Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers
- From: G. Frege <nomail@invalid>
- Date: Sat, 05 May 2007 14:29:32 +0200
On Sat, 05 May 2007 09:11:59 GMT, Phil <toob-headman@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
If you weren't the idiot you are, you might notice that * is an
Now, if anyone can PROVE that whenever x is in N, then 2*x is in N,
then you have a true PROOF that N and E are equinumerous.
operation which can be (and is) defined in set theory, such that
n*m in N for all n,m e N. Since 2 e N this implies that 2*n in N
for all n e N.
If you are curious, * is defined the following way:
(a) n * 0 = 0
(b) n * m' = n * m + n
No-one (other than you) suggests that the claim "this is obvious"
However, simply claiming that "this is obvious" is not adequate [...]
is an adequate replacement for an explicit mathematical proof.
Actually, WE all know that
"Unproven statements carry little weight in the world
of mathematics." (Amir D. Aczel)
F.
For more information see:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/natural_numbers
--
E-mail: info<at>simple-line<dot>de
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers
- From: george
- Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers
- From: Virgil
- Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers
- References:
- Prev by Date: Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers
- Next by Date: Re: Shift-errors, recursive definitions
- Previous by thread: Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers
- Next by thread: Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers
- Index(es):