Re: Answer "how to prove ~(P <--> Q) |- ~P <-->Q "
- From: George Dance <georgedance04@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 02 Jun 2007 07:50:48 -0700
On Jun 1, 10:37 pm, herbzet <herb...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
"Jesse F. Hughes" wrote:
herbzet writes:
My copy doesn't have CP. What is CP?
Conditional proof (sometimes called -> intro).
Assume P. Derive Q. Conclude P -> Q.
Thank you.
IIRC, the system Copi used in the first edition of his book on prop
logic didn't have a CP rule, and was proven to be incomplete. He used
a different rule set in the second edition.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Answer "how to prove ~(P <--> Q) |- ~P <-->Q "
- From: herbzet
- Re: Answer "how to prove ~(P <--> Q) |- ~P <-->Q "
- From: herbzet
- Re: Answer "how to prove ~(P <--> Q) |- ~P <-->Q "
- References:
- Re: Answer "how to prove ~(P <--> Q) |- ~P <-->Q "
- From: herbzet
- Re: Answer "how to prove ~(P <--> Q) |- ~P <-->Q "
- From: Jesse F. Hughes
- Re: Answer "how to prove ~(P <--> Q) |- ~P <-->Q "
- From: herbzet
- Re: Answer "how to prove ~(P <--> Q) |- ~P <-->Q "
- Prev by Date: Seeking Leibniz reference.
- Next by Date: Re: Cantor's circular "proof" that evens = integers
- Previous by thread: Re: Answer "how to prove ~(P <--> Q) |- ~P <-->Q "
- Next by thread: Re: Answer "how to prove ~(P <--> Q) |- ~P <-->Q "
- Index(es):