Re: Can We Quantify over Everything?
- From: LauLuna <laureanoluna@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: 22 May 2007 06:58:39 -0700
On May 21, 12:20 am, Peter_Smith <p...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Can We Quantify over Everything?
Sure. Just consider our /universe of discourse/ to consist of
"everything". Then "Ax" would comprise _everything_.
Well, its not as simple as *that*, or else Augustin Rayo and Gabriel
Uzquiano wouldn't have recently edited a fascinating OUP book of a
dozen essays by front-rank logicians vigorously debating the issue.
For a start, we might wonder here about the notion of a universe of
discourse: the usual textbook definition of a universe of discourse
treats it as a set -- but there are familiar problems about the idea
of a set which contains everything (e.g. all the ordinals ...).
====================
logicmatters.blogspot.com
Most probably you are referring to the book 'Absolute Generality',
whose introduction can be found at http://web.mit.edu/arayo/www/Introduction.pdf
Regards
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Can We Quantify over Everything?
- From: Peter_Smith
- Re: Can We Quantify over Everything?
- References:
- Re: Can We Quantify over Everything?
- From: G . Frege
- Re: Can We Quantify over Everything?
- From: Peter_Smith
- Re: Can We Quantify over Everything?
- Prev by Date: Re: Can We Quantify over Everything?
- Next by Date: Re: Can We Quantify over Everything?
- Previous by thread: Re: Can We Quantify over Everything?
- Next by thread: Re: Can We Quantify over Everything?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|