sci.logic

• Date Index

• Question: Given |X|>0 and |Y|>0, can X x Y be empty?, Scott
  • Re: Question: Given |X|>0 and |Y|>0, can X x Y be empty?, poopdeville
  • Re: Question: Given |X|>0 and |Y|>0, can X x Y be empty?, Arturo Magidin
• Wittgenstein lived here, abo
  • Re: Wittgenstein lived here, abo
• symbols for variables?, wordwise
  • Re: symbols for variables?, William Elliot
  • Re: symbols for variables?, herbzet
  • Re: symbols for variables?, LauLuna
• Re: your ad:::::::: FREE Satellite TV on your PC - Download Now!, hueyD
• Need help, Jasonkruse
  • Re: Need help, translogi
• Godel's Theorem and Model Theory, poopdeville
  • Re: Godel's Theorem and Model Theory, Newberry
  • Re: Godel's Theorem and Model Theory, Newberry
    • Re: Godel's Theorem and Model Theory, MoeBlee
    • Re: Godel's Theorem and Model Theory, Daryl McCullough
      • Re: Godel's Theorem and Model Theory, Newberry
      • Re: Godel's Theorem and Model Theory, george
      • Re: Godel's Theorem and Model Theory, Newberry
      • Re: Godel's Theorem and Model Theory, MoeBlee
      • Re: Godel's Theorem and Model Theory, Daryl McCullough
      • Re: Godel's Theorem and Model Theory, Newberry
      • Re: Godel's Theorem and Model Theory, george
      • Re: Godel's Theorem and Model Theory, Daryl McCullough
      • Re: Godel's Theorem and Model Theory, MoeBlee
      • Re: Godel's Theorem and Model Theory, Newberry
      • Re: Godel's Theorem and Model Theory, george
      • Re: Godel's Theorem and Model Theory, Daryl McCullough
      • Re: Godel's Theorem and Model Theory, george
      • Re: Godel's Theorem and Model Theory, Daryl McCullough
      • Re: Godel's Theorem and Model Theory, Newberry
      • Re: Godel's Theorem and Model Theory, MoeBlee
      • Re: Godel's Theorem and Model Theory, Daryl McCullough
      • Re: Godel's Theorem and Model Theory, george
      • Re: Godel's Theorem and Model Theory, MoeBlee
      • Re: Godel's Theorem and Model Theory, LauLuna
      • Re: Godel's Theorem and Model Theory, Newberry
      • Re: Godel's Theorem and Model Theory, LauLuna
  • Re: Godel's Theorem and Model Theory, Rupert
  • Re: Godel's Theorem and Model Theory, herbzet
  • Re: Godel's Theorem and Model Theory, george
    • Re: Godel's Theorem and Model Theory, herbzet
    • Message not available
      • Re: Godel's Theorem and Model Theory, herbzet
    • Message not available
      • Re: Godel's Theorem and Model Theory, poopdeville
  • Message not available
    • Re: Godel's Theorem and Model Theory, Daryl McCullough
      • Re: Godel's Theorem and Model Theory, Nam D. Nguyen
      • Re: Godel's Theorem and Model Theory, george
• Question: What conditions are sufficient to prove a subset does not exist?, Scott
  • Re: Question: What conditions are sufficient to prove a subset does not exist?, G . Frege
  • Re: Question: What conditions are sufficient to prove a subset does not exist?, Arturo Magidin
  • Re: Question: What conditions are sufficient to prove a subset does not exist?, Virgil
    • Re: Question: What conditions are sufficient to prove a subset does not exist?, Scott
      • Re: Question: What conditions are sufficient to prove a subset does not exist?, Arturo Magidin
      • Re: Question: What conditions are sufficient to prove a subset does not exist?, Scott
      • Re: Question: What conditions are sufficient to prove a subset does not exist?, Arturo Magidin
      • Re: Question: What conditions are sufficient to prove a subset does not exist?, Scott
      • Re: Question: What conditions are sufficient to prove a subset does not exist?, Arturo Magidin
      • Re: Question: What conditions are sufficient to prove a subset does not exist?, Scott
  • Re: Question: What conditions are sufficient to prove a subset does not exist?, LauLuna
    • Re: Question: What conditions are sufficient to prove a subset does not exist?, Scott
      • Re: Question: What conditions are sufficient to prove a subset does not exist?, Arturo Magidin
      • Re: Question: What conditions are sufficient to prove a subset does not exist?, Scott
      • Re: Question: What conditions are sufficient to prove a subset does not exist?, Arturo Magidin
      • Re: Question: What conditions are sufficient to prove a subset does not exist?, Virgil
      • Re: Question: What conditions are sufficient to prove a subset does not exist?, Scott
      • Re: Question: What conditions are sufficient to prove a subset does not exist?, Arturo Magidin
      • Re: Question: What conditions are sufficient to prove a subset does not exist?, Scott
      • Re: Question: What conditions are sufficient to prove a subset does not exist?, Arturo Magidin
      • Re: Question: What conditions are sufficient to prove a subset does not exist?, Scott
      • Re: Question: What conditions are sufficient to prove a subset does not exist?, Arturo Magidin
      • Re: Question: What conditions are sufficient to prove a subset does not exist?, Scott
      • Re: Question: What conditions are sufficient to prove a subset does not exist?, george
      • Re: Question: What conditions are sufficient to prove a subset does not exist?, Virgil
      • Re: Question: What conditions are sufficient to prove a subset does not exist?, george
      • Re: Question: What conditions are sufficient to prove a subset does not exist?, Scott
      • Re: Question: What conditions are sufficient to prove a subset does not exist?, LauLuna
      • Re: Question: What conditions are sufficient to prove a subset does not exist?, Scott
      • Re: Question: What conditions are sufficient to prove a subset does not exist?, Arturo Magidin
      • Re: Question: What conditions are sufficient to prove a subset does not exist?, george
      • Re: Question: What conditions are sufficient to prove a subset does not exist?, Scott
      • Re: Question: What conditions are sufficient to prove a subset does not exist?, george
      • Re: Question: What conditions are sufficient to prove a subset does not exist?, george
      • Re: Question: What conditions are sufficient to prove a subset does not exist?, Scott
      • Re: Question: What conditions are sufficient to prove a subset does not exist?, Jesse F. Hughes
      • Re: Question: What conditions are sufficient to prove a subset does not exist?, george
      • Re: Question: What conditions are sufficient to prove a subset does not exist?, george
      • Re: Question: What conditions are sufficient to prove a subset does not exist?, Scott
      • Re: Question: What conditions are sufficient to prove a subset does not exist?, LauLuna
      • Re: Question: What conditions are sufficient to prove a subset does not exist?, Scott
      • Re: Question: What conditions are sufficient to prove a subset does not exist?, Jesse F. Hughes
  • Re: Question: What conditions are sufficient to prove a subset does not exist?, Owen
  • Re: Question: What conditions are sufficient to prove a subset does not exist?, george
    • Re: Question: What conditions are sufficient to prove a subset does not exist?, Virgil
• Request for information about functions, Scott
  • Re: Request for information about functions, J. Burse
  • Re: Request for information about functions, Arturo Magidin
    • Re: Request for information about functions, J. Burse
      • Re: Request for information about functions, Arturo Magidin
      • Re: Request for information about functions, Arturo Magidin
      • Re: Request for information about functions, J. Burse
      • Re: Request for information about functions, Arturo Magidin
      • Re: Request for information about functions, J. Burse
      • Re: Request for information about functions, Arturo Magidin
      • Re: Request for information about functions, J. Burse
      • Re: Request for information about functions, Arturo Magidin
      • Re: Request for information about functions, J. Burse
      • Re: Request for information about functions, Arturo Magidin
      • Re: Request for information about functions, J. Burse
      • Re: Request for information about functions, J. Burse
      • Re: Request for information about functions, Arturo Magidin
      • Re: Request for information about functions, Arturo Magidin
  • Re: Request for information about functions, G . Frege
    • Re: Request for information about functions, Scott
• Einstein’s mathematical excellence and Newton’s insightful perception of mass- energy inter conversion, fleesow
• necessarily true, Mark-T
  • Re: necessarily true, William Elliot
  • Re: necessarily true, Frederick Williams
    • Re: necessarily true, Mark-T
      • Re: necessarily true, William Elliot
      • Re: necessarily true, Frederick Williams
      • Re: necessarily true, J. Burse
      • Re: necessarily true, Frederick Williams
      • Re: necessarily true, J. Burse
• Who could draw the conclusions from Aristotle's four propositions?, Conbra
  • Re: Who could draw the conclusions from Aristotle's four propositions?, William Elliot
  • Re: Who could draw the conclusions from Aristotle's four propositions?, Frederick Williams
  • Re: Who could draw the conclusions from Aristotle's four propositions?, J. Burse
    • Re: Who could draw the conclusions from Aristotle's four propositions?, Frederick Williams
      • Re: Who could draw the conclusions from Aristotle's four propositions?, J. Burse
    • Re: Who could draw the conclusions from Aristotle's four propositions?, J. Burse
      • Re: Who could draw the conclusions from Aristotle's four propositions?, herbzet
      • Re: Who could draw the conclusions from Aristotle's four propositions?, J. Burse
      • Re: Who could draw the conclusions from Aristotle's four propositions?, herbzet
      • Re: Who could draw the conclusions from Aristotle's four propositions?, J. Burse
      • Re: Who could draw the conclusions from Aristotle's four propositions?, J. Burse
      • Re: Who could draw the conclusions from Aristotle's four propositions?, J. Burse
  • Re: Who could draw the conclusions from Aristotle's four propositions?, Conbra
    • Re: Who could draw the conclusions from Aristotle's four propositions?, Conbra
      • Re: Who could draw the conclusions from Aristotle's four propositions?, Conbra
      • Re: Who could draw the conclusions from Aristotle's four propositions?, Conbra
      • Re: Who could draw the conclusions from Aristotle's four propositions?, Conbra
  • Re: Who could draw the conclusions from Aristotle's four propositions?, Dan Christensen
    • Re: Who could draw the conclusions from Aristotle's four propositions?, J. Burse
      • Re: Who could draw the conclusions from Aristotle's four propositions?, Dan Christensen
      • Re: Who could draw the conclusions from Aristotle's four propositions?, herbzet
      • Re: Who could draw the conclusions from Aristotle's four propositions?, Conbra
      • Re: Who could draw the conclusions from Aristotle's four propositions?, J. Burse
      • Re: Who could draw the conclusions from Aristotle's four propositions?, Conbra
• Who could explain the Aristotle's four propositions???, Conbra
  • Re: Who could explain the Aristotle's four propositions???, William Elliot
• Our Heavenly Mother on 9-14-96, eridianne
• cd writer, abbasfarhood63
  • Re: cd writer, Frederick Williams
    • Re: cd writer, Frederick Williams
• Re: Sir Isaac Newton, has originated, inter-conversion of mass and energy, (E=mc2 ), Frederick Williams
• mendelson: proof A1 + A2 + A3' => A3, Jörg Sommer
• The point of ur-elements, Aatu Koskensilta
  • Question about extensions of PA, Herman Jurjus
    • Re: Question about extensions of PA, Aatu Koskensilta
      • Re: Question about extensions of PA, Herman Jurjus
      • Re: Question about extensions of PA, Herman Jurjus
      • Re: Question about extensions of PA, Herman Jurjus
  • Re: The point of ur-elements, Peter_Smith
    • Re: The point of ur-elements, Aatu Koskensilta
      • Re: The point of ur-elements, Peter_Smith
      • Re: The point of ur-elements, Pierre Asselin
      • Re: The point of ur-elements, Zaljohar
  • Re: The point of ur-elements, Daryl McCullough
    • Re: The point of ur-elements, Aatu Koskensilta
      • Re: The point of ur-elements, guskz
  • Re: The point of ur-elements, Mitch
  • Re: The point of ur-elements, G . Frege
    • Re: The point of ur-elements, G . Frege
  • Re: The point of ur-elements, galathaea
    • Re: The point of ur-elements, Daryl McCullough
      • Re: The point of ur-elements, Frederick Williams
      • Re: The point of ur-elements, guskz
      • Re: The point of ur-elements, galathaea
    • Re: The point of ur-elements, herbzet
• Deadly snale venom, thestew
• What is meaning of Aristotle proposition "A belongs to all B". Does it equal to A = B?, Conbra
  • Re: What is meaning of Aristotle proposition "A belongs to all B". Does it equal to A = B?, William Elliot
    • Re: What is meaning of Aristotle proposition "A belongs to all B". Does it equal to A = B?, G . Frege
      • Re: What is meaning of Aristotle proposition "A belongs to all B". Does it equal to A = B?, William Elliot
      • Re: What is meaning of Aristotle proposition "A belongs to all B". Does it equal to A = B?, G . Frege
      • Re: What is meaning of Aristotle proposition "A belongs to all B". Does it equal to A = B?, William Elliot
      • Re: What is meaning of Aristotle proposition "A belongs to all B". Does it equal to A = B?, G . Frege
      • Re: What is meaning of Aristotle proposition "A belongs to all B". Does it equal to A = B?, William Elliot
      • Re: What is meaning of Aristotle proposition "A belongs to all B". Does it equal to A = B?, G . Frege
      • Re: What is meaning of Aristotle proposition "A belongs to all B". Does it equal to A = B?, Owen
      • Re: What is meaning of Aristotle proposition "A belongs to all B". Does it equal to A = B?, Frederick Williams
    • Re: What is meaning of Aristotle proposition "A belongs to all B". Does it equal to A = B?, Conbra
      • Re: What is meaning of Aristotle proposition "A belongs to all B". Does it equal to A = B?, Frederick Williams
• The science of Truth based on the Light of the World !, Caesar J. B. Squitti
• الزوجه البارده, الحلوة
• The most minimal injective function., Zaljohar
  • Re: The most minimal injective function., J. Burse
• EXTENDED DEADLINE; K-CAP 2007 WORKSHOP: Knowledge Capture and Constraint Programming (KCCP-07), jdokas@xxxxxxxxx
• modal scope fallacy, michalchik@xxxxxxx
  • Re: modal scope fallacy, Frederick Williams
    • Re: modal scope fallacy, michalchik@xxxxxxx
      • Re: modal scope fallacy, michalchik@xxxxxxx
      • Re: modal scope fallacy, Frederick Williams
      • Re: modal scope fallacy, michalchik@xxxxxxx
      • Re: modal scope fallacy, Peter_Smith
  • Re: modal scope fallacy, Ken Pledger
• Quickie question, jd
  • Re: Quickie question, MoeBlee
  • Re: Quickie question, Jack Campin - bogus address
• Re: really basic problem with universal quantifier, free variables and generalisation., Frederick Williams
  • Message not available
    • Re: really basic problem with universal quantifier, free variables and generalisation., Peter_Smith
      • Message not available
      • Re: really basic problem with universal quantifier, free variables and generalisation., J. Burse
      • Message not available
      • Re: really basic problem with universal quantifier, free variables and generalisation., J. Burse
      • Message not available
      • Re: really basic problem with universal quantifier, free variables and generalisation., Frederick Williams
      • Message not available
      • Re: really basic problem with universal quantifier, free variables and generalisation., J. Burse
      • Re: really basic problem with universal quantifier, free variablesand generalisation., Frederick Williams
      • Re: really basic problem with universal quantifier, free variablesand generalisation., J. Burse
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: really basic problem with universal quantifier, free variables and generalisation., george
    • Message not available
      • Re: really basic problem with universal quantifier, free variables and generalisation., David C . Ullrich
      • Re: really basic problem with universal quantifier, free variables and generalisation., Peter_Smith
      • Message not available
      • Re: really basic problem with universal quantifier, free variables and generalisation., george
      • Message not available
      • Re: really basic problem with universal quantifier, free variables and generalisation., David C . Ullrich
      • Re: really basic problem with universal quantifier, free variables and generalisation., Frederick Williams
• If your understanding of God is dead try mine., socratus
  • Re: If your understanding of God is dead try mine., Frederick Williams
• Axiom schema of Hyperfinity, Zaljohar
  • Re: Axiom schema of Hyperfinity, Pierre Asselin
• book help!!!, antoniapnv
  • Re: book help!!!, Frederick Williams
    • Re: book help!!!, Frederick Williams
• Looking for a Scholarship or Loan (Its here), Bushra
• 7/7/07 "Working in Faith", 2Barter.net
  • Re: 7/7/07 "Working in Faith", Frederick Williams
• Make money easily, samitharansara
• Request help in understanding levels., Scott
  • Re: Request help in understanding levels., G . Frege
    • Re: Request help in understanding levels., Frederick Williams
    • Re: Request help in understanding levels., Scott
  • Re: Request help in understanding levels., MoeBlee
    • Re: Request help in understanding levels., MoeBlee
    • Re: Request help in understanding levels., MoeBlee
    • Re: Request help in understanding levels., Scott
      • Re: Request help in understanding levels., MoeBlee
      • Re: Request help in understanding levels., Scott
      • Re: Request help in understanding levels., MoeBlee
      • Re: Request help in understanding levels., Scott
      • Re: Request help in understanding levels., MoeBlee
      • Re: Request help in understanding levels., MoeBlee
      • Re: Request help in understanding levels., Keith Ramsay
  • Re: Request help in understanding levels., Keith Ramsay
• Math Equation Help!, DigMar
  • Re: Math Equation Help!, Ken Pledger
    • Re: Math Equation Help!, DigMar
• ABRIDGED ETERNITY EQUATION, SUPERMAX
• QUANTUM DETERMINISM, SUPERMAX
• Set size and Cardinality., Zaljohar
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Set size and Cardinality., Zaljohar
• Re: yourdocumentsource janrom...@gmail.com Phony comments, janrom
• On the randomness of ordered subsets of the digits of PI, Edward Grefenstette
  • Re: On the randomness of ordered subsets of the digits of PI, Frederick Williams
    • Re: On the randomness of ordered subsets of the digits of PI, Dave L. Renfro
• Burning Rope Timer, Plexer
• Infinitesmal Arithmatic II, herbzet
• Re: Logic, herbzet
• Re: Question?, David C . Ullrich
• Re: Peano's Axioms, Bill Taylor
  • Re: Peano's Axioms, Gc
    • Re: Peano's Axioms, MoeBlee
      • Re: Peano's Axioms, Gc
  • Re: Peano's Axioms, J. Burse
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Peano's Axioms, J. Burse
• Re: Indefinite Extensibility and Computationalism, LauLuna
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Indefinite Extensibility and Computationalism, LauLuna
  • Re: Indefinite Extensibility and Computationalism, Nam D. Nguyen
  • Re: Indefinite Extensibility and Computationalism, Nam D. Nguyen
    • Re: Indefinite Extensibility and Computationalism, MoeBlee
      • Re: Indefinite Extensibility and Computationalism, Nam D. Nguyen
      • Re: Indefinite Extensibility and Computationalism, MoeBlee
      • Re: Indefinite Extensibility and Computationalism, MoeBlee
      • Re: Indefinite Extensibility and Computationalism, Nam D. Nguyen
      • Message not available
      • Re: Indefinite Extensibility and Computationalism, MoeBlee
      • Re: Indefinite Extensibility and Computationalism, Nam D. Nguyen
      • Re: Indefinite Extensibility and Computationalism, MoeBlee
      • Re: Indefinite Extensibility and Computationalism, Nam D. Nguyen
      • Re: Indefinite Extensibility and Computationalism, MoeBlee
  • Re: Indefinite Extensibility and Computationalism, Nam D. Nguyen
    • Re: Indefinite Extensibility and Computationalism, Nam D. Nguyen
      • Re: Indefinite Extensibility and Computationalism, MoeBlee
    • Re: Indefinite Extensibility and Computationalism, MoeBlee
• Revising Separation:, Zaljohar
  • Re: Revising Separation:, Zaljohar
    • Re: Revising Separation:, Zaljohar
  • Re: Revising Separation:, Keith Ramsay
    • Re: Revising Separation:, Zaljohar
    • Re: Revising Separation:, Zaljohar
• [FAQ, 06/11/05] Mathematical logic on the web, Boris 'pi' Piwinger
• Re: Peano's second axiom., MoeBlee
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Peano's second axiom., MoeBlee
  • Re: Peano's second axiom., Zaljohar
    • Re: Peano's second axiom., MoeBlee
      • Re: Peano's second axiom., Zaljohar
      • Re: Peano's second axiom., MoeBlee
      • Re: Peano's second axiom., Zaljohar
      • Re: Peano's second axiom., MoeBlee
      • Re: Peano's second axiom., Zaljohar
  • Re: Peano's second axiom., Zaljohar
  • Re: Peano's second axiom., Zaljohar
    • Re: Peano's second axiom., MoeBlee
  • Re: Peano's second axiom., LauLuna
    • Re: Peano's second axiom., MoeBlee
      • Re: Peano's second axiom., LauLuna
      • Re: Peano's second axiom., MoeBlee
      • Re: Peano's second axiom., LauLuna
      • Re: Peano's second axiom., MoeBlee
    • Re: Peano's second axiom., Zaljohar
      • Re: Peano's second axiom., MoeBlee
      • Re: Peano's second axiom., Zaljohar
      • Re: Peano's second axiom., MoeBlee
      • Re: Peano's second axiom., Zaljohar
      • Re: Peano's second axiom., MoeBlee
  • Re: Peano's second axiom., Gc
    • Re: Peano's second axiom., Zaljohar
      • Re: Peano's second axiom., MoeBlee
      • Re: Peano's second axiom., Zaljohar
      • Re: Peano's second axiom., MoeBlee
  • Re: Peano's second axiom., Dan Christensen
    • Re: Peano's second axiom., Zaljohar
    • Re: Peano's second axiom., Zaljohar
      • Re: Peano's second axiom., Dan Christensen
      • Re: Peano's second axiom., Zaljohar

• Windows
• Science
• Usenet

• Archive
• About
• Privacy
• Search
• Imprint