Re: Request for Review of ZF Inconsistency Proof

On Jun 5, 5:13 pm, MoeBlee <jazzm...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Jun 5, 5:02 pm, Aatu Koskensilta <aatu.koskensi...@xxxxxxxxx>

Perhaps -- not that it is any business of mine --
that might suggest it's entirely pointless to explain, explicate, show
stuff to the idiotic individuals?

In the case of the most entrenched cranks, such posts to them are
pointless if the expectation is that of getting through to them. But
one may have one's own reasons for such seemingly unrewarding posting
to cranks, which - as with any such endeavor, habit, or vice - are not
necessarily so very rational in terms of expectations of particular
outcomes.

P.S. I didn't say, even suggest, or even assent that he's an idiot.

MoeBlee


.

Quantcast