Re: Answer "how to prove ~(P <--> Q) |- ~P <-->Q "
- From: George Dance <georgedance04@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: 28 May 2007 05:00:24 -0700
On May 25, 10:37 pm, Conbra <s...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Answer one question
At google group sci.logic one person asks a question "How do you prove
~(P <--> Q) |- ~P <--> Q using natural deduction?". Not only the
relation [~(P <--> Q) |- ~P <--> Q] could be proved on concept
algebra, but also the relation [~P <--> Q |-~(P <--> Q)] could be
proved.
"how to prove ~(P<->Q) |- ~P<-> Q "?
Proof in a Copi-style system:
1. ~(P <-> Q)
2. ~((P -> Q) & (Q -> P)) 1 Equiv1
3. ~(P -> Q) v ~(Q -> P) 2 DeM
4. ~(~P v Q) v ~(~Q v P) 3 Impl
5. (~~P & ~Q) v (~~Q & ~P) 4 DeM
6. (~~P & ~Q) v (Q & ~P) 5 DN
7. (Q & ~P) v (~~P & ~Q) 6 Comm
8. (~P & Q) v (~~P & ~Q) 7 Comm
9. ~P <-> Q 8 Equiv2
That is to say the relation [~(P <--> Q) = ~P <--> Q] could be
proved on concept algebra. At this article we are going to prove the
late relation on concept algebra.
Full text see following webhttp://blog.tom.com/blog/read.php?blogid=62728&bloggerid=762122
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Answer "how to prove ~(P <--> Q) |- ~P <-->Q "
- From: herbzet
- Re: Answer "how to prove ~(P <--> Q) |- ~P <-->Q "
- From: Frederick Williams
- Re: Answer "how to prove ~(P <--> Q) |- ~P <-->Q "
- From: George Dance
- Re: Answer "how to prove ~(P <--> Q) |- ~P <-->Q "
- References:
- Answer "how to prove ~(P <--> Q) |- ~P <-->Q "
- From: Conbra
- Answer "how to prove ~(P <--> Q) |- ~P <-->Q "
- Prev by Date: Re: Prize Announced for Determining the Boundaries of Turing Machine Computation
- Next by Date: Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers
- Previous by thread: Re: Answer "how to prove ~(P <--> Q) |- ~P <-->Q "
- Next by thread: Re: Answer "how to prove ~(P <--> Q) |- ~P <-->Q "
- Index(es):