Re: PARADISE LOST: Debunking Cantor's theory
- From: Virgil <virgil@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 07 Jun 2007 21:55:23 -0600
In article <slrnf6g5p8.t8t.aatu.koskensilta@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
Aatu Koskensilta <aatu.koskensilta@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 2007-06-07, in sci.logic, Jesse F. Hughes wrote:
Either you mean that *if* Goldbach's conjecture is false, then it is
possible (in some idealised sense) to refute it... or you're holding
out on us.
I will soon be launching a decades lasting project of posting my proofs of
Goldbach's conjecture on Usenet, in a valiant attempt to expose the corrupt
nature of the mathematical establishment.
Sounds remarkably like JSH.
.
- References:
- Re: PARADISE LOST: Debunking Cantor's theory
- From: Jesse F. Hughes
- Re: PARADISE LOST: Debunking Cantor's theory
- From: Aatu Koskensilta
- Re: PARADISE LOST: Debunking Cantor's theory
- Prev by Date: Call For Participation: WORLDCOMP'07: joint conferences in CS, CE, and applied computing, June 25-28, 2007, Las Vegas
- Next by Date: Re: PARADISE LOST: Debunking Cantor's theory
- Previous by thread: Re: PARADISE LOST: Debunking Cantor's theory
- Next by thread: Re: PARADISE LOST: Debunking Cantor's theory
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|