Re: Continuum hypothesis
- From: djrt20@xxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2007 12:30:37 -0700
On Aug 17, 4:00 pm, george <gree...@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Don't panic: simpler than you think. It is NOT a higher more
complicated kind
of number theory. It just means number theory USING FIRST-ORDER
LOGIC,
using syntax and semantics that are about numbers and sets (or
predicates) of
numbers, BUT NOT about Sets OF SETS of numbers (THAT would be *2nd*-
order arithmetic).
Hang on, wouldn't quantifying over sets of numbers put you in 2nd
order arithmetic?
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Continuum hypothesis
- From: george
- Re: Continuum hypothesis
- From: george
- Re: Continuum hypothesis
- References:
- Continuum hypothesis
- From: djrt20
- Re: Continuum hypothesis
- From: William Elliot
- Re: Continuum hypothesis
- From: djrt20
- Re: Continuum hypothesis
- From: William Elliot
- Re: Continuum hypothesis
- From: djrt20
- Re: Continuum hypothesis
- From: William Elliot
- Re: Continuum hypothesis
- From: george
- Continuum hypothesis
- Prev by Date: Need recommendations
- Next by Date: Re: Continuum hypothesis
- Previous by thread: Re: Continuum hypothesis
- Next by thread: Re: Continuum hypothesis
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|