sci.logic

• Date Index

• Operations Research Systems Engineer in Enterprise Knowledge-Based System at National Laboratory, ORNL Postdoc Recruiter
• Help with proof in Gentzen's system NK, Jöran Egdahl
  • Re: Help with proof in Gentzen's system NK, G . Frege
    • Re: Help with proof in Gentzen's system NK, Jöran Egdahl
      • Re: Help with proof in Gentzen's system NK, G . Frege
  • Re: Help with proof in Gentzen's system NK, Alan Smaill
• logic, yes, steverob
• questions and answers, luigivanzan
  • Re: questions and answers, Frederick Williams
    • Re: questions and answers, luigivanzan
      • Re: questions and answers, translogi
    • Re: questions and answers, David C . Ullrich
• No Answerer Speak., Douglas Eagleson
• Difficulty using LAteX, Johnny
  • Re: Difficulty using LAteX, Arturo Magidin
    • Re: Difficulty using LAteX, Johnny
      • Re: Difficulty using LAteX, Arturo Magidin
      • Re: Difficulty using LAteX, Johnny
      • Re: Difficulty using LAteX, Johnny
      • Re: Difficulty using LAteX, Arturo Magidin
      • Re: Difficulty using LAteX, Johnny
• Definition please, John Jones
  • Re: Definition please, translogi
    • Re: Definition please, John Jones
      • Re: Definition please, Alan Smaill
      • Re: Definition please, John Jones
      • Re: Definition please, translogi
      • Re: Definition please, John Jones
      • Re: Definition please, herbzet
      • Re: Definition please, translogi
      • Re: Definition please, John Jones
      • Re: Definition please, Alan Smaill
      • Re: Definition please, John Jones
      • Re: Definition please, Alan Smaill
      • Re: Definition please, John Jones
• Someone sent that to me and I laughed the entire morning....I couldn't stop it....It's so funny...., fringo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
• "Natural" coincidence and Set Theory in SR, philneo2001
• Minimal set theory for model theory?, Bill Taylor
  • Re: Minimal set theory for model theory?, LauLuna
  • Re: Minimal set theory for model theory?, LauLuna
    • Re: Minimal set theory for model theory?, george
      • Re: Minimal set theory for model theory?, LauLuna
      • Re: Minimal set theory for model theory?, LauLuna
      • Re: Minimal set theory for model theory?, george
      • Re: Minimal set theory for model theory?, LauLuna
      • Re: Minimal set theory for model theory?, george
      • Re: Minimal set theory for model theory?, george
  • Re: Minimal set theory for model theory?, MoeBlee
    • Re: Minimal set theory for model theory?, Aatu Koskensilta
      • Re: Minimal set theory for model theory?, MoeBlee
      • Re: Minimal set theory for model theory?, Aatu Koskensilta
      • Re: Minimal set theory for model theory?, MoeBlee
      • Re: Minimal set theory for model theory?, MoeBlee
      • Re: Minimal set theory for model theory?, Aatu Koskensilta
      • Re: Minimal set theory for model theory?, MoeBlee
      • Re: Minimal set theory for model theory?, Alan Smaill
      • Re: Minimal set theory for model theory?, Aatu Koskensilta
      • Re: Minimal set theory for model theory?, MoeBlee
  • Re: Minimal set theory for model theory?, Frederick Williams
    • Re: Minimal set theory for model theory?, Aatu Koskensilta
      • Re: Minimal set theory for model theory?, Frederick Williams
  • Re: Minimal set theory for model theory?, Keith Ramsay
    • Re: Minimal set theory for model theory?, george
• JOHN JONES PLEASE STOP REPEATING VALEV'S SCREED - WE DON'T WANT IT, Phineas T Puddleduck
• Descriptions, Presuppositions, Liar, Gödel, Newberry
  • Re: Descriptions, Presuppositions, Liar,..., Jesse F. Hughes
    • Re: Descriptions, Presuppositions, Liar,..., Newberry
      • Re: Descriptions, Presuppositions, Liar,..., Jesse F. Hughes
      • Re: Descriptions, Presuppositions, Liar,..., Newberry
      • Re: Descriptions, Presuppositions, Liar,..., Jesse F. Hughes
      • Re: Descriptions, Presuppositions, Liar,..., David C . Ullrich
      • Re: Descriptions, Presuppositions, Liar,..., David C . Ullrich
      • Re: Descriptions, Presuppositions, Liar,..., Newberry
      • Re: Descriptions, Presuppositions, Liar,..., Jesse F. Hughes
      • Re: Descriptions, Presuppositions, Liar,..., Jesse F. Hughes
      • Re: Descriptions, Presuppositions, Liar,..., Newberry
      • Re: Descriptions, Presuppositions, Liar,..., Jesse F. Hughes
      • Re: Descriptions, Presuppositions, Liar,..., Newberry
      • Re: Descriptions, Presuppositions, Liar,..., Jesse F. Hughes
      • Re: Descriptions, Presuppositions, Liar,..., David C . Ullrich
      • Re: Descriptions, Presuppositions, Liar,..., Newberry
      • Re: Descriptions, Presuppositions, Liar,..., David C . Ullrich
      • Re: Descriptions, Presuppositions, Liar,..., Newberry
      • Re: Descriptions, Presuppositions, Liar,..., Daryl McCullough
      • Re: Descriptions, Presuppositions, Liar,..., Newberry
      • Re: Descriptions, Presuppositions, Liar,..., Daryl McCullough
      • Re: Descriptions, Presuppositions, Liar,..., David C . Ullrich
      • Re: Descriptions, Presuppositions, Liar,..., Newberry
      • Re: Descriptions, Presuppositions, Liar,..., Daryl McCullough
      • Re: Descriptions, Presuppositions, Liar,..., Newberry
      • Re: Descriptions, Presuppositions, Liar,..., David C . Ullrich
      • Re: Descriptions, Presuppositions, Liar,..., Newberry
      • Re: Descriptions, Presuppositions, Liar,..., David C . Ullrich
      • Re: Descriptions, Presuppositions, Liar,..., Newberry
      • Re: Descriptions, Presuppositions, Liar,..., Jesse F. Hughes
      • Re: Descriptions, Presuppositions, Liar,..., Newberry
      • Re: Descriptions, Presuppositions, Liar,..., Jesse F. Hughes
      • Re: Descriptions, Presuppositions, Liar,..., David C . Ullrich
      • Re: Descriptions, Presuppositions, Liar,..., David C . Ullrich
      • Re: Descriptions, Presuppositions, Liar,..., Jesse F. Hughes
      • Re: Descriptions, Presuppositions, Liar,..., Newberry
      • Re: Descriptions, Presuppositions, Liar,..., Jesse F. Hughes
      • Re: Descriptions, Presuppositions, Liar,..., Newberry
      • Re: Descriptions, Presuppositions, Liar,..., Jesse F. Hughes
      • Re: Descriptions, Presuppositions, Liar,..., Newberry
      • Re: Descriptions, Presuppositions, Liar,..., Newberry
      • Re: Descriptions, Presuppositions, Liar,..., Jesse F. Hughes
      • Re: Descriptions, Presuppositions, Liar,..., Newberry
      • Re: Descriptions, Presuppositions, Liar,..., Newberry
      • Re: Descriptions, Presuppositions, Liar,..., Newberry
      • Re: Descriptions, Presuppositions, Liar,..., Aatu Koskensilta
  • Re: Descriptions, Presuppositions, Liar..., Jesse F. Hughes
    • Re: Descriptions, Presuppositions, Liar..., Newberry
      • Re: Descriptions, Presuppositions, Liar..., Jesse F. Hughes
      • Re: Descriptions, Presuppositions, Liar..., Newberry
      • Re: Descriptions, Presuppositions, Liar..., Aatu Koskensilta
      • Re: Descriptions, Presuppositions, Liar..., Newberry
      • Re: Descriptions, Presuppositions, Liar..., Jesse F. Hughes
      • Re: Descriptions, Presuppositions, Liar..., Newberry
      • Re: Descriptions, Presuppositions, Liar..., Jesse F. Hughes
      • Re: Descriptions, Presuppositions, Liar..., Newberry
      • Re: Descriptions, Presuppositions, Liar..., Jesse F. Hughes
      • Re: Descriptions, Presuppositions, Liar..., Newberry
      • Re: Descriptions, Presuppositions, Liar..., Jesse F. Hughes
      • Re: Descriptions, Presuppositions, Liar..., Newberry
      • Re: Descriptions, Presuppositions, Liar..., Jesse F. Hughes
      • Re: Descriptions, Presuppositions, Liar..., Newberry
      • Re: Descriptions, Presuppositions, Liar..., Jesse F. Hughes
      • Re: Descriptions, Presuppositions, Liar..., Newberry
      • Re: Descriptions, Presuppositions, Liar..., Jesse F. Hughes
      • Re: Descriptions, Presuppositions, Liar..., Newberry
      • Re: Descriptions, Presuppositions, Liar..., Jesse F. Hughes
      • Re: Descriptions, Presuppositions, Liar..., Newberry
      • Re: Descriptions, Presuppositions, Liar..., Jesse F. Hughes
      • Re: Descriptions, Presuppositions, Liar..., Newberry
      • Re: Descriptions, Presuppositions, Liar..., Jesse F. Hughes
      • Re: Descriptions, Presuppositions, Liar..., David C . Ullrich
      • Re: Descriptions, Presuppositions, Liar..., Newberry
      • Re: Descriptions, Presuppositions, Liar..., David C . Ullrich
      • Re: Descriptions, Presuppositions, Liar..., Newberry
      • Re: Descriptions, Presuppositions, Liar..., Daryl McCullough
      • Re: Descriptions, Presuppositions, Liar..., Jesse F. Hughes
      • Re: Descriptions, Presuppositions, Liar..., Newberry
      • Re: Descriptions, Presuppositions, Liar..., Daryl McCullough
      • Re: Descriptions, Presuppositions, Liar..., Newberry
      • Re: Descriptions, Presuppositions, Liar..., Newberry
      • Re: Descriptions, Presuppositions, Liar..., David C . Ullrich
      • Re: Descriptions, Presuppositions, Liar..., Jesse F. Hughes
      • Re: Descriptions, Presuppositions, Liar..., Newberry
      • Re: Descriptions, Presuppositions, Liar..., Newberry
      • Re: Descriptions, Presuppositions, Liar..., Jesse F. Hughes
      • Re: Descriptions, Presuppositions, Liar..., Newberry
      • Re: Descriptions, Presuppositions, Liar..., Jesse F. Hughes
      • Re: Descriptions, Presuppositions, Liar..., Newberry
      • Re: Descriptions, Presuppositions, Liar..., Jesse F. Hughes
      • Re: Descriptions, Presuppositions, Liar..., Newberry
      • Re: Descriptions, Presuppositions, Liar..., Jesse F. Hughes
      • Re: Descriptions, Presuppositions, Liar..., David C . Ullrich
      • Re: Descriptions, Presuppositions, Liar..., Jesse F. Hughes
      • Re: Descriptions, Presuppositions, Liar..., David C . Ullrich
      • Re: Descriptions, Presuppositions, Liar..., Newberry
      • Re: Descriptions, Presuppositions, Liar..., David C . Ullrich
      • Re: Descriptions, Presuppositions, Liar..., Newberry
      • Re: Descriptions, Presuppositions, Liar..., David C . Ullrich
  • Re: Descriptions, Presuppositions, Liar, Gödel, Charlie-Boo
• help with the proof please....., hank
• why nobody is reporting this moron aol user John Jones abusing google Injection-Info: b75g2000hsg.googlegroups.com; posting-host=195.93.21.98; why nobody is reporting this moron aol user John Jones abusing google Injection-Info: b75g2000hsg.googlegroups.com; posting-host=195.93.21.98;, OxFF
• Big O equation verification help, KevinZzz
• John Jones, DOS attacker, Stop jamming Google newsreader with the malicious subject lines, Sue...
• Win 50K INR- Participate in InfoQuiz 2007, maverick
• A proof showing 3=2??? I can't seem to find a flaw..., NUPUL
  • Re: A proof showing 3=2??? I can't seem to find a flaw..., Virgil
• Re: Anybody read and understood A. Garciadiego, BERTRAND RUSSELL AND THE ORIGINS OF THE SET-THEORETIC PARADOXES ?, philneo2001
  • Re: Anybody read and understood A. Garciadiego, BERTRAND RUSSELL AND THE ORIGINS OF THE SET-THEORETIC PARADOXES ?, Aatu Koskensilta
    • Re: Anybody read and understood A. Garciadiego, BERTRAND RUSSELL AND THE ORIGINS OF THE SET-THEORETIC PARADOXES ?, translogi
      • Re: Anybody read and understood A. Garciadiego, BERTRAND RUSSELL AND THE ORIGINS OF THE SET-THEORETIC PARADOXES ?, philneo2001
• Quantum Propositions as Subspaces. Why?, LauLuna
  • Re: Quantum Propositions as Subspaces. Why?, Pierre Asselin
  • Re: Quantum Propositions as Subspaces. Why?, Keith Ramsay
  • Re: Quantum Propositions as Subspaces. Why?, Daryl McCullough
    • Re: Quantum Propositions as Subspaces. Why?, LauLuna
  • Re: Quantum Propositions as Subspaces. Why?, Ken Pledger
  • Re: Quantum Propositions as Subspaces. Why?, galathaea
• Godel Was No Aristotle, raydpratt
  • Re: Godel Was No Aristotle, Aatu Koskensilta
    • Re: Godel Was No Aristotle, raydpratt
      • Re: Godel Was No Aristotle, Aatu Koskensilta
      • Re: Godel Was No Aristotle, Charlie-Boo
      • Re: Godel Was No Aristotle, Charlie-Boo
      • Re: Godel Was No Aristotle, Aatu Koskensilta
      • Re: Godel Was No Aristotle, Charlie-Boo
      • Re: Godel Was No Aristotle, philneo2001
      • Re: Godel Was No Aristotle, Aatu Koskensilta
      • Re: Godel Was No Aristotle, Daryl McCullough
      • Re: Godel Was No Aristotle, Charlie-Boo
      • Re: Godel Was No Aristotle, Daryl McCullough
      • Re: Godel Was No Aristotle, Charlie-Boo
      • Re: Godel Was No Aristotle, sanderbruggink
      • Re: Godel Was No Aristotle, Charlie-Boo
      • Re: Godel Was No Aristotle, TXLogic
      • Re: Godel Was No Aristotle, sanderbruggink
      • Re: Godel Was No Aristotle, Charlie-Boo
  • Re: Godel Was No Aristotle, Newberry
• Contradiction or paradox, translogi
  • Re: Contradiction or paradox, Aatu Koskensilta
    • Re: Contradiction or paradox, Arturo Magidin
      • Re: Contradiction or paradox, Aatu Koskensilta
    • Re: Contradiction or paradox, Charlie-Boo
  • Re: Contradiction or paradox, G . Frege
    • Re: Contradiction or paradox, LauLuna
      • Re: Contradiction or paradox, G . Frege
      • Re: Contradiction or paradox, Charlie-Boo
      • Re: Contradiction or paradox, Charlie-Boo
      • Re: Contradiction or paradox, translogi
      • Re: Contradiction or paradox, philneo2001
      • Re: Contradiction or paradox, Charlie-Boo
      • Re: Contradiction or paradox, Fuckwit
      • Re: Contradiction or paradox, G . Frege
      • Re: Contradiction or paradox, G . Frege
      • Re: Contradiction or paradox, translogi
      • Re: Contradiction or paradox, G . Frege
      • Re: Contradiction or paradox, translogi
    • Re: Contradiction or paradox, Charlie-Boo
• first order number theory, Lax
• An exercise in set theory: How high do we get by autonomously iterating the powerset operation?, Aatu Koskensilta
• formal sys question, zxcv_890
  • Re: formal sys question, Aatu Koskensilta
    • Re: formal sys question, zxcv_890
      • Re: formal sys question, Aatu Koskensilta
      • Re: formal sys question, Mitch
      • Re: formal sys question, zxcv_890
      • Re: formal sys question, Mitch
• Are You a Solar-Powered Parasite?, Indoarsman
  • Re: Are You a Solar-Powered Parasite?, c-winer
• Phool's unnatural system, george
• WILL SOMEONE AT SCI.LOGIC PLEASE INSTRUCT MR. JOHN JONES ON USENET ETIQUETTE, ESP. HOW TO USE KILLFILES. JOHN - READ THE USENET FAQ BEFORE MESSING AROUND WITH THREAD TITLES IN NEWSGROUPS YOU YOURSELF DO NOT READ., JanPB
  • Re: WILL SOMEONE AT SCI.LOGIC PLEASE INSTRUCT MR. JOHN JONES ON USENET ETIQUETTE, ESP. HOW TO USE KILLFILES. JOHN - READ THE USENET FAQ BEFORE MESSING AROUND WITH THREAD TITLES IN NEWSGROUPS YOU YOURSELF DO NOT READ., John Jones
    • Re: WILL SOMEONE AT SCI.LOGIC PLEASE INSTRUCT MR. JOHN JONES ON USENET ETIQUETTE, ESP. HOW TO USE KILLFILES. JOHN - READ THE USENET FAQ BEFORE MESSING AROUND WITH THREAD TITLES IN NEWSGROUPS YOU YOURSELF DO NOT READ., Alan Smaill
• How to solve this equation?, davidmill9000
  • Re: How to solve this equation?, translogi
  • Re: How to solve this equation?, J. Burse
• Logic and Visual Information, translogi
• Modallogic(s?) question., translogi
  • Re: Modallogic(s?) question., G . Frege
    • Re: Modallogic(s?) question., Jesse F. Hughes
  • Re: Modallogic(s?) question., Ken Pledger
  • Re: Modallogic(s?) question., J. Burse
• Re: JOHN JONES - STOP FLOODING SCI.PHYSICS.RELATIVITY YOU STOOPID ASS, balcon
• Re: JOHN JONES - STOP FLOODING SCI.PHYSICS.RELATIVITY YOU STOOPID ASS ==== Re: JOHN JONES - STOP FLOODING SCI.PHYSICS.RELATIVITY YOU STOOPID ASS ====, balcon
  • ., John Jones
• Re: PENTHO NO-MATES VALEY STOP CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING, balcon
• independence proofs in ZF, guyontheinet
  • Re: independence proofs in ZF, Aatu Koskensilta
  • Re: independence proofs in ZF, J. Burse
• Phil's Phinal explanation, george
  • Re: Phil's Phinal explanation, Phil
    • Re: Phil's Phinal explanation, george
• Infinite rules, bluelabel
  • Re: Infinite rules, Peter Webb
    • Re: Infinite rules, bluelabel
• Caused the publication of the principa Mathematica an paradigm shift?, translogi
• Re: No empty set theory 'NE', G . Frege
• four theorems on four levels, daniel
• the humorous Plus Transform, daniel
• Couting Problem perhaps, chickenlove
  • Re: Couting Problem perhaps, Barb Knox
• looking for a coauhtor, akandel
• Re: sci.logic are gays Re: Pentho Valley you TWAT STOP CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI, The Ghost In The Machine
• NAFL vs. FOL, george
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • NAFL vs. FOL, george
• Easter 2007- Flashes of Light on the Faith, Acrux
• food-biotechnology, deepi
• JOB: Mathematician/contractor, audio . magician
• Re: Pentho Valley STOP CROSSOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI, schoenfeld . one
• Re: Pentho Valley STOP CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI, schoenfeld . one
• Pentho Valley CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI, schoenfeld . one
• Triclass Theory:Exposition., zuhair
• Normal Modal Systems, Khodaeifar
  • Re: Normal Modal Systems, Chris Menzel
    • Re: Normal Modal Systems, Khodaeifar
      • Message not available
      • Re: Normal Modal Systems, Khodaeifar
  • Re: Normal Modal Systems, Ken Pledger
    • Re: Normal Modal Systems, Khodaeifar
• ., John Jones
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • ., John Jones
  • ., John Jones
  • ., John Jones
  • ., John Jones
  • ., John Jones
  • ., John Jones
  • ., John Jones
  • ., John Jones
  • ., John Jones
  • ., John Jones
  • ., John Jones
  • ., John Jones
    • Re: ., MKS
  • ., John Jones
  • ., John Jones
  • ., John Jones
  • ., John Jones
  • ., John Jones
  • ., John Jones
  • ., John Jones
  • ., John Jones
  • ., John Jones
  • ., John Jones
  • ., John Jones
  • ., John Jones
  • ., John Jones
  • ., John Jones
  • ., John Jones
• Re: Pentho Valley STOP CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI, knockitoffjackass
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Pentho Valley STOP CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI, knockitoffjackass
    • Re: Pentho Valley STOP CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI, schoenfeld . one
  • Re: Pentho Valley STOP CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI, knockitoffjackass
  • Re: Pentho Valley STOP CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI, knockitoffjackass
  • Re: Pentho Valley STOP CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI, schoenfeld . one
  • Re: Pentho Valley STOP CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI, schoenfeld . one
  • Re: Pentho Valley STOP CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI, schoenfeld . one
  • Re: Pentho Valley STOP CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI, schoenfeld . one
  • Re: Pentho Valley STOP CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI, John Jones
    • Re: Pentho Valley STOP CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI, schoenfeld . one
  • Re: Pentho Valley STOP CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI, schoenfeld . one
  • Re: Pentho Valley STOP CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI, schoenfeld . one
  • Re: Pentho Valley STOP CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI LOGIC CROSSPOSTING TO SCI, schoenfeld . one
• hi, bahar . bahary2007
• tanx, lucifer
• Winner of Fields for Logic dies: posted by Akhila Raman, akhila raman
• Kruskal and Prim with negative and positive weigths (proof), scuffio
• Re: Omega, apoorv
  • Re: Omega, Jesse F. Hughes
  • Re: Omega, MoeBlee
    • Re: Omega, apoorv
• Re: Triclass Theory, zuhair
  • Re: Triclass Theory, zuhair
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Triclass Theory, zuhair
    • Re: Triclass Theory, MoeBlee
• Definability question about FO, un student
  • Re: Definability question about FO, Peter_Smith
    • Re: Definability question about FO, un student
      • Re: Definability question about FO, Peter_Smith
      • Re: Definability question about FO, un student
    • Re: Definability question about FO, un student
  • Re: Definability question about FO, Jan Burse
    • Re: Definability question about FO, Jan Burse
      • Re: Definability question about FO, un student
  • Re: Definability question about FO, Robert E. Beaudoin
    • Re: Definability question about FO, un student
• E! quantification and equivalence, un student
  • Re: E! quantification and equivalence, mordov
    • Re: E! quantification and equivalence, Peter_Smith
      • Re: E! quantification and equivalence, mordov
      • Re: E! quantification and equivalence, Peter_Smith
      • Re: E! quantification and equivalence, un student
  • Re: E! quantification and equivalence, Owen
    • Re: E! quantification and equivalence, Jan Burse
      • Re: E! quantification and equivalence, Owen
      • Re: E! quantification and equivalence, G . Frege
    • Re: E! quantification and equivalence, translogi
      • Re: E! quantification and equivalence, Owen
      • Re: E! quantification and equivalence, translogi
      • Re: E! quantification and equivalence, G . Frege
      • Re: E! quantification and equivalence, translogi
      • Re: E! quantification and equivalence, Aatu Koskensilta
      • Re: E! quantification and equivalence, G . Frege
• Re: Solution to Liar Paradox, Charlie-Boo
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Solution to Liar Paradox, Charlie-Boo
    • Re: Solution to Liar Paradox, MoeBlee
      • Re: Solution to Liar Paradox, Charlie-Boo
      • Re: Solution to Liar Paradox, Jesse F. Hughes
      • Re: Solution to Liar Paradox, Charlie-Boo
      • Re: Solution to Liar Paradox, Jesse F. Hughes
      • Re: Solution to Liar Paradox, Charlie-Boo
      • Re: Solution to Liar Paradox, Jesse F. Hughes
      • Re: Solution to Liar Paradox, Charlie-Boo
      • Re: Solution to Liar Paradox, MoeBlee
      • Re: Solution to Liar Paradox, Charlie-Boo
  • Re: Solution to Liar Paradox, Charlie-Boo
    • Re: Solution to Liar Paradox, Newberry
      • Re: Solution to Liar Paradox, Charlie-Boo
      • Re: Solution to Liar Paradox, Newberry
      • Re: Solution to Liar Paradox, Charlie-Boo
      • Re: Solution to Liar Paradox, Newberry
  • Re: Solution to Liar Paradox, Charlie-Boo
  • Re: Solution to Liar Paradox, Charlie-Boo
  • Re: Solution to Liar Paradox, Charlie-Boo
  • Re: Solution to Liar Paradox, Charlie-Boo
  • Re: Solution to Liar Paradox, Charlie-Boo
  • Re: Solution to Liar Paradox, Charlie-Boo
  • Re: Solution to Liar Paradox, Charlie-Boo
  • Re: Solution to Liar Paradox, Charlie-Boo
  • Re: Solution to Liar Paradox, Charlie-Boo
  • Re: Solution to Liar Paradox, Newberry
    • Re: Solution to Liar Paradox, Charlie-Boo
    • Re: Solution to Liar Paradox, Charlie-Boo
• Re: Request for Direction in demonstrating powersets., Charlie-Boo
  • Re: Request for Direction in demonstrating powersets., David C . Ullrich
    • Re: Request for Direction in demonstrating powersets., Charlie-Boo
      • Re: Request for Direction in demonstrating powersets., MoeBlee
      • Re: Request for Direction in demonstrating powersets., Charlie-Boo
      • Re: Request for Direction in demonstrating powersets., MoeBlee
      • Re: Request for Direction in demonstrating powersets., Charlie-Boo
      • Re: Request for Direction in demonstrating powersets., Virgil
      • Re: Request for Direction in demonstrating powersets., MoeBlee
      • Re: Request for Direction in demonstrating powersets., David C . Ullrich
      • Re: Request for Direction in demonstrating powersets., Charlie-Boo
  • Re: Request for Direction in demonstrating powersets., MoeBlee
    • Re: Request for Direction in demonstrating powersets., Charlie-Boo
      • Re: Request for Direction in demonstrating powersets., MoeBlee
      • Re: Request for Direction in demonstrating powersets., Charlie-Boo
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Request for Direction in demonstrating powersets., Scott
  • Re: Request for Direction in demonstrating powersets., Charlie-Boo
    • Re: Request for Direction in demonstrating powersets., MoeBlee
      • Re: Request for Direction in demonstrating powersets., Charlie-Boo
      • Re: Request for Direction in demonstrating powersets., MoeBlee
      • Re: Request for Direction in demonstrating powersets., Charlie-Boo
  • Re: Request for Direction in demonstrating powersets., Jan Burse
• [FAQ, 06/11/05] Mathematical logic on the web, Boris 'pi' Piwinger
• Re: infinitely many nn's = infinite nn's?, Phil
  • Re: infinitely many nn's = infinite nn's?, The Ghost In The Machine
    • Re: infinitely many nn's = infinite nn's?, Phil
      • Re: infinitely many nn's = infinite nn's?, george
      • Re: infinitely many nn's = infinite nn's?, The Ghost In The Machine
      • Re: infinitely many nn's = infinite nn's?, Phil
      • Re: infinitely many nn's = infinite nn's?, MoeBlee
      • Re: infinitely many nn's = infinite nn's?, Phil
      • Re: infinitely many nn's = infinite nn's?, george
      • Re: infinitely many nn's = infinite nn's?, The Ghost In The Machine
      • Re: infinitely many nn's = infinite nn's?, Phil
      • Re: infinitely many nn's = infinite nn's?, MoeBlee
      • Re: infinitely many nn's = infinite nn's?, The Ghost In The Machine
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: infinitely many nn's = infinite nn's?, george
      • Re: infinitely many nn's = infinite nn's?, Phil
      • Re: infinitely many nn's = infinite nn's?, The Ghost In The Machine
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: infinitely many nn's = infinite nn's?, george
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • a Phool's argument, george
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: infinitely many nn's = infinite nn's?, george
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: infinitely many nn's = infinite nn's?, george
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: infinitely many nn's = infinite nn's?, george
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: infinitely many nn's = infinite nn's?, george
      • Re: infinitely many nn's = infinite nn's?, G . Frege
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • "the" model in question, george
      • Re: "the" model in question, G . Frege
      • Re: "the" model in question, Phil
      • Re: "the" model in question, george
      • a Phool's premsises, george
      • Re: "the" model in question, george
      • Re: "the" model in question, herbzet
      • Re: "the" model in question, herbzet
      • Re: "the" model in question, herbzet
      • Re: "the" model in question, herbzet
      • Phool's Phuture Prooph, george
      • Re: Phool's Phuture Prooph, G . Frege
      • Re: "the" model in question, MoeBlee
      • Re: "the" model in question, Phil
      • Re: "the" model in question, MoeBlee
      • Re: infinitely many nn's = infinite nn's?, Phil
      • Re: infinitely many nn's = infinite nn's?, george
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: infinitely many nn's = infinite nn's?, Phil
      • Re: infinitely many nn's = infinite nn's?, The Ghost In The Machine
      • Re: infinitely many nn's = infinite nn's?, Phil
      • Re: infinitely many nn's = infinite nn's?, The Ghost In The Machine
      • Message not available
      • Re: More natural numbers, un student
      • Re: More natural numbers, Phil
      • Re: More natural numbers, un student
      • Re: More natural numbers, Phil
      • Re: More natural numbers, un student
      • Re: More natural numbers, Phil
      • Re: More natural numbers, un student
      • Re: More natural numbers, Virgil
      • Re: More natural numbers, Phil
      • Re: More natural numbers, The Ghost In The Machine
      • Re: More natural numbers, Virgil
      • Re: More natural numbers, Virgil
      • Message not available
      • Re: More natural numbers, Daryl McCullough
      • Re: More natural numbers, Phil
      • Re: More natural numbers, un student
      • Re: More natural numbers, Daryl McCullough
      • Re: More natural numbers, george
      • Re: More natural numbers, Virgil
      • Re: More natural numbers, MoeBlee
      • Re: More natural numbers, Virgil
      • Re: More natural numbers, MoeBlee
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: More natural numbers, george
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Phil phLIES again, george
      • Re: Phil phLIES again, Phil
      • Re: Phil phLIES again, george
      • effects of the axiom of induction, george
      • Re: effects of the axiom of induction, Phil
      • Re: effects of the axiom of induction, G . Frege
      • Re: effects of the axiom of induction, george
      • Re: effects of the axiom of induction, G . Frege
      • Re: effects of the axiom of induction, G . Frege
      • Re: effects of the axiom of induction, george
      • Message not available
      • Re: effects of the axiom of induction, george
      • Message not available
      • Re: effects of the axiom of induction, george
      • Message not available
      • Re: effects of the axiom of induction, george
      • Re: effects of the axiom of induction, Phil
      • Message not available
      • Re: effects of the axiom of induction, george
      • Message not available
      • Re: effects of the axiom of induction, george
      • Message not available
      • Re: effects of the axiom of induction, george
      • Message not available
      • Re: effects of the axiom of induction, george
      • Message not available
      • Re: effects of the axiom of induction, george
      • Message not available
      • Re: effects of the axiom of induction, george
      • Message not available
      • Re: effects of the axiom of induction, karl malbrain
      • Re: effects of the axiom of induction, george
      • Re: effects of the axiom of induction, george
      • Re: effects of the axiom of induction, G . Frege
      • Re: effects of the axiom of induction, Phil
      • Re: effects of the axiom of induction, george
      • Re: effects of the axiom of induction, george
      • Re: effects of the axiom of induction, george
      • Phool's Shipht Error, george
      • Re: effects of the axiom of induction, Virgil
      • Re: effects of the axiom of induction, george
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Phool resurrects the "lips" ordering, george
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: More natural numbers, Virgil
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: More natural numbers, G . Frege
      • Message not available
      • Re: More natural numbers, george
      • Message not available
      • Re: More natural numbers, george
      • Re: More natural numbers, Phil
      • Re: More natural numbers, george
      • Re: More natural numbers, george
      • Re: More natural numbers, george
      • Re: More natural numbers, Virgil
      • Message not available
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, G . Frege
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, Phil
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, Jesse F. Hughes
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, Phil
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, Jesse F. Hughes
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, Phil
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, G . Frege
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, Jesse F. Hughes
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, Phil
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, Jesse F. Hughes
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, G . Frege
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, Phil
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, Jesse F. Hughes
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, Virgil
      • Message not available
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, Jesse F. Hughes
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, Phil
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, MoeBlee
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, george
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, george
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, Phil
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, george
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, george
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, george
      • how to phrase proofs, george
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, george
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, Phil
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, george
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, Phil
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, george
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, george
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, Phil
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, Jesse F. Hughes
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, george
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, Phil
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, george
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, Jesse F. Hughes
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, Aatu Koskensilta
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, Phil
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, Jesse F. Hughes
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, george
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, Jesse F. Hughes
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, george
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, Jesse F. Hughes
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, george
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, george
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, Phil
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, Phil
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, george
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, G . Frege
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, george
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, Jesse F. Hughes
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, G . Frege
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, george
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, george
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, Virgil
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, Jesse F. Hughes
      • Message not available
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, Jesse F. Hughes
      • Message not available
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, karl malbrain
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, karl malbrain
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, george
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, Jesse F. Hughes
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, MoeBlee
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, Phil
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, MoeBlee
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, Phil
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, Virgil
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, MoeBlee
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, george
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, MoeBlee
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, Phil
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, Phil
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, george
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, Jesse F. Hughes
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, george
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, Jesse F. Hughes
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, Phil
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, MoeBlee
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, Phil
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, MoeBlee
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, Phil
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, G . Frege
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, G . Frege
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, karl malbrain
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, karl malbrain
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, george
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, Phil
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, george
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, george
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, george
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, george
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, george
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, george
      • One moment in time, george
      • Re: One moment in time, Phil
      • Re: One moment in time, george
      • Re: One moment in time, karl malbrain
      • Re: One moment in time, Jesse F. Hughes
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, karl malbrain
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, MoeBlee
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, Phil
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, george
      • Message not available
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, David C . Ullrich
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, Aatu Koskensilta
      • Message not available
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, Aatu Koskensilta
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, MoeBlee
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, Phil
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, Phil
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, MoeBlee
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, george
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, James Burns
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, george
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, James Burns
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, george
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, James Burns
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, george
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, george
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, george
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, MoeBlee
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, MoeBlee
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, george
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, MoeBlee
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, TXLogic
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, MoeBlee
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, TXLogic
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, MoeBlee
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, G . Frege
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, george
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, Phil
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, george
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, Phil
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, Virgil
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, george
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Two STILL UNANSWERED questions, Phil
      • Re: Two STILL UNANSWERED questions, george
      • Re: Two STILL UNANSWERED questions, Virgil
      • Re: Two STILL UNANSWERED questions, Phil
      • Re: Two STILL UNANSWERED questions, george
      • Re: Two STILL UNANSWERED questions, Phil
      • Re: Two STILL UNANSWERED questions, Karl Malbrain
      • Re: Two STILL UNANSWERED questions, karl malbrain
      • Re: Two STILL UNANSWERED questions, Virgil
      • Re: Two STILL UNANSWERED questions, karl malbrain
      • Re: Two STILL UNANSWERED questions, george
      • Message not available
      • limit for natural numbers, george
      • Message not available
      • in keeping with current set theory, george
      • Message not available
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, karl malbrain
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, Aatu Koskensilta
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, karl malbrain
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, george
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, george
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, Phil
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, george
      • prior-definition-of-language as a "premise", george
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, george
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, george
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, karl malbrain
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, Jesse F. Hughes
      • Phil vs. Galileo's Paradox, george
      • Re: Phil vs. Galileo's Paradox, Phil
      • Re: Phil vs. Galileo's Paradox, george
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, george
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, G . Frege
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, george
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, georgie
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, Virgil
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, georgie
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, Phil
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, Jesse F. Hughes
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, G . Frege
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, Phil
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, karl malbrain
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, G . Frege
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, G . Frege
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, G . Frege
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, LauLuna
      • Message not available
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, MoeBlee
      • Message not available
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, herbzet
      • Re: infinitely many nn's = infinite nn's?, george
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: infinitely many nn's = infinite nn's?, george
      • Re: infinitely many nn's = infinite nn's?, Phil
  • Re: infinitely many nn's = infinite nn's?, george
    • Re: infinitely many nn's = infinite nn's?, G . Frege
      • Re: infinitely many nn's = infinite nn's?, Phil
      • Re: infinitely many nn's = infinite nn's?, george
      • Re: infinitely many nn's = infinite nn's?, george
      • Re: infinitely many nn's = infinite nn's?, Phil
      • Re: infinitely many nn's = infinite nn's?, MoeBlee
      • Re: infinitely many nn's = infinite nn's?, george
      • Re: infinitely many nn's = infinite nn's?, Phil
      • Re: infinitely many nn's = infinite nn's?, Phil
      • Re: infinitely many nn's = infinite nn's?, MoeBlee
      • Re: infinitely many nn's = infinite nn's?, Aatu Koskensilta
      • Re: infinitely many nn's = infinite nn's?, george
      • Re: infinitely many nn's = infinite nn's?, Phil
      • Re: infinitely many nn's = infinite nn's?, MoeBlee
      • Re: infinitely many nn's = infinite nn's?, Phil
      • Re: infinitely many nn's = infinite nn's?, MoeBlee
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: infinitely many nn's = infinite nn's?, Jesse F. Hughes
    • Re: infinitely many nn's = infinite nn's?, Phil
      • Re: infinitely many nn's = infinite nn's?, george
      • Re: infinitely many nn's = infinite nn's?, G . Frege
      • Re: infinitely many nn's = infinite nn's?, The Ghost In The Machine
      • Re: infinitely many nn's = infinite nn's?, Jesse F. Hughes
      • Re: infinitely many nn's = infinite nn's?, Jesse F. Hughes
  • Re: infinitely many nn's = infinite nn's?, george
    • Re: infinitely many nn's = infinite nn's?, Phil
  • Re: infinitely many nn's = infinite nn's?, george
  • Re: infinitely many nn's = infinite nn's?, george
  • Re: infinitely many nn's = infinite nn's?, george
  • Re: infinitely many nn's = infinite nn's?, george
  • Re: infinitely many nn's = infinite nn's?, Aatu Koskensilta
    • Re: infinitely many nn's = infinite nn's?, Phil
      • Re: infinitely many nn's = infinite nn's?, Aatu Koskensilta
    • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: infinitely many nn's = infinite nn's?, G . Frege
      • Re: infinitely many nn's = infinite nn's?, G . Frege
      • Re: infinitely many nn's = infinite nn's?, Phil
      • Re: infinitely many nn's = infinite nn's?, george
      • Re: infinitely many nn's = infinite nn's?, G . Frege
    • Message not available
      • Re: infinitely many nn's = infinite nn's?, Aatu Koskensilta
      • Re: infinitely many nn's = infinite nn's?, un student
      • Re: infinitely many nn's = infinite nn's?, Aatu Koskensilta
      • doubters (was, Re: infinitely many nn's = infinite nn's?), Lee Rudolph
      • Re: doubters (was, Re: infinitely many nn's = infinite nn's?), Aatu Koskensilta
      • Re: infinitely many nn's = infinite nn's?, un student
      • Re: infinitely many nn's = infinite nn's?, george
      • Re: infinitely many nn's = infinite nn's?, un student
      • Re: infinitely many nn's = infinite nn's?, george
      • Re: infinitely many nn's = infinite nn's?, un student
      • Re: infinitely many nn's = infinite nn's?, Phil
      • Re: infinitely many nn's = infinite nn's?, george
      • Re: infinitely many nn's = infinite nn's?, Phil
      • Re: infinitely many nn's = infinite nn's?, Daryl McCullough
      • Re: infinitely many nn's = infinite nn's?, Aatu Koskensilta
      • Re: infinitely many nn's = infinite nn's?, Chris Menzel
      • Re: infinitely many nn's = infinite nn's?, MoeBlee
      • Re: infinitely many nn's = infinite nn's?, Jesse F. Hughes
  • Re: infinitely many nn's = infinite nn's?, MoeBlee
  • Re: infinitely many nn's = infinite nn's?, MoeBlee
    • Re: infinitely many nn's = infinite nn's?, Phil
      • Re: infinitely many nn's = infinite nn's?, MoeBlee
      • Message not available
      • Re: infinitely many nn's = infinite nn's?, Phil
      • Re: infinitely many nn's = infinite nn's?, R. Srinivasan
      • Re: infinitely many nn's = infinite nn's?, george
      • Re: infinitely many nn's = infinite nn's?, R. Srinivasan
      • Re: infinitely many nn's = infinite nn's?, george
      • Re: infinitely many nn's = infinite nn's?, R. Srinivasan
      • Re: infinitely many nn's = infinite nn's?, george
      • Re: infinitely many nn's = infinite nn's?, R. Srinivasan
      • Re: infinitely many nn's = infinite nn's?, george
      • Re: infinitely many nn's = infinite nn's?, R. Srinivasan
      • Re: infinitely many nn's = infinite nn's?, george
      • Re: infinitely many nn's = infinite nn's?, R. Srinivasan
      • FOL vs. NAFL, george
      • Re: FOL vs. NAFL, R. Srinivasan
      • Re: FOL vs. NAFL, george
      • Re: FOL vs. NAFL, george
      • Re: FOL vs. NAFL, R. Srinivasan
      • Re: FOL vs. NAFL, george
      • Re: FOL vs. NAFL, J. Burse
      • Re: FOL vs. NAFL, J. Burse
      • Re: infinitely many nn's = infinite nn's?, Barb Knox
      • Re: infinitely many nn's = infinite nn's?, Phil
      • Re: infinitely many nn's = infinite nn's?, george
      • Re: infinitely many nn's = infinite nn's?, george
      • Re: infinitely many nn's = infinite nn's?, G . Frege
      • Re: infinitely many nn's = infinite nn's?, george
      • Re: infinitely many nn's = infinite nn's?, george
      • Re: infinitely many nn's = infinite nn's?, george
  • Re: infinitely many nn's = infinite nn's?, George Dance
  • Re: infinitely many nn's = infinite nn's?, George Dance
    • Re: infinitely many nn's = infinite nn's?, Chris Menzel
      • Re: infinitely many nn's = infinite nn's?, Aatu Koskensilta
    • Re: infinitely many nn's = infinite nn's?, Aatu Koskensilta
      • Re: infinitely many nn's = infinite nn's?, George Dance
      • Re: infinitely many nn's = infinite nn's?, Aatu Koskensilta
  • Re: infinitely many nn's = infinite nn's?, Phil
    • Message not available
      • Re: infinitely many nn's = infinite nn's?, Jesse F. Hughes
    • Re: infinitely many nn's = infinite nn's?, MoeBlee

• Windows
• Science
• Usenet

• Archive
• About
• Privacy
• Search
• Imprint