sci.logic

• Thread Index

---

• Re: Formalizing the Fundamental Theorem of Arithmetic
  • From: Jesse F. Hughes
• Re: Formalizing the Fundamental Theorem of Arithmetic
  • From: David C . Ullrich
• Re: Answer "how to prove ~(P <--> Q) |- ~P <-->Q "
  • From: Jesse F. Hughes
• Re: Answer "how to prove ~(P <--> Q) |- ~P <-->Q "
  • From: translogi
• Re: Answer "how to prove ~(P <--> Q) |- ~P <-->Q "
  • From: herbzet
• Re: Answer "how to prove ~(P <--> Q) |- ~P <-->Q "
  • From: herbzet
• On the nature of implication
  • From: herbzet
• Re: Answer "how to prove ~(P <--> Q) |- ~P <-->Q "
  • From: G . Frege
• Re: Answer "how to prove ~(P <--> Q) |- ~P <-->Q "
  • From: George Dance
• Re: Answer "how to prove ~(P <--> Q) |- ~P <-->Q "
  • From: Frederick Williams
• Re: Answer "how to prove ~(P <--> Q) |- ~P <-->Q "
  • From: Frederick Williams
• Re: Answer "how to prove ~(P <--> Q) |- ~P <-->Q "
  • From: Conbra
• Re: Answer "how to prove ~(P <--> Q) |- ~P <-->Q "
  • From: Conbra
• Re: Answer "how to prove ~(P <--> Q) |- ~P <-->Q "
  • From: George Dance
• Re: join the points.
  • From: Peter_Smith
• Re: join the points.
  • From: Herman Jurjus
• Re: Linnebo's argument against unrestricted quantification
  • From: LauLuna
• Re: join the points.
  • From: Peter_Smith
• join the points.
  • From: MasgiSomnath
• Re: Newbie asks a logical question!
  • From: Jonathan
• Re: Newbie asks a logical question!
  • From: Charlie-Boo
• Newbie asks a logical question!
  • From: Jonathan
• Re: Prize Announced for Determining the Boundaries of Turing Machine Computation
  • From: Charlie-Boo
• Re: Prize Announced for Determining the Boundaries of Turing Machine Computation
  • From: Charlie-Boo
• Re: Answer "how to prove ~(P <--> Q) |- ~P <-->Q "
  • From: Rupert
• Re: Answer "how to prove ~(P <--> Q) |- ~P <-->Q "
  • From: Conbra
• Re: Linnebo's argument against unrestricted quantification
  • From: LauLuna
• Re: Linnebo's argument against unrestricted quantification
  • From: Peter_Smith
• Re: Linnebo's argument against unrestricted quantification
  • From: G . Frege
• Linnebo's argument against unrestricted quantification
  • From: LauLuna
• Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Answer "how to prove ~(P <--> Q) |- ~P <-->Q "
  • From: George Dance
• Re: Prize Announced for Determining the Boundaries of Turing Machine Computation
  • From: Jesse F. Hughes
• Re: Answer "how to prove ~(P <--> Q) |- ~P <-->Q "
  • From: Rupert
• Re: Contradiction or paradox
  • From: MoeBlee
• Re: Contradiction or paradox
  • From: MoeBlee
• Re: Contradiction or paradox
  • From: MoeBlee
• Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers
  • From: herbzet
• Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers
  • From: Aatu Koskensilta
• Re: Formalizing the Fundamental Theorem of Arithmetic
  • From: george
• Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers
  • From: george
• Re: Prize Announced for Determining the Boundaries of Turing Machine Computation
  • From: Charlie-Boo
• Re: Prize Announced for Determining the Boundaries of Turing Machine Computation
  • From: Charlie-Boo
• Re: Contradiction or paradox
  • From: Charlie-Boo
• Re: Contradiction or paradox
  • From: Jesse F. Hughes
• Re: Answer "how to prove ~(P <--> Q) |- ~P <-->Q "
  • From: Conbra
• Re: question
  • From: Keith Ramsay
• Re: Answer "how to prove ~(P <--> Q) |- ~P <-->Q "
  • From: Conbra
• Re: Answer "how to prove ~(P <--> Q) |- ~P <-->Q "
  • From: translogi
• Re: Contradiction or paradox
  • From: Charlie-Boo
• Re: Contradiction or paradox
  • From: Charlie-Boo
• yourdocumentsource janrom...@gmail.com Phony comments
  • From: Adam
• Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers
  • From: Aatu Koskensilta
• Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers
  • From: george
• Re: question
  • From: Rupert
• question
  • From: Rupert
• Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers
  • From: herbzet
• Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers
  • From: george
• Re: hyperbolic geometry
  • From: Rupert
• Re: hyperbolic geometry
  • From: Rupert
• Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers
  • From: herbzet
• Re: hyperbolic geometry
  • From: Rupert
• Answer "how to prove ~(P <--> Q) |- ~P <-->Q "
  • From: Conbra
• Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers
  • From: herbzet
• Re: hyperbolic geometry
  • From: Keith Ramsay
• Re: Subsets of cardinals in a well-ordering
  • From: Robert Sheskey
• Re: Contradiction or paradox
  • From: MoeBlee
• Re: Contradiction or paradox
  • From: MoeBlee
• Re: Contradiction or paradox
  • From: MoeBlee
• Re: Contradiction or paradox
  • From: MoeBlee
• Re: Contradiction or paradox
  • From: MoeBlee
• Re: Contradiction or paradox
  • From: MoeBlee
• Re: Turing and Mathematics
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• Re: Prize Announced for Determining the Boundaries of Turing Machine Computation
  • From: MoeBlee
• Re: Prize Announced for Determining the Boundaries of Turing Machine Computation
  • From: Jesse F. Hughes
• Re: Contradiction or paradox
  • From: TXLogic
• Re: Contradiction or paradox
  • From: TXLogic
• Re: Turing and Mathematics
  • From: Charlie-Boo
• Re: Prize Announced for Determining the Boundaries of Turing Machine Computation
  • From: Charlie-Boo
• Re: Contradiction or paradox
  • From: Charlie-Boo
• Re: Contradiction or paradox
  • From: Charlie-Boo
• Re: Prize Announced for Determining the Boundaries of Turing Machine Computation
  • From: Jesse F. Hughes
• Re: Contradiction or paradox
  • From: Charlie-Boo
• Re: Contradiction or paradox
  • From: Jesse F. Hughes
• Re: Contradiction or paradox
  • From: Charlie-Boo
• Re: Contradiction or paradox
  • From: Charlie-Boo
• Re: Contradiction or paradox
  • From: Charlie-Boo
• Re: Contradiction or paradox
  • From: Charlie-Boo
• Turing and Mathematics
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• Re: Prize Announced for Determining the Boundaries of Turing Machine Computation
  • From: Charlie-Boo
• Re: Prize Announced for Determining the Boundaries of Turing Machine Computation
  • From: Charlie-Boo
• Re: Prize Announced for Determining the Boundaries of Turing Machine Computation
  • From: Jesse F. Hughes
• Re: Formalizing the Fundamental Theorem of Arithmetic
  • From: Jesse F. Hughes
• Re: hyperbolic geometry
  • From: Rupert
• Big bang theory solved.
  • From: Peter_W
• Calculating Concepts in Contradiction on Concept Algebra
  • From: Conbra
• Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers
  • From: herbzet
• Re: hyperbolic geometry
  • From: Keith Ramsay
• Re: Prize Announced for Determining the Boundaries of Turing Machine Computation
  • From: MoeBlee
• Re: Formalizing the Fundamental Theorem of Arithmetic
  • From: MoeBlee
• Re: Formalizing the Fundamental Theorem of Arithmetic
  • From: MoeBlee
• Re: Contradiction or paradox
  • From: MoeBlee
• Re: Contradiction or paradox
  • From: MoeBlee
• Re: Contradiction or paradox
  • From: MoeBlee
• Re: Contradiction or paradox
  • From: Charlie-Boo
• Re: Contradiction or paradox
  • From: MoeBlee
• Re: Contradiction or paradox
  • From: Charlie-Boo
• Re: Contradiction or paradox
  • From: Charlie-Boo
• Re: Contradiction or paradox
  • From: MoeBlee
• hyperbolic geometry
  • From: Rupert
• Re: Contradiction or paradox
  • From: MoeBlee
• Re: Contradiction or paradox
  • From: MoeBlee
• Re: Contradiction or paradox
  • From: Charlie-Boo
• Re: Contradiction or paradox
  • From: Charlie-Boo
• Re: Contradiction or paradox
  • From: Charlie-Boo
• Re: Contradiction or paradox
  • From: Charlie-Boo
• Re: Contradiction or paradox
  • From: Charlie-Boo
• Re: Formalizing the Fundamental Theorem of Arithmetic
  • From: Charlie-Boo
• Re: Inductive Logic System and Machine Learning - Free White Paper
  • From: Charlie-Boo
• Re: Formalizing the Fundamental Theorem of Arithmetic
  • From: Charlie-Boo
• Re: Prize Announced for Determining the Boundaries of Turing Machine Computation
  • From: Charlie-Boo
• Re: Prize Announced for Determining the Boundaries of Turing Machine Computation
  • From: Charlie-Boo
• Re: Formalizing the Fundamental Theorem of Arithmetic
  • From: Jesse F. Hughes
• Re: Prize Announced for Determining the Boundaries of Turing Machine Computation
  • From: Charlie-Boo
• Re: Formalizing the Fundamental Theorem of Arithmetic
  • From: Charlie-Boo
• Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers
  • From: Aatu Koskensilta
• Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers
  • From: george
• Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers
  • From: george
• Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers
  • From: Aatu Koskensilta
• Re: Formalizing the Fundamental Theorem of Arithmetic
  • From: Aatu Koskensilta
• Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers
  • From: Aatu Koskensilta
• Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Formalizing the Fundamental Theorem of Arithmetic
  • From: george
• Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers
  • From: george
• Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers
  • From: george
• Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers
  • From: Aatu Koskensilta
• Re: Formalizing the Fundamental Theorem of Arithmetic
  • From: Rupert
• Re: Formalizing the Fundamental Theorem of Arithmetic
  • From: Aatu Koskensilta
• Re: Formalizing the Fundamental Theorem of Arithmetic
  • From: G . Frege
• Formalizing the Fundamental Theorem of Arithmetic
  • From: mmweiss
• Re: Highlight reel from the George and Phil show, Re: I am really getting tired of people stepping all over my conversations
  • From: James Burns
• Re: Can We Quantify over Everything?
  • From: george
• Re: Can We Quantify over Everything?
  • From: george
• Re: Can We Quantify over Everything?
  • From: george
• Re: Can We Quantify over Everything?
  • From: george
• Re: Can We Quantify over Everything?
  • From: george
• Re: Can We Quantify over Everything?
  • From: george
• Re: Can We Quantify over Everything?
  • From: george
• Re: Can We Quantify over Everything?
  • From: george
• Re: Can We Quantify over Everything?
  • From: george
• Re: Can We Quantify over Everything?
  • From: george
• Re: Can We Quantify over Everything?
  • From: george
• Re: Can We Quantify over Everything?
  • From: george
• Re: Can We Quantify over Everything?
  • From: george
• Re: Can We Quantify over Everything?
  • From: george
• Re: Can We Quantify over Everything?
  • From: george
• Re: implications of false axioms
  • From: herbzet
• Re: implications of false axioms
  • From: herbzet
• Re: implications of false axioms
  • From: herbzet
• Subsets of cardinals in a well-ordering
  • From: Justin Palumbo
• Re: Can We Quantify over Everything?
  • From: LauLuna
• Re: Can We Quantify over Everything?
  • From: LauLuna
• Re: Can We Quantify over Everything?
  • From: LauLuna
• Re: Can We Quantify over Everything?
  • From: LauLuna
• Re: Can We Quantify over Everything?
  • From: LauLuna
• Re: implications of false axioms
  • From: herbzet
• Re: Prize Announced for Determining the Boundaries of Turing Machine Computation
  • From: george
• Re: Contradiction or paradox
  • From: Jesse F. Hughes
• Re: Prize Announced for Determining the Boundaries of Turing Machine Computation
  • From: Jesse F. Hughes
• Re: Contradiction or paradox
  • From: Jesse F. Hughes
• Re: Contradiction or paradox
  • From: Jesse F. Hughes
• Re: Contradiction or paradox
  • From: MoeBlee
• Re: Contradiction or paradox
  • From: MoeBlee
• Re: Contradiction or paradox
  • From: MoeBlee
• Re: Contradiction or paradox
  • From: MoeBlee
• Re: Contradiction or paradox
  • From: MoeBlee
• Re: Contradiction or paradox
  • From: MoeBlee
• Re: Contradiction or paradox
  • From: MoeBlee
• Re: Contradiction or paradox
  • From: MoeBlee
• Re: Contradiction or paradox
  • From: MoeBlee
• Re: Contradiction or paradox
  • From: MoeBlee
• Re: Contradiction or paradox
  • From: Charlie-Boo
• Re: Contradiction or paradox
  • From: Charlie-Boo
• Re: Contradiction or paradox
  • From: Charlie-Boo
• Re: Contradiction or paradox
  • From: Charlie-Boo
• Re: Contradiction or paradox
  • From: Charlie-Boo
• Re: An exercise in set theory: How high do we get by autonomously iterating the powerset operation?
  • From: Rupert
• Re: Contradiction or paradox
  • From: Charlie-Boo
• Call For Participation: WORLDCOMP'07: joint conferences in CS, CE, and applied computing, June 25-28, 2007, Las Vegas
  • From: A. M. G. Solo
• Re: Prize Announced for Determining the Boundaries of Turing Machine Computation
  • From: Charlie-Boo
• Re: An exercise in set theory: How high do we get by autonomously iterating the powerset operation?
  • From: Rupert
• Re: Highlight reel from the George and Phil show, Re: I am really getting tired of people stepping all over my conversations
  • From: george
• Re: Highlight reel from the George and Phil show, Re: I am really getting tired of people stepping all over my conversations
  • From: george
• Re: Highlight reel from the George and Phil show, Re: I am really getting tired of people stepping all over my conversations
  • From: James Burns
• Re: Contradiction or paradox
  • From: G . Frege
• Re: Highlight reel from the George and Phil show, Re: I am really getting tired of people stepping all over my conversations
  • From: george
• Re: Can We Quantify over Everything?
  • From: george
• Re: Can We Quantify over Everything?
  • From: LauLuna
• Re: Can We Quantify over Everything?
  • From: LauLuna
• Re: Can We Quantify over Everything?
  • From: G . Frege
• Re: Can We Quantify over Everything?
  • From: G . Frege
• Re: Can We Quantify over Everything?
  • From: Peter_Smith
• Re: Can We Quantify over Everything?
  • From: LauLuna
• Re: Can We Quantify over Everything?
  • From: george
• Re: Can We Quantify over Everything?
  • From: LauLuna
• Re: Can We Quantify over Everything?
  • From: LauLuna
• Re: An exercise in set theory: How high do we get by autonomously iterating the powerset operation?
  • From: Aatu Koskensilta
• Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers
  • From: MoeBlee
• Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers
  • From: MoeBlee
• Re: An exercise in set theory: How high do we get by autonomously iterating the powerset operation?
  • From: Rupert
• Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers
  • From: Phil
• Re: I am really getting tired of people stepping all over my conversations
  • From: Phil
• Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers
  • From: MoeBlee
• Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers
  • From: Phil
• Highlight reel from the George and Phil show, Re: I am really getting tired of people stepping all over my conversations
  • From: James Burns
• Re: implications of false axioms
  • From: george
• Re: I am really getting tired of people stepping all over my conversations
  • From: James Burns
• Re: implications of false axioms
  • From: george
• Re: implications of false axioms
  • From: george
• Re: Cantor's CIRCULAR "proof" that evens = integers
  • From: george
• Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers
  • From: george
• Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers
  • From: george
• Another 400-line monster from Phool to the wrong person
  • From: george
• Re: I am really getting tired of people stepping all over my conversations
  • From: G . Frege
• Re: I am really getting tired of people stepping all over my conversations
  • From: george
• Re: I am really getting tired of people stepping all over my conversations
  • From: george
• Re: I am really getting tired of people stepping all over my conversations
  • From: george
• Re: I am really getting tired of people stepping all over my conversations
  • From: george
• Re: I am really getting tired of people stepping all over my conversations
  • From: george
• Re: The Truth of Truly True Truth
  • From: Jesse F. Hughes
• Re: I am really getting tired of people stepping all over my conversations
  • From: Phil
• Re: Can We Quantify over Everything?
  • From: G . Frege
• Re: Can We Quantify over Everything?
  • From: LauLuna
• Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers
  • From: Phil
• Re: I am really getting tired of people stepping all over my conversations
  • From: G . Frege
• Re: I am really getting tired of people stepping all over my conversations
  • From: Phil
• Re: implications of false axioms
  • From: herbzet
• Re: Can We Quantify over Everything?
  • From: G . Frege
• Re: Can We Quantify over Everything?
  • From: Peter_Smith
• Re: Can We Quantify over Everything?
  • From: G . Frege
• Re: Contradiction or paradox
  • From: G . Frege
• Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers
  • From: G . Frege
• Re: Contradiction or paradox
  • From: MoeBlee
• Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers
  • From: Jesse F. Hughes
• Re: Contradiction or paradox
  • From: MoeBlee
• Re: Contradiction or paradox
  • From: MoeBlee
• Re: Contradiction or paradox
  • From: MoeBlee
• Re: implications of false axioms
  • From: george
• Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers
  • From: george
• Re: Contradiction or paradox
  • From: MoeBlee
• Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers
  • From: george
• Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers
  • From: george
• Re: implications of false axioms
  • From: george
• Re: Contradiction or paradox
  • From: MoeBlee
• Re: Contradiction or paradox
  • From: MoeBlee
• Re: Contradiction or paradox
  • From: Norman Megill
• Re: Contradiction or paradox
  • From: Jesse F. Hughes
• Re: Contradiction or paradox
  • From: Jesse F. Hughes
• Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers
  • From: Phil
• Re: Contradiction or paradox
  • From: Charlie-Boo
• Re: Contradiction or paradox
  • From: G . Frege
• Re: Contradiction or paradox
  • From: Charlie-Boo
• Re: Contradiction or paradox
  • From: G . Frege
• Re: Contradiction or paradox
  • From: Charlie-Boo
• Re: Contradiction or paradox
  • From: G . Frege
• Re: Contradiction or paradox
  • From: Charlie-Boo
• Re: Contradiction or paradox
  • From: Charlie-Boo
• Re: Contradiction or paradox
  • From: Peter Percival
• Re: Contradiction or paradox
  • From: Charlie-Boo
• Re: Contradiction or paradox
  • From: Jesse F. Hughes
• Re: Contradiction or paradox
  • From: Charlie-Boo
• Re: An exercise in set theory: How high do we get by autonomously iterating the powerset operation?
  • From: Peter Percival
• Re: Contradiction or paradox
  • From: David C . Ullrich
• Inductive Logic System and Machine Learning - Free White Paper
  • From: tommak
• Re: Contradiction or paradox
  • From: MoeBlee
• Re: Contradiction or paradox
  • From: MoeBlee
• Re: Contradiction or paradox
  • From: MoeBlee
• Re: Contradiction or paradox
  • From: MoeBlee
• Re: Contradiction or paradox
  • From: MoeBlee
• Re: Contradiction or paradox
  • From: MoeBlee
• Re: Contradiction or paradox
  • From: MoeBlee
• Re: Contradiction or paradox
  • From: MoeBlee
• Re: Contradiction or paradox
  • From: Jesse F. Hughes
• Re: Contradiction or paradox
  • From: Charlie-Boo
• Re: Contradiction or paradox
  • From: Charlie-Boo
• Re: Contradiction or paradox
  • From: Charlie-Boo
• Re: Contradiction or paradox
  • From: Charlie-Boo
• Re: Contradiction or paradox
  • From: Jesse F. Hughes
• Re: Contradiction or paradox
  • From: Charlie-Boo
• Re: Contradiction or paradox
  • From: Charlie-Boo
• Re: Contradiction or paradox
  • From: Charlie-Boo
• Re: Contradiction or paradox
  • From: Charlie-Boo
• Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers
  • From: herbzet
• Re: Contradiction or paradox
  • From: Aatu Koskensilta
• Logic, Turkish constitution and the latest political events
  • From: myg
• Re: Contradiction or paradox
  • From: David C . Ullrich
• Re: implications of false axioms
  • From: herbzet
• Re: Contradiction or paradox
  • From: TXLogic
• Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Contradiction or paradox
  • From: MoeBlee
• Re: Contradiction or paradox
  • From: MoeBlee
• Re: Contradiction or paradox
  • From: MoeBlee
• Re: Contradiction or paradox
  • From: MoeBlee
• Re: Contradiction or paradox
  • From: Charlie-Boo
• Re: Contradiction or paradox
  • From: Charlie-Boo
• Re: Contradiction or paradox
  • From: MoeBlee
• Re: Contradiction or paradox
  • From: MoeBlee
• Re: Contradiction or paradox
  • From: MoeBlee
• Re: Contradiction or paradox
  • From: TXLogic
• Re: Contradiction or paradox
  • From: Charlie-Boo
• Re: Contradiction or paradox
  • From: Charlie-Boo
• Re: Contradiction or paradox
  • From: Charlie-Boo
• Re: Contradiction or paradox
  • From: Charlie-Boo
• Re: The Definition of Points
  • From: markwh04
• puzzeling with Smullyan's "forever Undecided"
  • From: translogi
• Re: Contradiction or paradox
  • From: Jesse F. Hughes
• Re: Contradiction or paradox
  • From: MoeBlee
• Re: Contradiction or paradox
  • From: MoeBlee
• Re: Contradiction or paradox
  • From: G . Frege
• Re: Contradiction or paradox
  • From: G . Frege
• Re: Contradiction or paradox
  • From: MoeBlee
• Re: Contradiction or paradox
  • From: MoeBlee
• Re: Contradiction or paradox
  • From: MoeBlee
• Re: Contradiction or paradox
  • From: MoeBlee
• Re: Critics of Douglas Lenat's projects ???
  • From: J. Burse
• Re: Contradiction or paradox
  • From: MoeBlee
• Re: Contradiction or paradox
  • From: MoeBlee
• Critics of Douglas Lenat's projects ???
  • From: mlck1900
• Re: Contradiction or paradox
  • From: Charlie-Boo
• Re: Contradiction or paradox
  • From: Charlie-Boo
• Re: Contradiction or paradox
  • From: Jesse F. Hughes
• Re: Contradiction or paradox
  • From: Charlie-Boo
• Set theory with urelements and elementary particles
  • From: adib . jebara
• Re: Contradiction or paradox
  • From: Charlie-Boo
• Re: Contradiction or paradox
  • From: Charlie-Boo
• Re: Contradiction or paradox
  • From: Charlie-Boo
• Re: Contradiction or paradox
  • From: Charlie-Boo
• Re: Contradiction or paradox
  • From: Charlie-Boo
• Re: Contradiction or paradox
  • From: Charlie-Boo
• Re: Contradiction or paradox
  • From: Charlie-Boo
• Re: Prize Announced for Determining the Boundaries of Turing Machine Computation
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• Re: Contradiction or paradox
  • From: Charlie-Boo
• Re: Contradiction or paradox
  • From: Charlie-Boo
• Re: Contradiction or paradox
  • From: Charlie-Boo
• Re: Contradiction or paradox
  • From: MoeBlee
• Re: Contradiction or paradox
  • From: TXLogic
• Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers
  • From: Nam D. Nguyen
• Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers
  • From: TXLogic
• Re: Contradiction or paradox
  • From: MoeBlee
• Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers
  • From: TXLogic
• Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers
  • From: TXLogic
• Re: Contradiction or paradox
  • From: MoeBlee
• Re: Contradiction or paradox
  • From: MoeBlee
• Re: Contradiction or paradox
  • From: MoeBlee
• Re: Contradiction or paradox
  • From: Charlie-Boo
• Re: Contradiction or paradox
  • From: Charlie-Boo
• Re: Contradiction or paradox
  • From: G . Frege
• Re: Contradiction or paradox
  • From: Jesse F. Hughes
• Re: Contradiction or paradox
  • From: G . Frege
• Re: Contradiction or paradox
  • From: Charlie-Boo
• Re: Contradiction or paradox
  • From: Charlie-Boo
• Re: Contradiction or paradox
  • From: Charlie-Boo
• Re: Contradiction or paradox
  • From: Charlie-Boo
• Re: Contradiction or paradox
  • From: Charlie-Boo
• Re: Contradiction or paradox
  • From: G . Frege
• Re: Contradiction or paradox
  • From: MoeBlee
• Re: Contradiction or paradox
  • From: G . Frege
• Re: Contradiction or paradox
  • From: MoeBlee
• Re: Contradiction or paradox
  • From: Jesse F. Hughes
• Re: Contradiction or paradox
  • From: Charlie-Boo
• Re: Contradiction or paradox
  • From: Charlie-Boo
• Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers
  • From: george
• Re: Contradiction or paradox
  • From: MoeBlee
• Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers
  • From: george
• Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers
  • From: Karl Malbrain
• Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers
  • From: george
• Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers
  • From: george
• Re: Contradiction or paradox
  • From: MoeBlee
• Re: Contradiction or paradox
  • From: Charlie-Boo
• Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers
  • From: george
• Re: Contradiction or paradox
  • From: MoeBlee
• Re: Contradiction or paradox
  • From: Charlie-Boo
• Re: Contradiction or paradox
  • From: Charlie-Boo
• Re: Contradiction or paradox
  • From: Charlie-Boo
• Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers
  • From: G . Frege
• Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers
  • From: G . Frege
• Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers
  • From: MoeBlee
• Re: Contradiction or paradox
  • From: MoeBlee
• Re: Contradiction or paradox
  • From: MoeBlee
• Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers
  • From: MoeBlee
• Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers
  • From: MoeBlee
• Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers
  • From: Phil
• Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers
  • From: Phil
• Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers
  • From: Phil
• Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers
  • From: karl malbrain
• Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers
  • From: karl malbrain
• Re: Contradiction or paradox
  • From: Jesse F. Hughes
• Re: Contradiction or paradox
  • From: Charlie-Boo
• Re: Contradiction or paradox
  • From: Charlie-Boo
• Re: Descriptions, Presuppositions, Liar, Gödel
  • From: Charlie-Boo
• Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers
  • From: Jesse F. Hughes
• Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers
  • From: G . Frege
• Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers
  • From: G . Frege
• Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers
  • From: Phil
• Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers
  • From: TXLogic
• Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers
  • From: Phil
• Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers
  • From: Phil
• Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers
  • From: Phil
• Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers
  • From: Phil
• Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers
  • From: Phil
• Re: implications of false axioms
  • From: herbzet
• Re: A proof showing 3=2??? I can't seem to find a flaw...
  • From: Barb Knox
• Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers
  • From: MoeBlee
• Re: A proof showing 3=2??? I can't seem to find a flaw...
  • From: jbowen7
• Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers
  • From: george
• Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers
  • From: george
• Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers
  • From: george
• Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers
  • From: karl malbrain
• Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers
  • From: karl malbrain
• Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers
  • From: MoeBlee
• Prize Announced for Determining the Boundaries of Turing Machine Computation
  • From: Wolfram Research
• Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers
  • From: MoeBlee
• Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers
  • From: karl malbrain
• Re: Modal logic example
  • From: J. Burse
• Re: Modal logic example
  • From: J. Burse
• Re: Modal logic example
  • From: Jesse F. Hughes
• A comment on everyday language... in a logic textbook
  • From: Michel . Coutourier
• Re: Modal logic example
  • From: Aatu Koskensilta
• Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers
  • From: Aatu Koskensilta
• Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers
  • From: Aatu Koskensilta
• Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers
  • From: herbzet
• Re: Modal logic example
  • From: Gboro54
• Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers
  • From: herbzet
• Re: Modal logic example
  • From: Lee Rudolph
• Re: Modal logic example
  • From: Jesse F. Hughes
• Re: Modal logic example
  • From: Barb Knox
• Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers
  • From: Phil
• Re: Contradiction or paradox
  • From: MoeBlee
• Re: Contradiction or paradox
  • From: Charlie-Boo
• Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers
  • From: TXLogic
• implications of false axioms
  • From: george
• Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers
  • From: george
• Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers
  • From: george
• Re: The Definition of Points
  • From: LauLuna
• Re: Modal logic example
  • From: Lee Rudolph
• Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers
  • From: herbzet
• Re: Modal logic example
  • From: Jesse F. Hughes
• The Definition of Points
  • From: markwh04
• Re: Modal logic example
  • From: TXLogic
• Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers
  • From: TXLogic
• Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers
  • From: george
• Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers
  • From: george
• Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers
  • From: george
• Re: Modal logic example
  • From: Frederick Williams
• Re: Modal logic example
  • From: galathaea
• Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers
  • From: Aatu Koskensilta
• Re: Modal logic example
  • From: Aatu Koskensilta
• Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers
  • From: george
• Can you solve this?
  • From: mine hub2
• Re: Modal logic example
  • From: Gboro54
• Re: Modal logic example
  • From: Jesse F. Hughes
• Re: Modal logic example
  • From: Gboro54
• Re: Skolem Paradox Question
  • From: george
• Re: Skolem Paradox Question
  • From: george
• Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers
  • From: herbzet
• Re: I am really getting tired of people stepping all over my conversations
  • From: Jim Burns
• Re: Modal logic example
  • From: Peter_Smith
• Re: Modal logic example
  • From: Jesse F. Hughes
• Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers
  • From: Aatu Koskensilta
• Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers
  • From: Aatu Koskensilta
• Re: Modal logic example
  • From: Barb Knox
• Re: Grz
  • From: Frederick Williams
• Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers
  • From: Herman Jurjus
• Re: Shift-errors, recursive definitions
  • From: philneo2001
• Re: Grz
  • From: logicstudy
• Re: UHF RADIOS AND WALKIE TALKIES
  • From: Frederick Williams
• Re: Help with proof in Gentzen's system NK
  • From: Keith Ramsay
• Re: Modal logic example
  • From: Gboro54
• UHF RADIOS AND WALKIE TALKIES
  • From: ben.ajenoui@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Phool nearly discovers equipollence
  • From: george
• Is the online solution right
  • From: Ravi
• Re: Grz
  • From: Aatu Koskensilta
• Modal logic example
  • From: Gboro54
• Re: Grz
  • From: Frederick Williams
• Re: Grz
  • From: Frederick Williams
• Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers
  • From: Aatu Koskensilta
• Re: Grz
  • From: logicstudy
• Re: Grz
  • From: Rupert
• Re: I am really getting tired of people stepping all over my conversations
  • From: Jesse F. Hughes
• Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers
  • From: george
• Re: I am really getting tired of people stepping all over my conversations
  • From: george
• Beginner's question about NAFL
  • From: karl malbrain
• Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers
  • From: karl malbrain
• Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers
  • From: george
• Re: Help with proof in Gentzen's system NK
  • From: Jöran Egdahl
• Re: Help with proof in Gentzen's system NK
  • From: Jöran Egdahl
• Grz
  • From: logicstudy
• Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers
  • From: G . Frege
• Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers
  • From: R. Srinivasan
• Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers
  • From: G . Frege
• Re: I am really getting tired of people stepping all over my conversations
  • From: James Burns
• Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers
  • From: Aatu Koskensilta
• Re: Shift-errors, recursive definitions
  • From: karl malbrain
• Re: I am really getting tired of people stepping all over my conversations
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• I am really getting tired of people stepping all over my conversations
  • From: george
• Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers
  • From: george
• Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers
  • From: george
• Re: Contradiction or paradox
  • From: translogi
• Re: #4 set-up of MAD Fleet; new book: "Mutually Assured Destruction (MAD) Fleet Saves the World from Nuclear Detonation and Radioactive Pollution"
  • From: Jesse F. Hughes
• Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers
  • From: R. Srinivasan
• Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers
  • From: R. Srinivasan
• Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers
  • From: herbzet
• Re: #4 set-up of MAD Fleet; new book: "Mutually Assured Destruction (MAD) Fleet Saves the World from Nuclear Detonation and Radioactive Pollution"
  • From: a_plutonium
• Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers
  • From: G . Frege
• Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers
  • From: G . Frege
• Re: #4 set-up of MAD Fleet; new book: "Mutually Assured Destruction (MAD) Fleet Saves the World from Nuclear Detonation and Radioactive Pollution"
  • From: Jesse F. Hughes
• Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers
  • From: karl malbrain
• Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers
  • From: G . Frege
• Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers
  • From: MoeBlee
• Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers
  • From: MoeBlee
• Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers
  • From: MoeBlee
• Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers
  • From: george
• Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers
  • From: Jesse F. Hughes
• Re: Shift-errors, recursive definitions
  • From: george
• Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers
  • From: george
• Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers
  • From: MoeBlee
• Re: Shift-errors, recursive definitions
  • From: karl malbrain
• Re: Shift-errors, recursive definitions
  • From: philneo2001
• Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers
  • From: george
• Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers
  • From: karl malbrain
• Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers
  • From: G . Frege
• Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers
  • From: R. Srinivasan
• Re: Phool nearly discovers equipollence
  • From: george
• Phool nearly defines multiplication
  • From: george
• Re: Phool nearly discovers equipollence
  • From: J. Burse
• Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers
  • From: george
• Theoretical CS Search Engine
  • From: gphilip . newsgroups
• Re: Phool nearly discovers equipollence
  • From: Ross A. Finlayson
• Re: Phool nearly discovers equipollence
  • From: karl malbrain
• Re: Phool nearly discovers equipollence
  • From: J. Burse
• MS Computer Science / Masters Program in Information Systems (MPIS)
  • From: mba.news@xxxxxxxxx
• MBA in Telecommunication Management (MPTM)
  • From: mba.news@xxxxxxxxx
• MBA in Telecommunication Management (MPTM)
  • From: mba.news@xxxxxxxxx
• MBA in Telecommunication Management (MPTM)
  • From: mba.news@xxxxxxxxx
• MS Computer Science / Masters Program in Information Systems (MPIS)
  • From: mba.news@xxxxxxxxx
• MS Computer Science / Masters Program in Information Systems (MPIS)
  • From: mba.news@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Phool nearly discovers equipollence
  • From: Ross A. Finlayson
• Phool nearly defines multiplication
  • From: george
• Phool nearly discovers equipollence
  • From: george
• Re: Contradiction or paradox
  • From: Charlie-Boo
• Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers
  • From: george
• pandaresearch
  • From: renduchintalavinay@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers
  • From: george
• Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers
  • From: george
• Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers
  • From: george
• Re: Modal logic
  • From: BuddhaThu
• Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers
  • From: G . Frege
• axioms CREATE meaning
  • From: george
• Re: Help with proof in Gentzen's system NK
  • From: Frederick Williams
• Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers
  • From: Karl Malbrain
• Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers
  • From: Karl Malbrain
• Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers
  • From: Jesse F. Hughes
• Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers
  • From: Jesse F. Hughes
• Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers
  • From: G . Frege
• Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers
  • From: G . Frege
• Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers
  • From: G . Frege
• Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers
  • From: MoeBlee
• Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers
  • From: MoeBlee
• Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers
  • From: Phil
• Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers
  • From: Phil
• Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers
  • From: Phil
• Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers
  • From: MoeBlee
• Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers
  • From: MoeBlee
• Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers
  • From: Virgil
• Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers
  • From: Virgil
• Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers
  • From: Karl Malbrain
• Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers
  • From: Karl Malbrain
• Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers
  • From: Karl Malbrain
• Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers
  • From: Virgil
• Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers
  • From: Jesse F. Hughes
• Re: Shift-errors, recursive definitions
  • From: Jesse F. Hughes
• Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers
  • From: Phil
• Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers
  • From: Virgil
• Re: Help with proof in Gentzen's system NK
  • From: Keith Ramsay
• Re: Help with proof in Gentzen's system NK
  • From: Alan Smaill
• Re: Shift-errors, recursive definitions
  • From: Karl Malbrain
• Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers
  • From: Jesse F. Hughes
• Re: Shift-errors, recursive definitions
  • From: Jesse F. Hughes
• Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers
  • From: G . Frege
• Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers
  • From: Phil
• Re: Anybody read and understood A. Garciadiego, BERTRAND RUSSELL AND THE ORIGINS OF THE SET-THEORETIC PARADOXES ?
  • From: philneo2001
• Re: Shift-errors, recursive definitions
  • From: Karl Malbrain
• Re: Help with proof in Gentzen's system NK
  • From: Keith Ramsay
• Re: Shift-errors, recursive definitions
  • From: karl malbrain
• Re: Anybody read and understood A. Garciadiego, BERTRAND RUSSELL AND THE ORIGINS OF THE SET-THEORETIC PARADOXES ?
  • From: galathaea
• Re: Shift-errors, recursive definitions
  • From: george
• Re: Shift-errors, recursive definitions
  • From: george
• Re: Shift-errors, recursive definitions
  • From: george
• Re: Shift-errors, recursive definitions
  • From: george
• Any 400-line message is Phoolish
  • From: george
• Re: Shift-errors, recursive definitions
  • From: karl malbrain
• Re: Shift-errors, recursive definitions
  • From: karl malbrain
• Re: Shift-errors, recursive definitions
  • From: karl malbrain
• Re: Shift-errors, recursive definitions
  • From: karl malbrain
• Re: Shift-errors, recursive definitions
  • From: karl malbrain
• Re: Shift-errors, recursive definitions
  • From: karl malbrain
• Re: Shift-errors, recursive definitions
  • From: karl malbrain
• Re: Shift-errors, recursive definitions
  • From: karl malbrain
• Re: Shift-errors, recursive definitions
  • From: karl malbrain
• Re: Help with proof in Gentzen's system NK
  • From: Alan Smaill
• Re: Modal logic
  • From: Frederick Williams
• Re: Help with proof in Gentzen's system NK
  • From: Frederick Williams
• Re: Help with proof in Gentzen's system NK
  • From: Frederick Williams
• Re: Shift-errors, recursive definitions
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Shift-errors, recursive definitions
  • From: Jesse F. Hughes
• Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers
  • From: Aatu Koskensilta
• Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers
  • From: Aatu Koskensilta
• Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers
  • From: Aatu Koskensilta
• Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers
  • From: herbzet
• Re: Shift-errors, recursive definitions
  • From: Phil
• Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers
  • From: george
• Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers
  • From: george
• Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers
  • From: george
• Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers
  • From: G . Frege
• Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers
  • From: G . Frege
• Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers
  • From: Phil
• Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers
  • From: Lee Rudolph
• Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers
  • From: george
• Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers
  • From: Aatu Koskensilta
• Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers
  • From: george
• Re: Help with proof in Gentzen's system NK
  • From: Keith Ramsay
• Mathematica/ Curvus Job Opportunity in the Philadelphia Area
  • From: Marcella . Barker
• Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers
  • From: G . Frege
• Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers
  • From: george
• Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers
  • From: karl malbrain
• Re: Anybody read and understood A. Garciadiego, BERTRAND RUSSELL AND THE ORIGINS OF THE SET-THEORETIC PARADOXES ?
  • From: philneo2001
• Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers
  • From: Phil
• Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers
  • From: herbzet
• Modal logic
  • From: xuqiuhua
• Re: Contradiction or paradox
  • From: William Hale
• Re: Nomenclature question
  • From: J. Burse
• Re: Nomenclature question
  • From: Peter_Smith
• Re: Contradiction or paradox
  • From: Charlie-Boo
• Re: Contradiction or paradox
  • From: Charlie-Boo
• Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers
  • From: george
• Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers
  • From: george
• Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers
  • From: george
• Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers
  • From: george
• Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers
  • From: george
• Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers
  • From: george
• Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers
  • From: karl malbrain
• Nomenclature question
  • From: Colin
• Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers
  • From: karl malbrain
• Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers
  • From: karl malbrain
• Re: Anti-diagonalist page
  • From: Frederick Williams
• Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers
  • From: Phil
• Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers
  • From: Phil
• Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers
  • From: Phil
• Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers
  • From: Phil
• Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers
  • From: Phil
• Re: Contradiction or paradox
  • From: William Hale
• Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers
  • From: MoeBlee
• Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers
  • From: george
• Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers
  • From: MoeBlee
• Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers
  • From: george
• Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers
  • From: MoeBlee
• Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers
  • From: george
• Re: Contradiction or paradox
  • From: Charlie-Boo
• Re: Contradiction or paradox
  • From: Charlie-Boo
• Re: Contradiction or paradox
  • From: Charlie-Boo
• Re: Definition please
  • From: J P
• Re: Minimal set theory for model theory?
  • From: LauLuna
• Re: Phool doesn't know his limits
  • From: karl malbrain
• Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers
  • From: george
• Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers
  • From: george
• Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers
  • From: george
• Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers
  • From: george
• Re: Descriptions, Presuppositions, Liar...
  • From: David C . Ullrich
• Re: Minimal set theory for model theory?
  • From: Aatu Koskensilta
• Re: Minimal set theory for model theory?
  • From: Keith Ramsay
• Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers
  • From: Phil
• Phool doesn't know his limits
  • From: george
• Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers
  • From: Karl Malbrain
• Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers
  • From: Phil
• Re: Descriptions, Presuppositions, Liar...
  • From: Newberry
• Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers
  • From: MoeBlee
• Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers
  • From: karl malbrain
• [FAQ, 06/11/05] Mathematical logic on the web
  • From: Boris 'pi' Piwinger
• Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers
  • From: george
• Phool phails to understand the difference between a predicate and a term
  • From: george
• Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers
  • From: MoeBlee
• Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers
  • From: george
• Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers
  • From: karl malbrain
• Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers
  • From: george
• Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers
  • From: karl malbrain
• Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers
  • From: Virgil
• Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers
  • From: Phil

We are proud to have Web Hosting and Rack Housing from 9 Net Avenue Deutschland.
(13)