Re: OUTGOEDELING A HUMAN?
- From: "abo" <dkfjdklj@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 21 Feb 2007 06:59:04 -0800
On Feb 21, 3:22 pm, stevendaryl3...@xxxxxxxxx (Daryl McCullough)
wrote:
Aatu Koskensilta says...
The same argument applies to any
explication for truth in context of statements such as the liar,
demonstrating that 'truth' is an "indefinitely extensible" concept.
Right. I think that resolves all the semantics paradoxes nicely.
Well it would if one could make sense of "indefinitely extensible"
concept. Since I can't, I don't find it a resolution at all.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: OUTGOEDELING A HUMAN?
- From: aatu . koskensilta
- Re: OUTGOEDELING A HUMAN?
- From: Daryl McCullough
- Re: OUTGOEDELING A HUMAN?
- References:
- OUTGOEDELING A HUMAN?
- From: LauLuna
- Re: OUTGOEDELING A HUMAN?
- From: Daryl McCullough
- Re: OUTGOEDELING A HUMAN?
- From: Aatu Koskensilta
- Re: OUTGOEDELING A HUMAN?
- From: Daryl McCullough
- Re: OUTGOEDELING A HUMAN?
- From: Aatu Koskensilta
- Re: OUTGOEDELING A HUMAN?
- From: Daryl McCullough
- OUTGOEDELING A HUMAN?
- Prev by Date: Re: OUTGOEDELING A HUMAN?
- Next by Date: Re: This sentence is not true
- Previous by thread: Re: OUTGOEDELING A HUMAN?
- Next by thread: Re: OUTGOEDELING A HUMAN?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|