Re: Question about the Diagonal Method.
- From: magidin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Arturo Magidin)
- Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2007 01:10:52 +0000 (UTC)
In article <1187217022.602400.209910@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
Scott <ToaTerra@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
You are correct. So let me change the example in an effort to be
clearer. For each x in N, let B_x = { x }. Let A = { x in N : B_x }.
(Hopefully this is better?)
No. It is still pure, unadulterated garbage and nonsense. While B_x
make sense, your "A" is nonsense.
--
======================================================================
"It's not denial. I'm just very selective about
what I accept as reality."
--- Calvin ("Calvin and Hobbes" by Bill Watterson)
======================================================================
Arturo Magidin
magidin-at-member-ams-org
.
- References:
- Question about the Diagonal Method.
- From: Scott
- Re: Question about the Diagonal Method.
- From: Scott
- Re: Question about the Diagonal Method.
- From: MoeBlee
- Re: Question about the Diagonal Method.
- From: Scott
- Question about the Diagonal Method.
- Prev by Date: Re: Question about the Diagonal Method.
- Next by Date: Continuum hypothesis
- Previous by thread: Re: Question about the Diagonal Method.
- Next by thread: Re: Question about the Diagonal Method.
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|