Re: Continuum hypothesis
- From: William Elliot <marsh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2007 01:11:29 -0700
On Thu, 16 Aug 2007, Peter_Smith wrote:
Well, to be pernickety, since CH can be formulated as a statement ofAre you responding to someone or starting a new thread on CH?
the language pure second-order logic, it *is* a statement of any
second-order theory whose language includes that of second-order logic
(including second-order arithmetic). Of course, some might well say
that that's just because second-order theories are just set theories
in disguise!
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Continuum hypothesis
- From: george
- Re: Continuum hypothesis
- References:
- Continuum hypothesis
- From: djrt20
- Re: Continuum hypothesis
- From: William Elliot
- Re: Continuum hypothesis
- From: Peter_Smith
- Continuum hypothesis
- Prev by Date: Re: Logical problem of evil
- Next by Date: Re: Continuum hypothesis
- Previous by thread: Re: Continuum hypothesis
- Next by thread: Re: Continuum hypothesis
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|