Re: Formalizing the Fundamental Theorem of Arithmetic
- From: Charlie-Boo <shymathguy@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 24 May 2007 18:16:33 -0700
On May 23, 6:07 pm, G. Frege <nomail@invalid> wrote:
On 23 May 2007 14:59:51 -0700, mmwe...@xxxxxx wrote:
I was wondering how to state the Fundamental Theorem of Arithmetic in
First-order Logic.
There is a reason why standard math (usually) is performed without
using a completely formalized language... ;-)
Math is formal by definition. If you can't state it in FOL then FOL
is fucked up.
C-B
F.
P.S.
Of course, ELEMENTS from FOPL (quantifiers, variables and =) and
set theoretic notations are rather helpful when formulating some
mathematical facts.
--
E-mail: info<at>simple-line<dot>de
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Formalizing the Fundamental Theorem of Arithmetic
- From: MoeBlee
- Re: Formalizing the Fundamental Theorem of Arithmetic
- From: Jesse F. Hughes
- Re: Formalizing the Fundamental Theorem of Arithmetic
- References:
- Formalizing the Fundamental Theorem of Arithmetic
- From: mmweiss
- Re: Formalizing the Fundamental Theorem of Arithmetic
- From: G . Frege
- Formalizing the Fundamental Theorem of Arithmetic
- Prev by Date: Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers
- Next by Date: Re: Prize Announced for Determining the Boundaries of Turing Machine Computation
- Previous by thread: Re: Formalizing the Fundamental Theorem of Arithmetic
- Next by thread: Re: Formalizing the Fundamental Theorem of Arithmetic
- Index(es):