Re: Contradiction or paradox
- From: Charlie-Boo <shymathguy@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 22 May 2007 20:40:37 -0700
On May 20, 11:19 am, G. Frege <nomail@invalid> wrote:
On 20 May 2007 08:17:16 -0700, Charlie-Boo <shymath...@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
Where is the point where Metamath shows that + qualifies when
+ is substituted for R?
Again asking OTHERS to do YOUR homework?
Who assigned it to me?
You know, C-B, you are a pain in the ass.
As Katie Curic said recently, "Then you should take a suppository."
It's called "gadfly." :)
The obligation is to the principles of Mathematics, not to any
particular Mathematician such as myself. Absent such a demonstration,
one cannot honestly make a particular assertion. Since I do not make
that assertion, that principle does not impede me!
As far as "idiot" goes, what were your college board SAT scores,
Frege?
C-B
X: "Am I a gadfly?"
Chester: "Nothing wrong with being a gadfly."
F.
--
E-mail: info<at>simple-line<dot>de
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Contradiction or paradox
- From: MoeBlee
- Re: Contradiction or paradox
- References:
- Re: Contradiction or paradox
- From: Charlie-Boo
- Re: Contradiction or paradox
- From: MoeBlee
- Re: Contradiction or paradox
- From: Charlie-Boo
- Re: Contradiction or paradox
- From: MoeBlee
- Re: Contradiction or paradox
- From: David C . Ullrich
- Re: Contradiction or paradox
- From: Charlie-Boo
- Re: Contradiction or paradox
- From: MoeBlee
- Re: Contradiction or paradox
- From: Charlie-Boo
- Re: Contradiction or paradox
- From: G . Frege
- Re: Contradiction or paradox
- Prev by Date: Call For Participation: WORLDCOMP'07: joint conferences in CS, CE, and applied computing, June 25-28, 2007, Las Vegas
- Next by Date: Re: An exercise in set theory: How high do we get by autonomously iterating the powerset operation?
- Previous by thread: Re: Contradiction or paradox
- Next by thread: Re: Contradiction or paradox
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|