Re: intuitionist logic
- From: Jack Campin - bogus address <bogus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2007 00:47:22 +0100
In intuitionistic logicHow ?
not not not a iff not a.
Fitch-style proof:
1 | ~~~A hyp
2 || A hyp
3 ||| ~A hyp
4 ||| A 2, reit
5 || ~~A 3-4, ~ int
6 || ~~~A 1, reit
7 | ~A 2-6, ~ int
8 ~~~A -> ~A 1-7, -> int
1 | ~A hyp
2 || ~~A hyp
3 || ~A 1, reit
4 |~~~A 2-3, ~ int
5 ~A -> ~~~A 1-4, -> int
============== j-c ====== @ ====== purr . demon . co . uk ==============
Jack Campin: 11 Third St, Newtongrange EH22 4PU, Scotland | tel 0131 660 4760
<http://www.purr.demon.co.uk/jack/> for CD-ROMs and free | fax 0870 0554 975
stuff: Scottish music, food intolerance, & Mac logic fonts | mob 07800 739 557
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: intuitionist logic
- From: david karapetyan
- Re: intuitionist logic
- From: Michal Przybylek
- Re: intuitionist logic
- References:
- intuitionist logic
- From: david karapetyan
- Re: intuitionist logic
- From: Frederick Williams
- Re: intuitionist logic
- From: Pummelo
- intuitionist logic
- Prev by Date: Re: Question: Given |X|>0 and |Y|>0, can X x Y be empty?
- Next by Date: Re: Does logic reasoning need quantifier?
- Previous by thread: Re: intuitionist logic
- Next by thread: Re: intuitionist logic
- Index(es):