sci.logic

• Date Index

---

• On the nature of implication, herbzet
• join the points., MasgiSomnath
  • Re: join the points., Peter_Smith
    • Re: join the points., Herman Jurjus
      • Re: join the points., Peter_Smith
• Newbie asks a logical question!, Jonathan
  • Re: Newbie asks a logical question!, Charlie-Boo
    • Re: Newbie asks a logical question!, Jonathan
• Linnebo's argument against unrestricted quantification, LauLuna
  • Re: Linnebo's argument against unrestricted quantification, G . Frege
    • Re: Linnebo's argument against unrestricted quantification, LauLuna
  • Re: Linnebo's argument against unrestricted quantification, Peter_Smith
  • Re: Linnebo's argument against unrestricted quantification, LauLuna
• yourdocumentsource janrom...@gmail.com Phony comments, Adam
• question, Rupert
  • Re: question, Rupert
    • Re: question, Keith Ramsay
• Answer "how to prove ~(P <--> Q) |- ~P <-->Q ", Conbra
  • Re: Answer "how to prove ~(P <--> Q) |- ~P <-->Q ", translogi
    • Re: Answer "how to prove ~(P <--> Q) |- ~P <-->Q ", Conbra
      • Re: Answer "how to prove ~(P <--> Q) |- ~P <-->Q ", Conbra
      • Re: Answer "how to prove ~(P <--> Q) |- ~P <-->Q ", Rupert
      • Re: Answer "how to prove ~(P <--> Q) |- ~P <-->Q ", Conbra
      • Re: Answer "how to prove ~(P <--> Q) |- ~P <-->Q ", Rupert
      • Re: Answer "how to prove ~(P <--> Q) |- ~P <-->Q ", Conbra
      • Re: Answer "how to prove ~(P <--> Q) |- ~P <-->Q ", Frederick Williams
  • Re: Answer "how to prove ~(P <--> Q) |- ~P <-->Q ", George Dance
    • Re: Answer "how to prove ~(P <--> Q) |- ~P <-->Q ", George Dance
      • Re: Answer "how to prove ~(P <--> Q) |- ~P <-->Q ", Conbra
    • Re: Answer "how to prove ~(P <--> Q) |- ~P <-->Q ", Frederick Williams
      • Re: Answer "how to prove ~(P <--> Q) |- ~P <-->Q ", George Dance
      • Re: Answer "how to prove ~(P <--> Q) |- ~P <-->Q ", G . Frege
      • Re: Answer "how to prove ~(P <--> Q) |- ~P <-->Q ", herbzet
    • Re: Answer "how to prove ~(P <--> Q) |- ~P <-->Q ", herbzet
      • Re: Answer "how to prove ~(P <--> Q) |- ~P <-->Q ", translogi
      • Re: Answer "how to prove ~(P <--> Q) |- ~P <-->Q ", Jesse F. Hughes
• Turing and Mathematics, Douglas Eagleson
  • Re: Turing and Mathematics, Charlie-Boo
    • Re: Turing and Mathematics, Douglas Eagleson
• Big bang theory solved., Peter_W
• Calculating Concepts in Contradiction on Concept Algebra, Conbra
• hyperbolic geometry, Rupert
  • Re: hyperbolic geometry, Keith Ramsay
    • Re: hyperbolic geometry, Rupert
      • Re: hyperbolic geometry, Keith Ramsay
      • Re: hyperbolic geometry, Rupert
    • Re: hyperbolic geometry, Rupert
      • Re: hyperbolic geometry, Rupert
• Formalizing the Fundamental Theorem of Arithmetic, mmweiss
  • Re: Formalizing the Fundamental Theorem of Arithmetic, G . Frege
    • Re: Formalizing the Fundamental Theorem of Arithmetic, Charlie-Boo
      • Re: Formalizing the Fundamental Theorem of Arithmetic, Jesse F. Hughes
      • Re: Formalizing the Fundamental Theorem of Arithmetic, Charlie-Boo
      • Re: Formalizing the Fundamental Theorem of Arithmetic, MoeBlee
      • Re: Formalizing the Fundamental Theorem of Arithmetic, Jesse F. Hughes
      • Re: Formalizing the Fundamental Theorem of Arithmetic, george
      • Re: Formalizing the Fundamental Theorem of Arithmetic, David C . Ullrich
      • Re: Formalizing the Fundamental Theorem of Arithmetic, Jesse F. Hughes
      • Re: Formalizing the Fundamental Theorem of Arithmetic, MoeBlee
  • Re: Formalizing the Fundamental Theorem of Arithmetic, Aatu Koskensilta
    • Re: Formalizing the Fundamental Theorem of Arithmetic, Rupert
    • Re: Formalizing the Fundamental Theorem of Arithmetic, george
      • Re: Formalizing the Fundamental Theorem of Arithmetic, Aatu Koskensilta
      • Re: Formalizing the Fundamental Theorem of Arithmetic, Charlie-Boo
• Subsets of cardinals in a well-ordering, Justin Palumbo
  • Re: Subsets of cardinals in a well-ordering, Robert Sheskey
• Call For Participation: WORLDCOMP'07: joint conferences in CS, CE, and applied computing, June 25-28, 2007, Las Vegas, A. M. G. Solo
• Re: The Truth of Truly True Truth, Jesse F. Hughes
• Re: Can We Quantify over Everything?, G . Frege
  • Re: Can We Quantify over Everything?, Peter_Smith
    • Re: Can We Quantify over Everything?, G . Frege
    • Re: Can We Quantify over Everything?, LauLuna
      • Re: Can We Quantify over Everything?, Peter_Smith
  • Re: Can We Quantify over Everything?, LauLuna
    • Re: Can We Quantify over Everything?, G . Frege
      • Re: Can We Quantify over Everything?, LauLuna
      • Re: Can We Quantify over Everything?, LauLuna
      • Re: Can We Quantify over Everything?, G . Frege
      • Re: Can We Quantify over Everything?, LauLuna
      • Re: Can We Quantify over Everything?, LauLuna
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Can We Quantify over Everything?, george
    • Re: Can We Quantify over Everything?, G . Frege
    • Re: Can We Quantify over Everything?, LauLuna
      • Re: Can We Quantify over Everything?, george
      • Re: Can We Quantify over Everything?, george
      • Re: Can We Quantify over Everything?, george
      • Re: Can We Quantify over Everything?, george
      • Re: Can We Quantify over Everything?, george
      • Re: Can We Quantify over Everything?, george
      • Re: Can We Quantify over Everything?, george
      • Re: Can We Quantify over Everything?, george
      • Re: Can We Quantify over Everything?, george
      • Re: Can We Quantify over Everything?, george
      • Re: Can We Quantify over Everything?, george
      • Re: Can We Quantify over Everything?, george
      • Re: Can We Quantify over Everything?, george
      • Re: Can We Quantify over Everything?, george
      • Re: Can We Quantify over Everything?, george
    • Re: Can We Quantify over Everything?, LauLuna
    • Re: Can We Quantify over Everything?, LauLuna
  • Re: Can We Quantify over Everything?, george
    • Re: Can We Quantify over Everything?, LauLuna
    • Re: Can We Quantify over Everything?, LauLuna
• Re: An exercise in set theory: How high do we get by autonomously iterating the powerset operation?, Peter Percival
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: An exercise in set theory: How high do we get by autonomously iterating the powerset operation?, Rupert
    • Re: An exercise in set theory: How high do we get by autonomously iterating the powerset operation?, Aatu Koskensilta
      • Re: An exercise in set theory: How high do we get by autonomously iterating the powerset operation?, Rupert
      • Re: An exercise in set theory: How high do we get by autonomously iterating the powerset operation?, Rupert
• Inductive Logic System and Machine Learning - Free White Paper, tommak
  • Re: Inductive Logic System and Machine Learning - Free White Paper, Charlie-Boo
• Logic, Turkish constitution and the latest political events, myg
• puzzeling with Smullyan's "forever Undecided", translogi
• Critics of Douglas Lenat's projects ???, mlck1900
  • Re: Critics of Douglas Lenat's projects ???, J. Burse
• Set theory with urelements and elementary particles, adib . jebara
• Re: Descriptions, Presuppositions, Liar, Gödel, Charlie-Boo
• Re: A proof showing 3=2??? I can't seem to find a flaw..., jbowen7
  • Re: A proof showing 3=2??? I can't seem to find a flaw..., Barb Knox
• Prize Announced for Determining the Boundaries of Turing Machine Computation, Wolfram Research
  • Re: Prize Announced for Determining the Boundaries of Turing Machine Computation, Douglas Eagleson
  • Re: Prize Announced for Determining the Boundaries of Turing Machine Computation, Charlie-Boo
    • Re: Prize Announced for Determining the Boundaries of Turing Machine Computation, Jesse F. Hughes
      • Re: Prize Announced for Determining the Boundaries of Turing Machine Computation, Charlie-Boo
      • Re: Prize Announced for Determining the Boundaries of Turing Machine Computation, Jesse F. Hughes
      • Re: Prize Announced for Determining the Boundaries of Turing Machine Computation, Charlie-Boo
      • Re: Prize Announced for Determining the Boundaries of Turing Machine Computation, Jesse F. Hughes
      • Re: Prize Announced for Determining the Boundaries of Turing Machine Computation, Charlie-Boo
      • Re: Prize Announced for Determining the Boundaries of Turing Machine Computation, Jesse F. Hughes
      • Re: Prize Announced for Determining the Boundaries of Turing Machine Computation, Charlie-Boo
      • Re: Prize Announced for Determining the Boundaries of Turing Machine Computation, Jesse F. Hughes
      • Re: Prize Announced for Determining the Boundaries of Turing Machine Computation, Charlie-Boo
      • Re: Prize Announced for Determining the Boundaries of Turing Machine Computation, Charlie-Boo
    • Re: Prize Announced for Determining the Boundaries of Turing Machine Computation, Charlie-Boo
  • Re: Prize Announced for Determining the Boundaries of Turing Machine Computation, george
    • Re: Prize Announced for Determining the Boundaries of Turing Machine Computation, Charlie-Boo
      • Re: Prize Announced for Determining the Boundaries of Turing Machine Computation, MoeBlee
      • Re: Prize Announced for Determining the Boundaries of Turing Machine Computation, Charlie-Boo
      • Re: Prize Announced for Determining the Boundaries of Turing Machine Computation, MoeBlee
      • Re: Prize Announced for Determining the Boundaries of Turing Machine Computation, Charlie-Boo
• A comment on everyday language... in a logic textbook, Michel . Coutourier
• The Definition of Points, markwh04
  • Re: The Definition of Points, LauLuna
    • Re: The Definition of Points, markwh04
• Can you solve this?, mine hub2
• Re: Skolem Paradox Question, george
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Skolem Paradox Question, george
• UHF RADIOS AND WALKIE TALKIES, ben.ajenoui@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: UHF RADIOS AND WALKIE TALKIES, Frederick Williams
• Is the online solution right, Ravi
• Modal logic example, Gboro54
  • Re: Modal logic example, Gboro54
  • Re: Modal logic example, Barb Knox
    • Re: Modal logic example, Jesse F. Hughes
      • Re: Modal logic example, Barb Knox
      • Re: Modal logic example, Jesse F. Hughes
      • Re: Modal logic example, Lee Rudolph
  • Re: Modal logic example, Peter_Smith
    • Re: Modal logic example, Gboro54
      • Re: Modal logic example, Jesse F. Hughes
      • Re: Modal logic example, Gboro54
      • Re: Modal logic example, Aatu Koskensilta
      • Re: Modal logic example, Jesse F. Hughes
      • Re: Modal logic example, Lee Rudolph
      • Re: Modal logic example, Aatu Koskensilta
      • Re: Modal logic example, TXLogic
  • Re: Modal logic example, galathaea
    • Re: Modal logic example, Gboro54
      • Re: Modal logic example, Jesse F. Hughes
      • Re: Modal logic example, J. Burse
      • Re: Modal logic example, J. Burse
  • Re: Modal logic example, Frederick Williams
• Beginner's question about NAFL, karl malbrain
• Grz, logicstudy
  • Re: Grz, Rupert
  • Re: Grz, logicstudy
    • Re: Grz, Frederick Williams
      • Re: Grz, Frederick Williams
      • Re: Grz, Aatu Koskensilta
      • Re: Grz, logicstudy
      • Re: Grz, Frederick Williams
• Re: #4 set-up of MAD Fleet; new book: "Mutually Assured Destruction (MAD) Fleet Saves the World from Nuclear Detonation and Radioactive Pollution", Jesse F. Hughes
  • Re: #4 set-up of MAD Fleet; new book: "Mutually Assured Destruction (MAD) Fleet Saves the World from Nuclear Detonation and Radioactive Pollution", a_plutonium
    • Re: #4 set-up of MAD Fleet; new book: "Mutually Assured Destruction (MAD) Fleet Saves the World from Nuclear Detonation and Radioactive Pollution", Jesse F. Hughes
• Theoretical CS Search Engine, gphilip . newsgroups
• MBA in Telecommunication Management (MPTM), mba.news@xxxxxxxxx
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • MBA in Telecommunication Management (MPTM), mba.news@xxxxxxxxx
  • MBA in Telecommunication Management (MPTM), mba.news@xxxxxxxxx
• MS Computer Science / Masters Program in Information Systems (MPIS), mba.news@xxxxxxxxx
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • MS Computer Science / Masters Program in Information Systems (MPIS), mba.news@xxxxxxxxx
  • MS Computer Science / Masters Program in Information Systems (MPIS), mba.news@xxxxxxxxx
• Phool nearly defines multiplication, george
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Phool nearly defines multiplication, george
• Phool nearly discovers equipollence, george
  • Re: Phool nearly discovers equipollence, Ross A. Finlayson
    • Re: Phool nearly discovers equipollence, J. Burse
      • Re: Phool nearly discovers equipollence, Ross A. Finlayson
      • Re: Phool nearly discovers equipollence, J. Burse
      • Re: Phool nearly discovers equipollence, george
  • Re: Phool nearly discovers equipollence, karl malbrain
    • Re: Phool nearly discovers equipollence, george
• pandaresearch, renduchintalavinay@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Shift-errors, recursive definitions, Phil
  • Re: Shift-errors, recursive definitions, Jesse F. Hughes
    • Re: Shift-errors, recursive definitions, Daryl McCullough
    • Re: Shift-errors, recursive definitions, karl malbrain
    • Re: Shift-errors, recursive definitions, karl malbrain
      • Re: Shift-errors, recursive definitions, george
      • Re: Shift-errors, recursive definitions, karl malbrain
      • Re: Shift-errors, recursive definitions, george
      • Re: Shift-errors, recursive definitions, Karl Malbrain
      • Re: Shift-errors, recursive definitions, Jesse F. Hughes
      • Re: Shift-errors, recursive definitions, Karl Malbrain
      • Re: Shift-errors, recursive definitions, Jesse F. Hughes
  • Re: Shift-errors, recursive definitions, karl malbrain
  • Re: Shift-errors, recursive definitions, karl malbrain
  • Re: Shift-errors, recursive definitions, karl malbrain
  • Re: Shift-errors, recursive definitions, karl malbrain
  • Re: Shift-errors, recursive definitions, karl malbrain
    • Re: Shift-errors, recursive definitions, philneo2001
      • Re: Shift-errors, recursive definitions, karl malbrain
      • Re: Shift-errors, recursive definitions, karl malbrain
      • Re: Shift-errors, recursive definitions, george
    • Re: Shift-errors, recursive definitions, philneo2001
  • Re: Shift-errors, recursive definitions, karl malbrain
  • Re: Shift-errors, recursive definitions, karl malbrain
  • Any 400-line message is Phoolish, george
  • Re: Shift-errors, recursive definitions, george
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Shift-errors, recursive definitions, george
• Re: Help with proof in Gentzen's system NK, Keith Ramsay
  • Re: Help with proof in Gentzen's system NK, Frederick Williams
    • Re: Help with proof in Gentzen's system NK, Keith Ramsay
      • Re: Help with proof in Gentzen's system NK, Frederick Williams
      • Re: Help with proof in Gentzen's system NK, Jöran Egdahl
      • Re: Help with proof in Gentzen's system NK, Jöran Egdahl
      • Re: Help with proof in Gentzen's system NK, Keith Ramsay
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Help with proof in Gentzen's system NK, Frederick Williams
    • Re: Help with proof in Gentzen's system NK, Alan Smaill
      • Re: Help with proof in Gentzen's system NK, Keith Ramsay
      • Re: Help with proof in Gentzen's system NK, Alan Smaill
• Mathematica/ Curvus Job Opportunity in the Philadelphia Area, Marcella . Barker
• Re: Anybody read and understood A. Garciadiego, BERTRAND RUSSELL AND THE ORIGINS OF THE SET-THEORETIC PARADOXES ?, philneo2001
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Anybody read and understood A. Garciadiego, BERTRAND RUSSELL AND THE ORIGINS OF THE SET-THEORETIC PARADOXES ?, galathaea
    • Re: Anybody read and understood A. Garciadiego, BERTRAND RUSSELL AND THE ORIGINS OF THE SET-THEORETIC PARADOXES ?, philneo2001
• Modal logic, xuqiuhua
  • Re: Modal logic, Frederick Williams
  • Re: Modal logic, BuddhaThu
• Nomenclature question, Colin
  • Re: Nomenclature question, Peter_Smith
  • Re: Nomenclature question, J. Burse
• Re: Anti-diagonalist page, Frederick Williams
• Re: Contradiction or paradox, Charlie-Boo
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Contradiction or paradox, Charlie-Boo
    • Re: Contradiction or paradox, William Hale
      • Re: Contradiction or paradox, Charlie-Boo
      • Re: Contradiction or paradox, William Hale
      • Re: Contradiction or paradox, Charlie-Boo
  • Re: Contradiction or paradox, Charlie-Boo
  • Re: Contradiction or paradox, Charlie-Boo
    • Re: Contradiction or paradox, translogi
      • Re: Contradiction or paradox, Charlie-Boo
      • Re: Contradiction or paradox, Jesse F. Hughes
      • Re: Contradiction or paradox, MoeBlee
      • Re: Contradiction or paradox, Charlie-Boo
      • Re: Contradiction or paradox, MoeBlee
      • Re: Contradiction or paradox, Charlie-Boo
      • Re: Contradiction or paradox, MoeBlee
      • Re: Contradiction or paradox, Charlie-Boo
      • Re: Contradiction or paradox, MoeBlee
      • Re: Contradiction or paradox, G . Frege
      • Re: Contradiction or paradox, Charlie-Boo
      • Re: Contradiction or paradox, TXLogic
      • Re: Contradiction or paradox, Charlie-Boo
      • Re: Contradiction or paradox, Charlie-Boo
      • Re: Contradiction or paradox, MoeBlee
      • Re: Contradiction or paradox, Charlie-Boo
      • Re: Contradiction or paradox, MoeBlee
      • Re: Contradiction or paradox, Charlie-Boo
      • Re: Contradiction or paradox, MoeBlee
      • Re: Contradiction or paradox, TXLogic
      • Re: Contradiction or paradox, Charlie-Boo
      • Re: Contradiction or paradox, MoeBlee
      • Re: Contradiction or paradox, Charlie-Boo
      • Re: Contradiction or paradox, Jesse F. Hughes
      • Re: Contradiction or paradox, Peter Percival
      • Re: Contradiction or paradox, Jesse F. Hughes
      • Re: Contradiction or paradox, Charlie-Boo
      • Re: Contradiction or paradox, MoeBlee
      • Re: Contradiction or paradox, Charlie-Boo
      • Re: Contradiction or paradox, MoeBlee
      • Re: Contradiction or paradox, Charlie-Boo
      • Re: Contradiction or paradox, MoeBlee
      • Re: Contradiction or paradox, Charlie-Boo
      • Re: Contradiction or paradox, MoeBlee
      • Re: Contradiction or paradox, Charlie-Boo
      • Re: Contradiction or paradox, MoeBlee
      • Re: Contradiction or paradox, MoeBlee
      • Re: Contradiction or paradox, Charlie-Boo
      • Re: Contradiction or paradox, MoeBlee
      • Re: Contradiction or paradox, MoeBlee
      • Re: Contradiction or paradox, Charlie-Boo
      • Re: Contradiction or paradox, MoeBlee
      • Re: Contradiction or paradox, MoeBlee
      • Re: Contradiction or paradox, MoeBlee
      • Re: Contradiction or paradox, MoeBlee
      • Re: Contradiction or paradox, MoeBlee
      • Re: Contradiction or paradox, Charlie-Boo
      • Re: Contradiction or paradox, MoeBlee
      • Re: Contradiction or paradox, Charlie-Boo
      • Re: Contradiction or paradox, TXLogic
      • Re: Contradiction or paradox, MoeBlee
      • Re: Contradiction or paradox, Charlie-Boo
      • Re: Contradiction or paradox, Charlie-Boo
      • Re: Contradiction or paradox, MoeBlee
      • Re: Contradiction or paradox, Charlie-Boo
      • Re: Contradiction or paradox, MoeBlee
      • Re: Contradiction or paradox, Charlie-Boo
      • Re: Contradiction or paradox, MoeBlee
      • Re: Contradiction or paradox, Aatu Koskensilta
      • Re: Contradiction or paradox, Charlie-Boo
      • Re: Contradiction or paradox, MoeBlee
      • Re: Contradiction or paradox, Charlie-Boo
      • Re: Contradiction or paradox, MoeBlee
      • Re: Contradiction or paradox, Charlie-Boo
      • Re: Contradiction or paradox, MoeBlee
      • Re: Contradiction or paradox, MoeBlee
      • Re: Contradiction or paradox, David C . Ullrich
      • Re: Contradiction or paradox, Charlie-Boo
      • Re: Contradiction or paradox, MoeBlee
      • Re: Contradiction or paradox, Charlie-Boo
      • Re: Contradiction or paradox, G . Frege
      • Re: Contradiction or paradox, Charlie-Boo
      • Re: Contradiction or paradox, MoeBlee
      • Re: Contradiction or paradox, Jesse F. Hughes
      • Re: Contradiction or paradox, Charlie-Boo
      • Re: Contradiction or paradox, MoeBlee
      • Re: Contradiction or paradox, Charlie-Boo
      • Re: Contradiction or paradox, MoeBlee
      • Re: Contradiction or paradox, Norman Megill
      • Re: Contradiction or paradox, Charlie-Boo
      • Re: Contradiction or paradox, MoeBlee
      • Re: Contradiction or paradox, Charlie-Boo
      • Re: Contradiction or paradox, MoeBlee
      • Re: Contradiction or paradox, David C . Ullrich
      • Re: Contradiction or paradox, Charlie-Boo
      • Re: Contradiction or paradox, MoeBlee
      • Re: Contradiction or paradox, Charlie-Boo
      • Re: Contradiction or paradox, Jesse F. Hughes
      • Re: Contradiction or paradox, Charlie-Boo
      • Re: Contradiction or paradox, Jesse F. Hughes
      • Re: Contradiction or paradox, Charlie-Boo
      • Re: Contradiction or paradox, G . Frege
      • Re: Contradiction or paradox, Jesse F. Hughes
      • Re: Contradiction or paradox, Charlie-Boo
      • Re: Contradiction or paradox, MoeBlee
      • Re: Contradiction or paradox, Charlie-Boo
      • Re: Contradiction or paradox, MoeBlee
      • Re: Contradiction or paradox, Charlie-Boo
      • Re: Contradiction or paradox, MoeBlee
      • Re: Contradiction or paradox, Charlie-Boo
      • Re: Contradiction or paradox, MoeBlee
      • Re: Contradiction or paradox, Jesse F. Hughes
      • Re: Contradiction or paradox, Charlie-Boo
      • Re: Contradiction or paradox, Jesse F. Hughes
      • Re: Contradiction or paradox, TXLogic
      • Re: Contradiction or paradox, TXLogic
      • Re: Contradiction or paradox, MoeBlee
      • Re: Contradiction or paradox, MoeBlee
      • Re: Contradiction or paradox, MoeBlee
      • Re: Contradiction or paradox, Charlie-Boo
      • Re: Contradiction or paradox, Jesse F. Hughes
      • Re: Contradiction or paradox, Charlie-Boo
      • Re: Contradiction or paradox, MoeBlee
      • Re: Contradiction or paradox, Charlie-Boo
      • Re: Contradiction or paradox, Jesse F. Hughes
      • Re: Contradiction or paradox, Charlie-Boo
      • Re: Contradiction or paradox, Jesse F. Hughes
      • Re: Contradiction or paradox, G . Frege
      • Re: Contradiction or paradox, Charlie-Boo
      • Re: Contradiction or paradox, MoeBlee
      • Re: Contradiction or paradox, Charlie-Boo
      • Re: Contradiction or paradox, MoeBlee
      • Re: Contradiction or paradox, Charlie-Boo
      • Re: Contradiction or paradox, MoeBlee
      • Re: Contradiction or paradox, Charlie-Boo
      • Re: Contradiction or paradox, MoeBlee
      • Re: Contradiction or paradox, Charlie-Boo
      • Re: Contradiction or paradox, Charlie-Boo
      • Re: Contradiction or paradox, Jesse F. Hughes
      • Re: Contradiction or paradox, Charlie-Boo
      • Re: Contradiction or paradox, MoeBlee
      • Re: Contradiction or paradox, Charlie-Boo
      • Re: Contradiction or paradox, MoeBlee
      • Re: Contradiction or paradox, Jesse F. Hughes
      • Re: Contradiction or paradox, G . Frege
      • Re: Contradiction or paradox, Charlie-Boo
      • Re: Contradiction or paradox, MoeBlee
      • Re: Contradiction or paradox, Charlie-Boo
      • Re: Contradiction or paradox, MoeBlee
  • Re: Contradiction or paradox, Charlie-Boo
    • Re: Contradiction or paradox, MoeBlee
      • Re: Contradiction or paradox, Charlie-Boo
      • Re: Contradiction or paradox, MoeBlee
      • Re: Contradiction or paradox, Charlie-Boo
      • Re: Contradiction or paradox, MoeBlee
      • Re: Contradiction or paradox, Charlie-Boo
      • Re: Contradiction or paradox, MoeBlee
      • Re: Contradiction or paradox, Charlie-Boo
      • Re: Contradiction or paradox, MoeBlee
      • Re: Contradiction or paradox, Charlie-Boo
      • Re: Contradiction or paradox, MoeBlee
      • Re: Contradiction or paradox, Charlie-Boo
      • Re: Contradiction or paradox, MoeBlee
    • Re: Contradiction or paradox, G . Frege
      • Re: Contradiction or paradox, Charlie-Boo
      • Re: Contradiction or paradox, G . Frege
      • Re: Contradiction or paradox, Charlie-Boo
      • Re: Contradiction or paradox, MoeBlee
      • Re: Contradiction or paradox, Charlie-Boo
      • Re: Contradiction or paradox, MoeBlee
      • Re: Contradiction or paradox, G . Frege
      • Re: Contradiction or paradox, G . Frege
      • Re: Contradiction or paradox, Charlie-Boo
      • Re: Contradiction or paradox, G . Frege
      • Re: Contradiction or paradox, MoeBlee
      • Re: Contradiction or paradox, MoeBlee
      • Re: Contradiction or paradox, Charlie-Boo
      • Re: Contradiction or paradox, MoeBlee
      • Re: Contradiction or paradox, G . Frege
      • Re: Contradiction or paradox, Charlie-Boo
      • Re: Contradiction or paradox, MoeBlee
      • Re: Contradiction or paradox, Charlie-Boo
      • Re: Contradiction or paradox, MoeBlee
      • Re: Contradiction or paradox, Charlie-Boo
      • Re: Contradiction or paradox, MoeBlee
      • Re: Contradiction or paradox, Charlie-Boo
      • Re: Contradiction or paradox, MoeBlee
      • Re: Contradiction or paradox, Jesse F. Hughes
      • Re: Contradiction or paradox, Charlie-Boo
• Re: Definition please, J P
• Re: Minimal set theory for model theory?, Keith Ramsay
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Minimal set theory for model theory?, Aatu Koskensilta
  • Re: Minimal set theory for model theory?, LauLuna
• Re: Descriptions, Presuppositions, Liar..., Newberry
  • Re: Descriptions, Presuppositions, Liar..., David C . Ullrich
• [FAQ, 06/11/05] Mathematical logic on the web, Boris 'pi' Piwinger
• Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, Phil
  • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, Virgil
    • Phool phails to understand the difference between a predicate and a term, george
  • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, karl malbrain
    • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, george
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, karl malbrain
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, MoeBlee
  • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, george
  • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, george
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, karl malbrain
    • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, Phil
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, Karl Malbrain
      • Phool doesn't know his limits, george
      • Re: Phool doesn't know his limits, karl malbrain
      • Message not available
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, Phil
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, george
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, george
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, george
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, Phil
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, karl malbrain
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, george
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, george
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, george
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, Phil
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, george
  • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, MoeBlee
  • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, george
    • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, MoeBlee
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, MoeBlee
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, george
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, MoeBlee
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, Phil
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, karl malbrain
    • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, Phil
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, karl malbrain
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, george
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, herbzet
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, Phil
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, karl malbrain
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, george
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, G . Frege
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, george
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, G . Frege
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, george
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, Aatu Koskensilta
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, Lee Rudolph
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, Phil
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, G . Frege
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, Aatu Koskensilta
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, george
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, Aatu Koskensilta
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, george
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, george
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, Aatu Koskensilta
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, G . Frege
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, herbzet
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, george
  • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, george
  • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, Phil
    • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, george
  • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, Phil
    • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, G . Frege
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, Virgil
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, Karl Malbrain
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, Virgil
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, Phil
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, karl malbrain
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, Phil
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, karl malbrain
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, Phil
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, george
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, MoeBlee
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, Phil
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, G . Frege
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, Phil
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, G . Frege
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, MoeBlee
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, MoeBlee
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, Phil
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, george
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, Jesse F. Hughes
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, G . Frege
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, george
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, Phil
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, MoeBlee
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, Phil
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, MoeBlee
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, MoeBlee
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, george
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, Phil
      • Another 400-line monster from Phool to the wrong person, george
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, george
      • Re: Cantor's CIRCULAR "proof" that evens = integers, george
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, george
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, Karl Malbrain
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, G . Frege
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, MoeBlee
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, MoeBlee
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, MoeBlee
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, Phil
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, G . Frege
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, karl malbrain
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, Phil
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, karl malbrain
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, george
      • Message not available
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, george
      • Message not available
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, george
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, karl malbrain
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, Phil
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, george
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, george
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, MoeBlee
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, G . Frege
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, karl malbrain
    • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, Jesse F. Hughes
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, Phil
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, Jesse F. Hughes
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, Phil
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, MoeBlee
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, G . Frege
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, Phil
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, Jesse F. Hughes
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, Phil
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, Jesse F. Hughes
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, Karl Malbrain
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, Virgil
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, Karl Malbrain
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, Virgil
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, Karl Malbrain
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, Phil
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, Karl Malbrain
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, MoeBlee
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, Phil
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, MoeBlee
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, G . Frege
      • Message not available
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, G . Frege
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, george
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, Jesse F. Hughes
      • axioms CREATE meaning, george
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, george
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, R. Srinivasan
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, G . Frege
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, G . Frege
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, G . Frege
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, herbzet
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, G . Frege
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, R. Srinivasan
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, G . Frege
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, karl malbrain
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, Aatu Koskensilta
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, herbzet
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, george
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, Aatu Koskensilta
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, george
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, george
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, george
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, Aatu Koskensilta
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, TXLogic
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, george
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, herbzet
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, george
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, TXLogic
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, george
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, TXLogic
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, george
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, TXLogic
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, TXLogic
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, Nam D. Nguyen
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, george
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, TXLogic
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, Daryl McCullough
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, herbzet
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, herbzet
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, george
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, herbzet
      • implications of false axioms, george
      • Re: implications of false axioms, herbzet
      • Re: implications of false axioms, herbzet
      • Re: implications of false axioms, george
      • Re: implications of false axioms, george
      • Re: implications of false axioms, herbzet
      • Re: implications of false axioms, george
      • Re: implications of false axioms, herbzet
      • Re: implications of false axioms, george
      • Re: implications of false axioms, herbzet
      • Re: implications of false axioms, george
      • Re: implications of false axioms, herbzet
      • Re: implications of false axioms, herbzet
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, Aatu Koskensilta
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, herbzet
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, Aatu Koskensilta
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, george
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, Daryl McCullough
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, Aatu Koskensilta
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, george
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, Aatu Koskensilta
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, george
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, Aatu Koskensilta
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, Aatu Koskensilta
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, Daryl McCullough
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, george
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, Aatu Koskensilta
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, Daryl McCullough
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, herbzet
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, herbzet
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, george
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, herbzet
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, george
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, herbzet
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, karl malbrain
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, george
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, MoeBlee
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, george
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, Jesse F. Hughes
      • I am really getting tired of people stepping all over my conversations, george
      • Re: I am really getting tired of people stepping all over my conversations, Daryl McCullough
      • Re: I am really getting tired of people stepping all over my conversations, James Burns
      • Re: I am really getting tired of people stepping all over my conversations, george
      • Re: I am really getting tired of people stepping all over my conversations, Jesse F. Hughes
      • Re: I am really getting tired of people stepping all over my conversations, Jim Burns
      • Re: I am really getting tired of people stepping all over my conversations, Phil
      • Re: I am really getting tired of people stepping all over my conversations, G . Frege
      • Re: I am really getting tired of people stepping all over my conversations, Phil
      • Re: I am really getting tired of people stepping all over my conversations, george
      • Re: I am really getting tired of people stepping all over my conversations, george
      • Re: I am really getting tired of people stepping all over my conversations, george
      • Re: I am really getting tired of people stepping all over my conversations, G . Frege
      • Re: I am really getting tired of people stepping all over my conversations, Phil
      • Re: I am really getting tired of people stepping all over my conversations, george
      • Re: I am really getting tired of people stepping all over my conversations, James Burns
      • Highlight reel from the George and Phil show, Re: I am really getting tired of people stepping all over my conversations, James Burns
      • Re: Highlight reel from the George and Phil show, Re: I am really getting tired of people stepping all over my conversations, george
      • Re: Highlight reel from the George and Phil show, Re: I am really getting tired of people stepping all over my conversations, James Burns
      • Re: Highlight reel from the George and Phil show, Re: I am really getting tired of people stepping all over my conversations, george
      • Re: Highlight reel from the George and Phil show, Re: I am really getting tired of people stepping all over my conversations, george
      • Re: Highlight reel from the George and Phil show, Re: I am really getting tired of people stepping all over my conversations, James Burns
      • Re: I am really getting tired of people stepping all over my conversations, george
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, MoeBlee
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, george
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, MoeBlee
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, george
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, Aatu Koskensilta
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, george
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, R. Srinivasan
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, R. Srinivasan
    • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, MoeBlee
    • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, george
    • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, george
    • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, george
  • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, george
    • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, Aatu Koskensilta
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, Herman Jurjus
      • Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers, Aatu Koskensilta

We are proud to have Web Hosting and Rack Housing from 9 Net Avenue Deutschland.
(10)