Re: Request for Review of ZF Inconsistency Proof
- From: Aatu Koskensilta <aatu.koskensilta@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2007 23:30:09 GMT
On 2007-06-05, in sci.logic, Scott wrote:
Yes, I did notice all your arguments are in prose and not the formal
language of set theory.
Why would anyone be interested in tediosuly detailed formulations in the
language of set theory? Sheer perversity?
--
Aatu Koskensilta (aatu.koskensilta@xxxxxxxxx)
"Wovon man nicht sprechen kann, daruber muss man schweigen"
- Ludwig Wittgenstein, Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Request for Review of ZF Inconsistency Proof
- From: MoeBlee
- Re: Request for Review of ZF Inconsistency Proof
- References:
- Request for Review of ZF Inconsistency Proof
- From: Scott
- Re: Request for Review of ZF Inconsistency Proof
- From: Scott
- Re: Request for Review of ZF Inconsistency Proof
- From: Arturo Magidin
- Re: Request for Review of ZF Inconsistency Proof
- From: Scott
- Re: Request for Review of ZF Inconsistency Proof
- From: Arturo Magidin
- Re: Request for Review of ZF Inconsistency Proof
- From: Scott
- Re: Request for Review of ZF Inconsistency Proof
- From: Jesse F. Hughes
- Re: Request for Review of ZF Inconsistency Proof
- From: Scott
- Re: Request for Review of ZF Inconsistency Proof
- From: MoeBlee
- Re: Request for Review of ZF Inconsistency Proof
- From: Scott
- Request for Review of ZF Inconsistency Proof
- Prev by Date: Re: Request for Review of ZF Inconsistency Proof
- Next by Date: Re: Request for Review of ZF Inconsistency Proof
- Previous by thread: Re: Request for Review of ZF Inconsistency Proof
- Next by thread: Re: Request for Review of ZF Inconsistency Proof
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|