Re: Which is 'this' sentence
- From: David Marcus <DavidMarcus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 10 Feb 2007 13:18:19 -0500
R. Srinivasan wrote:
On Feb 10, 9:34 pm, David Marcus <DavidMar...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
What do your quotes on "particles" and "trajectories" mean?
Non-local nature of particles is what is problematic, according to my
understanding. In the Copenhagen interpretation, the superposition of
trajectories, etc. need not be real. But the non-locality in Bohmian
mechanics corresponds to reality. I could be wrong here.
The motion of a given particle is determined by the wave function, and
the latter is a function of the positions of all particles (including
those far away). However, each particle has a definite position at all
times.
Bell proved that any theory that matches experiment must be non-local.
The Copenhagen interpretation manages to obscure the non-locality by
being vague.
--
David Marcus
.
- References:
- This sentence is not true
- From: Newberry
- Re: Which is 'this' sentence
- From: R. Srinivasan
- Re: Which is 'this' sentence
- From: Daryl McCullough
- Re: Which is 'this' sentence
- From: R. Srinivasan
- Re: Which is 'this' sentence
- From: David Marcus
- Re: Which is 'this' sentence
- From: R. Srinivasan
- Re: Which is 'this' sentence
- From: David Marcus
- Re: Which is 'this' sentence
- From: R. Srinivasan
- This sentence is not true
- Prev by Date: Re: The Power Set Reduced
- Next by Date: Re: This sentence is not true
- Previous by thread: Re: Which is 'this' sentence
- Next by thread: Re: Which is 'this' sentence
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|