Re: Continuum hypothesis
- From: george <greeneg@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2007 08:53:27 -0700
On Aug 20, 11:39 am, stevendaryl3...@xxxxxxxxx (Daryl McCullough)
wrote:
Bell's Theorem proves that no measurable function f can possible
satisfy this constraint. However, Pitowsky proved that if one
assumes the continuum hypothesis, one can construct a nonmeasurable
function that satisfies this constraint.
One line of the truth table still has not been completed here.
If one DENIES the continuum hypothesis, can there still
exist a NON-constructible nonmeasurable function that
satisfies the constraint? Or is the truth of the CH necessary
to the existence of the non-measurable function at all (regardless
of whether it can be proven to exist)?
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Continuum hypothesis
- From: Alan Smaill
- Re: Continuum hypothesis
- References:
- Continuum hypothesis
- From: djrt20
- Re: Continuum hypothesis
- From: aatu . koskensilta
- Re: Continuum hypothesis
- From: Daryl McCullough
- Continuum hypothesis
- Prev by Date: Re: Continuum hypothesis
- Next by Date: Re: Continuum hypothesis
- Previous by thread: Re: Continuum hypothesis
- Next by thread: Re: Continuum hypothesis
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|