . Frege
- Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?
- From: G . Frege
- Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?
- From: G . Frege
- Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?
- From: G . Frege
- Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?
- From: herbzet
- Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?
- From: G . Frege
- Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?
- From: G . Frege
- Re: how to prove ~(P <--> Q) |- ~P <-->Q
- From: G . Frege
- Re: Strange models of propositional logic
- From: Jan Burse
- Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?
- From: G . Frege
- Re: Strange models of propositional logic
- From: John Jones
- Re: Which is 'this' sentence
- From: John Jones
- Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?
- From: David Marcus
- Re: The Power Set Paradox
- From: MoeBlee
- Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?
- From: G . Frege
- Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?
- From: G . Frege
- Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?
- From: Norman Megill
- Re: The Power Set Paradox
- From: ken.quirici@xxxxxxxxxx
- Re: The Power Set Paradox
- From: ken.quirici@xxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?
- From: Alan Smaill
- Re: Which is 'this' sentence
- From: John Jones
- Re: Which is 'this' sentence
- From: John Jones
- Re: Strange models of propositional logic
- From: Jan Burse
- Re: The Power Set Paradox
- From: Ross A. Finlayson
- Re: Which theories hold a true but unprovable statement?
- From: george
- Re: Which theories hold a true but unprovable statement?
- From: george
- Re: Which theories hold a true but unprovable statement?
- From: george
- Re: The Power Set Paradox
- From: george
- Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?
- From: MoeBlee
- Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?
- From: David Marcus
- Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?
- From: Bill Hale
- Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?
- From: G . Frege
- Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?
- From: David Marcus
- Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?
- From: G . Frege
- Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?
- From: Daryl McCullough
- Re: The Power Set Paradox
- From: MoeBlee
- Re: how to prove ~(P <--> Q) |- ~P <-->Q
- From: G . Frege
- Re: Help with the following algorithm about Intervals..!
- From: bartmate
- Re: how to prove ~(P <--> Q) |- ~P <-->Q
- From: G . Frege
- Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?
- From: Bill Hale
- Re: Which is 'this' sentence
- From: Daryl McCullough
- Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?
- From: Charlie-Boo
- Re: how to prove ~(P <--> Q) |- ~P <-->Q
- From: translogi
- Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?
- From: Charlie-Boo
- Re: Which is 'this' sentence
- From: R. Srinivasan
- Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?
- From: Charlie-Boo
- Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?
- From: Bill Hale
- Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?
- From: G . Frege
- Help with the following algorithm about Intervals..!
- From: jake
- Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?
- From: Norman Megill
- Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?
- From: Bill Hale
- Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?
- From: Bill Hale
- Re: Which is 'this' sentence
- From: R. Srinivasan
- Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?
- From: Alan Smaill
- Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?
- From: Charlie-Boo
- Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?
- From: Charlie-Boo
- Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?
- From: Charlie-Boo
- Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?
- From: Norman Megill
- Re: Which is 'this' sentence
- From: John Jones
- Re: Which is 'this' sentence
- From: John Jones
- Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?
- From: Charlie-Boo
- Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?
- From: Charlie-Boo
- Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?
- From: G . Frege
- Re: Which is 'this' sentence
- From: Daryl McCullough
- Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?
- From: G . Frege
- Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?
- From: G . Frege
- Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?
- From: G . Frege
- Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?
- From: Charlie-Boo
- Re: Which is 'this' sentence
- From: William Elliot
- Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?
- From: Norman Megill
- Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?
- From: Charlie-Boo
- Re: Does This Ever Happen to Anyone Else?
- From: H. J. Sander Bruggink
- Re: how to computably enumerate "computable sequences of computably enumerable sets"
- From: David C . Ullrich
- Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?
- From: G . Frege
- Re: Does This Ever Happen to Anyone Else?
- From: Alan Smaill
- Re: Which is 'this' sentence
- From: R. Srinivasan
- Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?
- From: Alan Smaill
- Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?
- From: Norman Megill
- Re: Which is 'this' sentence
- From: R. Srinivasan
- Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?
- From: Bill Hale
- Re: Which is 'this' sentence
- From: William Elliot
- Re: The Power Set Paradox
- From: victor72
- Re: The Power Set Paradox
- From: victor72
- Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?
- From: David Marcus
- Re: Does This Ever Happen to Anyone Else?
- From: Charlie-Boo
- Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?
- From: Charlie-Boo
- Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?
- From: David Marcus
- Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?
- From: Charlie-Boo
- Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?
- From: Charlie-Boo
- Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?
- From: Charlie-Boo
- Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?
- From: Charlie-Boo
- Re: The Power Set Paradox
- From: Ross A. Finlayson
- Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?
- From: Bill Hale
- Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?
- From: Daryl McCullough
- Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?
- From: Bill Hale
- Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?
- From: David Marcus
- Re: The Power Set Paradox
- From: David Marcus
- Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?
- From: Charlie-Boo
- Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?
- From: Charlie-Boo
- Re: The Power Set Paradox
- From: victor72
- Re: This sentence is not true
- From: David Marcus
- Re: This sentence is not true
- From: Newberry
- Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?
- From: herbzet
- Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?
- From: G . Frege
- Re: Which theories hold a true but unprovable statement?
- From: Rupert
- Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?
- From: herbzet
- Re: Which is 'this' sentence
- From: marcia
- Re: BOING BOING BOING EINBOING STEINBOING
- From: John Jones
- Re: "Sentential logic" as a theory or as a "framework" for theories?
- From: jackbatlin
- Which is 'this' sentence
- From: John Jones
- Re: A creative philosophy of mathematics
- From: Peter_Smith
- Re: The Power Set Paradox
- From: Chris Menzel
- Re: The Power Set Paradox
- From: MoeBlee
- Re: This sentence is not true
- From: David Marcus
- Re: "Sentential logic" as a theory or as a "framework" for theories?
- From: Arturo Magidin
- Re: This sentence is not true
- From: Daryl McCullough
- Re: how to computably enumerate "computable sequences of computably enumerable sets"
- From: asdf
- Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?
- From: Alan Smaill
- Re: Does This Ever Happen to Anyone Else?
- From: Alan Smaill
- Re: This sentence is not true
- From: Daryl McCullough
- Re: how to prove ~(P <--> Q) |- ~P <-->Q
- From: G . Frege
- Re: Which theories hold a true but unprovable statement?
- From: jackbatlin
- Re: "Sentential logic" as a theory or as a "framework" for theories?
- From: jackbatlin
- Re: This sentence is not true
- From: LauLuna
- Re: This sentence is not true
- From: Newberry
- Re: Which theories hold a true but unprovable statement?
- From: Frederick Williams
- Re: "Sentential logic" as a theory or as a "framework" for theories?
- From: Frederick Williams
- Which theories hold a true but unprovable statement?
- From: jackbatlin
- "Sentential logic" as a theory or as a "framework" for theories?
- From: jackbatlin
- Re: how to prove ~(P <--> Q) |- ~P <-->Q
- From: R. Srinivasan
- Re: how to computably enumerate "computable sequences of computably enumerable sets"
- From: David C . Ullrich
- Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?
- From: David C . Ullrich
- how to computably enumerate "computable sequences of computably enumerable sets"
- From: asdf
- Re: how to prove ~(P <--> Q) |- ~P <-->Q
- From: G . Frege
- Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?
- From: G . Frege
- Re: The Power Set Paradox
- From: victor72
- Re: Goedel's proof
- From: Peter_Smith
- Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?
- From: G . Frege
- Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?
- From: G . Frege
- Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?
- From: G . Frege
- Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?
- From: G . Frege
- Re: This sentence is not true
- From: David Marcus
- Re: This sentence is not true
- From: Newberry
- Re: This sentence is not true
- From: Newberry
- Re: how to prove ~(P <--> Q) |- ~P <-->Q
- From: Charlie-Boo
- Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?
- From: Bill Hale
- Re: how to prove ~(P <--> Q) |- ~P <-->Q
- From: Charlie-Boo
- Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?
- From: Charlie-Boo
- Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?
- From: Charlie-Boo
- Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?
- From: Charlie-Boo
- Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?
- From: Charlie-Boo
- Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?
- From: Charlie-Boo
- Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?
- From: Charlie-Boo
- Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?
- From: Charlie-Boo
- Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?
- From: Charlie-Boo
- Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?
- From: Charlie-Boo
- Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?
- From: Charlie-Boo
- Re: Goedel's proof
- From: Charlie-Boo
- Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?
- From: herbzet
- Re: Solve for x in eqn1 substitute in for x in eqn2
- From: Luke Wu
- Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?
- From: herbzet
- Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?
- From: herbzet
- Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?
- From: herbzet
- Re: This sentence is not true
- From: David Marcus
- Re: The Power Set Paradox
- From: G . Frege
- Re: The Power Set Paradox
- From: victor72
- Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?
- From: G . Frege
- Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?
- From: G . Frege
- Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?
- From: Bill Hale
- Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?
- From: G . Frege
- Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?
- From: G . Frege
- Re: This sentence is not true
- From: Daryl McCullough
- Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?
- From: G . Frege
- Re: Uncomputable numbers are all in your head
- From: David Marcus
- Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?
- From: Charlie-Boo
- Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?
- From: Charlie-Boo
- Re: This sentence is not true
- From: David Marcus
- Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?
- From: Charlie-Boo
- Re: This sentence is not true
- From: John Jones
- Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?
- From: Charlie-Boo
- Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?
- From: Charlie-Boo
- Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?
- From: Fuckwit
- Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?
- From: Charlie-Boo
- Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?
- From: Charlie-Boo
- Re: Strange models of propositional logic
- From: LauLuna
- Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?
- From: Charlie-Boo
- Re: Uncomputable numbers are all in your head
- From: Scott
- Re: Uncomputable numbers are all in your head
- From: Scott
- Re: This sentence is not true
- From: aatu . koskensilta
- Re: This sentence is not true
- From: LauLuna
- Re: This sentence is not true
- From: David Marcus
- Re: how to prove ~(P <--> Q) |- ~P <-->Q
- From: G . Frege
- Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?
- From: G . Frege
- Re: Strange models of propositional logic
- From: Jan Burse
- Re: Strange models of propositional logic
- From: Jan Burse
- Re: Strange models of propositional logic
- From: Jan Burse
- Re: This sentence is not true
- From: Daryl McCullough
- Re: how to prove ~(P <--> Q) |- ~P <-->Q
- From: G . Frege
- Re: Completeness and incompleteness
- From: Arturo Magidin
- Re: Completeness and incompleteness
- From: Lee Rudolph
- Completeness and incompleteness
- From: jackbatlin
- Re: The Power Set Paradox
- From: LauLuna
- Re: This sentence is not true
- From: LauLuna
- Re: This sentence is not true
- From: LauLuna
- Re: This sentence is not true
- From: aatu . koskensilta
- Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?
- From: David C . Ullrich
- Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?
- From: David C . Ullrich
- Re: The Power Set Paradox
- From: Chris Menzel
- Re: Goedel's proof
- From: Peter_Smith
- Re: Goedel's proof
- From: Charlie-Boo
- The Power Set Paradox
- From: victor72
- Re: This sentence is not true
- From: Daryl McCullough
- Re: This sentence is not true
- From: Daryl McCullough
- Re: This sentence is not true
- From: Newberry
- Re: This sentence is not true
- From: Newberry
- Re: This sentence is not true
- From: Newberry
- Re: This sentence is not true
- From: Newberry
- Re: Strange models of propositional logic
- From: Jan Burse
- Re: Strange models of propositional logic
- From: Jan Burse
- Re: sci.logic Comments
- From: Ross A. Finlayson
- Re: Goedel's proof
- From: Peter_Smith
- Re: Goedel's proof
- From: Charlie-Boo
- Re: Does This Ever Happen to Anyone Else?
- From: Charlie-Boo
- Re: Strange models of propositional logic
- From: Jan Burse
- Re: Does This Ever Happen to Anyone Else?
- From: Fuckwit
- Re: This sentence is not true
- From: galathaea
- Re: Goedel's proof
- From: george
- Re: This sentence is not true
- From: David Marcus
- Re: This sentence is not true
- From: John Jones
- Re: This sentence is not true
- From: george
- Re: This sentence is not true
- From: george
- Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?
- From: Alan Smaill
- Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?
- From: Bill Hale
- Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?
- From: Bill Hale
- Re: This sentence is not true
- From: Chris Menzel
- Re: This sentence is not true
- From: David Marcus
- Re: Goedel's proof
- From: Peter_Smith
- Re: Is {{}} a valid construct?
- From: Neo
- Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?
- From: herbzet
- Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?
- From: Charlie-Boo
- Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?
- From: herbzet
- Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?
- From: Charlie-Boo
- Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?
- From: Charlie-Boo
- Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?
- From: Charlie-Boo
- Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?
- From: Charlie-Boo
- Re: This sentence is not true
- From: Daryl McCullough
- Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?
- From: Charlie-Boo
- Re: Does This Ever Happen to Anyone Else?
- From: Charlie-Boo
- Re: Does This Ever Happen to Anyone Else?
- From: Charlie-Boo
- Re: Does This Ever Happen to Anyone Else?
- From: Fuckwit
- Re: Does This Ever Happen to Anyone Else?
- From: Fuckwit
- Re: Does This Ever Happen to Anyone Else?
- From: Alan Smaill
- Re: Does This Ever Happen to Anyone Else?
- From: Charlie-Boo
- Re: Does This Ever Happen to Anyone Else?
- From: Charlie-Boo
- Re: Does This Ever Happen to Anyone Else?
- From: Charlie-Boo
- Re: Does This Ever Happen to Anyone Else?
- From: Charlie-Boo
- Re: This sentence is not true
- From: G . Frege
- Re: This sentence is not true
- From: LauLuna
- Re: Goedel's proof
- From: Charlie-Boo
- Re: Physics comments from math/logic types?
- From: LauLuna
- Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?
- From: Fuckwit
- how to prove ~(P <--> Q) |- ~P <-->Q
- From: translogi
- Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?
- From: Fuckwit
- Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?
- From: Fuckwit
- Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?
- From: G . Frege
- Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?
- From: David C . Ullrich
- Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?
- From: David C . Ullrich
- Re: sci.logic Comments
- From: aatu . koskensilta
- Re: This sentence is not true
- From: aatu . koskensilta
- Re: Does This Ever Happen to Anyone Else?
- From: Alan Smaill
- Re: Does This Ever Happen to Anyone Else?
- From: Alan Smaill
- Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?
- From: Charlie-Boo
- Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?
- From: Charlie-Boo
- Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?
- From: Charlie-Boo
- Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?
- From: Fuckwit
- Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?
- From: Charlie-Boo
- Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?
- From: Charlie-Boo
- Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?
- From: Charlie-Boo
- Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?
- From: Charlie-Boo
- Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?
- From: Charlie-Boo
- Re: Mathematical induction in automated theorem prover
- From: William Elliot
- Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?
- From: Charlie-Boo
- Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?
- From: Charlie-Boo
- Re: This sentence is not true
- From: David Marcus
- This sentence is not true
- From: Newberry
- Re: Does This Ever Happen to Anyone Else?
- From: Lee Rudolph
- Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?
- From: Bill Hale
- Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?
- From: Charlie-Boo
- Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?
- From: Bill Hale
- Re: Reflections on Free Will and Proposed Perfect Knowledge of God
- From: David
- Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?
- From: Charlie-Boo
- Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?
- From: Charlie-Boo
- Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?
- From: Charlie-Boo
- Re: Does This Ever Happen to Anyone Else?
- From: Charlie-Boo
- Re: Does This Ever Happen to Anyone Else?
- From: Fuckwit
- Re: sci.logic Comments
- From: Ross A. Finlayson
- Re: Mathematical induction in automated theorem prover
- From: Lash Rambo
- Re: Strange models of propositional logic
- From: John Jones
- Re: Strange models of propositional logic
- From: LauLuna
- Strange models of propositional logic
- From: LauLuna
- Re: Goedel's proof
- From: Newberry
- Re: DOUBLE ALBERT BURGER WITH FRIES POPULAR IN EINSTEIN TAKEAWAY
- From: John Jones
- Re: Mathematical induction in automated theorem prover
- From: David C . Ullrich
- Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?
- From: David C . Ullrich
- Re: Set puzzle explained
- From: John Jones
- Re: Mathematical induction in automated theorem prover
- From: William Elliot
- Re: Mathematical induction in automated theorem prover
- From: Lash Rambo
- Re: Mathematical induction in automated theorem prover
- From: William Elliot
- Re: From Pythagoras to programming
- From: Nicki
- Re: Does This Ever Happen to Anyone Else?
- From: Charlie-Boo
- Re: Does This Ever Happen to Anyone Else?
- From: Charlie-Boo
- Re: Does This Ever Happen to Anyone Else?
- From: Charlie-Boo
- Re: Mathematical induction in automated theorem prover
- From: Lash Rambo
- Re: Does This Ever Happen to Anyone Else?
- From: Charlie-Boo
- Re: Does This Ever Happen to Anyone Else?
- From: Alan Smaill
- Re: Does This Ever Happen to Anyone Else?
- From: Charlie-Boo
- Re: Does This Ever Happen to Anyone Else?
- From: Charlie-Boo
- Re: Does This Ever Happen to Anyone Else?
- From: Alan Smaill
- Re: Constructive math query:- Countable orders
- From: Keith Ramsay
- Re: Goedel's proof
- From: Nam D. Nguyen
- Re: Does This Ever Happen to Anyone Else?
- From: Fuckwit
- Re: Does This Ever Happen to Anyone Else?
- From: Charlie-Boo
- Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?
- From: Bill Hale
- Re: Goedel's proof
- From: Peter_Smith
- Re: sci.logic Comments
- From: aatu . koskensilta
- Re: Goedel's proof
- From: Peter_Smith
- Re: Does This Ever Happen to Anyone Else?
- From: Charlie-Boo
- Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?
- From: Bill Hale
- Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?
- From: David Marcus
- sci.logic Comments
- From: Ross A. Finlayson
- Re: Goedel's proof
- From: Charlie-Boo
- Re: Goedel's proof
- From: Charlie-Boo
- Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?
- From: Charlie-Boo
- Re: Goedel's proof
- From: R. Srinivasan
- Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?
- From: Charlie-Boo
- Re: Goedel's proof
- From: george
- Re: Goedel's proof
- From: george
- Re: Goedel's proof
- From: george
- Re: Ve?
- From: G . Frege
- Re: Does This Ever Happen to Anyone Else?
- From: Charlie-Boo
- Re: Mathematical induction in automated theorem prover
- From: David C . Ullrich
- Re: Does This Ever Happen to Anyone Else?
- From: David C . Ullrich
- Re: Does This Ever Happen to Anyone Else?
- From: David C . Ullrich
- Re: Mathematical induction in automated theorem prover
- From: William Elliot
- Re: Goedel's proof
- From: LauLuna
- Re: Goedel's proof
- From: Peter_Smith
- Re: Mathematical induction in automated theorem prover
- From: Lash Rambo
- Re: Does This Ever Happen to Anyone Else?
- From: Chris Menzel
- Re: Constructive math query:- Countable orders
- From: Keith Ramsay
- attn: curcio - extremely super mp3 music - dem - (1/1)
- From: panchito
- Re: Does This Ever Happen to Anyone Else?
- From: Charlie-Boo
- Re: Mathematical induction in automated theorem prover
- From: William Elliot
- Re: Does This Ever Happen to Anyone Else?
- From: Charlie-Boo
- Re: Goedel's proof
- From: Charlie-Boo
- Re: Goedel's proof
- From: Nam Nguyen
- Re: Goedel's proof
- From: Charlie-Boo
- Re: Goedel's proof
- From: Charlie-Boo
- Re: Goedel's proof
- From: Charlie-Boo
- Re: Is {{}} a valid construct?
- From: Charlie-Boo
- Re: Goedel's proof
- From: Newberry
- Re: Is {{}} a valid construct?
- From: Charlie-Boo
- Re: Is {{}} a valid construct?
- From: Charlie-Boo
- Re: Set puzzle explained
- From: David Marcus
- Re: Goedel's proof
- From: Charlie-Boo
- Re: Uncomputable numbers are all in your head
- From: David Marcus
- Re: Goedel's proof
- From: Peter_Smith
- Re: Mathematical induction in automated theorem prover
- From: Lash Rambo
- Re: Goedel's proof
- From: Charlie-Boo
- Re: Mathematical induction in automated theorem prover
- From: Lash Rambo
- Re: Mathematical induction in automated theorem prover
- From: Lash Rambo
- Re: Uncomputable numbers are all in your head
- From: MoeBlee
- Re: From Pythagoras to programming
- From: John Jones
- Re: Goedel's proof
- From: Peter_Smith
- Re: Set puzzle explained
- From: John Jones
- Re: Set puzzle explained
- From: Jan Burse
- Re: Uncomputable numbers are all in your head
- From: Scott
- Set puzzle explained
- From: John Jones
- Re: Does This Ever Happen to Anyone Else?
- From: minsky@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Uncomputable numbers are all in your head
- From: MoeBlee
- Re: Uncomputable numbers are all in your head
- From: MoeBlee
- Re: Uncomputable numbers are all in your head
- From: Scott
- Re: Does This Ever Happen to Anyone Else?
- From: Chris Menzel
- Re: Request for clarification of what is a non first-order definable set.
- From: Scott
- Re: Can ZFC prove Addition is Associative?
- From: Charlie-Boo
- Re: Mathematical induction in automated theorem prover
- From: Jan Burse
- Re: Mathematical induction in automated theorem prover
- From: Jan Burse
- Re: Ve?
- From: Jan Burse
- Re: Goedel's proof
- From: Charlie-Boo
- Re: Goedel's proof
- From: Chris Menzel
- Re: Proof
- From: Tom
- Re: Proof
- From: Tom
- Re: Does This Ever Happen to Anyone Else?
- From: Chris Menzel
- Re: Five things morons believe
- From: Charlie-Boo
- Re: "The mathematical universe is strongly typed"
- From: abo
- Re: Goedel's proof
- From: Charlie-Boo
- Re: Does This Ever Happen to Anyone Else?
- From: Charlie-Boo
- Re: Does This Ever Happen to Anyone Else?
- From: Charlie-Boo
- Re: Mathematical induction in automated theorem prover
- From: Charlie-Boo
- Re: Set Puzzle
- From: Charlie-Boo
- Set Puzzle
- From: John Jones
- Re: "The mathematical universe is strongly typed"
- From: Peter_Smith
- Re: Physics comments from math/logic types?
- From: John Jones
- Re: Set of certainties
- From: John Jones
- Re: Mathematical induction in automated theorem prover
- From: David C . Ullrich
- Re: Mathematical induction in automated theorem prover
- From: William Elliot
- Mathematical induction in automated theorem prover
- From: Lash Rambo
- Re: Wasabiburn unites with internets
- From: AndyMC
- Re: Set of certainties
- From: Nam D. Nguyen
- Re: Proof
- From: Dan Christensen
- Re: Global Warming and the White House Conspiracy
- From: William Elliot
- Re: Ve?
- From: Charlie-Boo
- Re: Halting problem totally unsolvable?
- From: Charlie-Boo
- Re: Does This Ever Happen to Anyone Else?
- From: Charlie-Boo
- Re: Does This Ever Happen to Anyone Else?
- From: Charlie-Boo
- Re: Does This Ever Happen to Anyone Else?
- From: Charlie-Boo
- Re: Proof
- From: herbzet
- Re: Goedel's proof
- From: Chris Menzel
- Re: Is Validity Just a Hypothetical or Conditional Characteristic?
- From: herbzet
- Re: Halting problem totally unsolvable?
- From: Charlie-Boo
- Re: Goedel's proof
- From: Charlie-Boo
- Set of certainties
- From: John Jones
- Re: CROSSPOSTING TO LOGIC SITE BY ATHEIST MORON
- From: John Jones
- Wear and tear
- From: John Jones
- Re: Proof
- From: Tom
- Re: Reflections on Free Will and Proposed Perfect Knowledge of God
- From: aktivator99
- Re: Proof
- From: Tom
- Re: Is Validity Just a Hypothetical or Conditional Characteristic?
- From: Jan Burse
- Re: Reflections on Free Will and Proposed Perfect Knowledge of God
- From: R. Srinivasan
- Re: "The mathematical universe is strongly typed"
- From: abo
- Re: Constructive math query:- Countable orders
- From: LauLuna
- Re: Reflections on Free Will and Proposed Perfect Knowledge of God
- From: LauLuna
- Re: Ve?
- From: G . Frege
- Global Warming and the White House Conspiracy
- From: carter . sterling
- Re: Reflections on Free Will and Proposed Perfect Knowledge of God
- From: Stephen Harris
- Re: Ve?
- From: G . Frege
- Re: Ve?
- From: Frederick Williams
- Re: "The mathematical universe is strongly typed"
- From: Peter_Smith
- Re: Reflections on Free Will and Proposed Perfect Knowledge of God
- From: Daryl McCullough
- Re: Reflections on Free Will and Proposed Perfect Knowledge of God
- From: Daryl McCullough
- Re: Reflections on Free Will and Proposed Perfect Knowledge of God
- From: guenther vonKnakspot
- Re: Is Validity Just a Hypothetical or Conditional Characteristic?
- From: herbzet
- Re: Ve?
- From: William Elliot
- Re: "The mathematical universe is strongly typed"
- From: abo
- Ve?
- From: Mad_man_on_a_MissIon
- Re: Reflections on Free Will and Proposed Perfect Knowledge of God
- From: Stephen Harris
- Re: Proof
- From: dc
- Re: Reflections on Free Will and Proposed Perfect Knowledge of God
- From: Stephen Harris
- Re: Is Validity Just a Hypothetical or Conditional Characteristic?
- From: Jan Burse
- Re: Is Validity Just a Hypothetical or Conditional Characteristic?
- From: Jan Burse
- [FAQ, 06/11/05] Mathematical logic on the web
- From: Boris 'pi' Piwinger
- Re: Inconceivable
- From: Stephen Harris
- Re: Reflections on Free Will and Proposed Perfect Knowledge of God
- From: Stephen Harris
- Re: Reflections on Free Will and Proposed Perfect Knowledge of God
- From: Stephen Harris
- Re: Reflections on Free Will and Proposed Perfect Knowledge of God
- From: Stephen Harris
- Re: Proof
- From: John Jones
- Re: Reflections on Free Will and Proposed Perfect Knowledge of God
- From: Daryl McCullough
- representation of monotone boolean functions
- From: sasha mal