Re: Contradiction or paradox
- From: MoeBlee <jazzmobe@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 18 May 2007 10:13:17 -0700
On May 18, 4:12 am, Charlie-Boo <shymath...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On May 17, 11:19 pm, MoeBlee <jazzm...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Your mindless and irresponsible claims about Norm
Megill's system is another example.
If you want to debate that system, it would help to start a new
thread. He uses an expression like xRy(Rz)=(xRy)Rz and substitutes +
for R but there is nothing at that point about + or - so - could
equally well be substituted for R.
Silly boy, there is an hypothesis of that theorem that you have not
shown is satisfied by subtraction. That has been pointed out to you
already by a few other posters.
There is also the general question of what ZFC alone can prove and
what he says regarding that question and what his site shows.
You don't know what ZFC is.
MoeBlee
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Contradiction or paradox
- From: Charlie-Boo
- Re: Contradiction or paradox
- References:
- Re: Contradiction or paradox
- From: Charlie-Boo
- Re: Contradiction or paradox
- From: translogi
- Re: Contradiction or paradox
- From: Charlie-Boo
- Re: Contradiction or paradox
- From: Jesse F. Hughes
- Re: Contradiction or paradox
- From: MoeBlee
- Re: Contradiction or paradox
- From: Charlie-Boo
- Re: Contradiction or paradox
- From: MoeBlee
- Re: Contradiction or paradox
- From: Charlie-Boo
- Re: Contradiction or paradox
- From: MoeBlee
- Re: Contradiction or paradox
- From: Charlie-Boo
- Re: Contradiction or paradox
- From: MoeBlee
- Re: Contradiction or paradox
- From: Charlie-Boo
- Re: Contradiction or paradox
- From: MoeBlee
- Re: Contradiction or paradox
- From: Charlie-Boo
- Re: Contradiction or paradox
- Prev by Date: Re: Contradiction or paradox
- Next by Date: Re: Contradiction or paradox
- Previous by thread: Re: Contradiction or paradox
- Next by thread: Re: Contradiction or paradox
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading