Re: Request for Review of ZF Inconsistency Proof
- From: Aatu Koskensilta <aatu.koskensilta@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 06 Jun 2007 07:10:56 GMT
On 2007-06-06, in sci.logic, MoeBlee wrote:
Oh come now [that's one I'm borrowing from you know who], I didn't say
it's evil.
Doing as Scott did is, if not evil, at least somewhat silly. I'm afraid he
has revealed himself as a second class mathematical crank. As you reminded
me, he's had some interesting things to say about Gödel, incompleteness,
inconsistency, in the past, too.
In the case of the most entrenched cranks, such posts to them are
pointless if the expectation is that of getting through to them. But
one may have one's own reasons for such seemingly unrewarding posting
to cranks, which - as with any such endeavor, habit, or vice - are not
necessarily so very rational in terms of expectations of particular
outcomes.
True. Hanging out on Usenet is in itself a somewhat queer hobby.
--
Aatu Koskensilta (aatu.koskensilta@xxxxxxxxx)
"Wovon man nicht sprechen kann, daruber muss man schweigen"
- Ludwig Wittgenstein, Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus
.
- References:
- Request for Review of ZF Inconsistency Proof
- From: Scott
- Re: Request for Review of ZF Inconsistency Proof
- From: Scott
- Re: Request for Review of ZF Inconsistency Proof
- From: Arturo Magidin
- Re: Request for Review of ZF Inconsistency Proof
- From: Scott
- Re: Request for Review of ZF Inconsistency Proof
- From: Arturo Magidin
- Re: Request for Review of ZF Inconsistency Proof
- From: Scott
- Re: Request for Review of ZF Inconsistency Proof
- From: Jesse F. Hughes
- Re: Request for Review of ZF Inconsistency Proof
- From: Scott
- Re: Request for Review of ZF Inconsistency Proof
- From: MoeBlee
- Re: Request for Review of ZF Inconsistency Proof
- From: Scott
- Re: Request for Review of ZF Inconsistency Proof
- From: Aatu Koskensilta
- Re: Request for Review of ZF Inconsistency Proof
- From: MoeBlee
- Re: Request for Review of ZF Inconsistency Proof
- From: Aatu Koskensilta
- Re: Request for Review of ZF Inconsistency Proof
- From: MoeBlee
- Request for Review of ZF Inconsistency Proof
- Prev by Date: Re: Formalisation
- Next by Date: Re: Formalisation
- Previous by thread: Re: Request for Review of ZF Inconsistency Proof
- Next by thread: Re: Request for Review of ZF Inconsistency Proof
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|