Re: Scott and George's Teaching Thread
- From: MoeBlee <jazzmobe@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2007 14:40:57 -0700
On Aug 27, 1:34 pm, Scott <ToaTe...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
The notation "U c V =df Ax[xeU -> xeV]" is a notation used strictly
for readability, which means everywhere I see "UcV" I should replace
with "Ax[xeU -> xeV]"; eg, UcVcW is equivalent to Ax[xeU -> xeV ->
xeW]. Correct?
No. '->' is not associative. That's something that you would know
right down to your bones if you had your basic logic skills in order.
I just don't understand why you don't want to get a good textbook on
first order logic. I'm sincere; it would help me understand if would
you tell me why you don't want to do that.
MoeBlee
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Scott and George's Teaching Thread
- From: Scott
- Re: Scott and George's Teaching Thread
- From: george
- Re: Scott and George's Teaching Thread
- References:
- Scott and George's Teaching Thread
- From: Scott
- Re: Scott and George's Teaching Thread
- From: Scott
- Re: Scott and George's Teaching Thread
- From: george
- Re: Scott and George's Teaching Thread
- From: Scott
- Re: Scott and George's Teaching Thread
- From: george
- Re: Scott and George's Teaching Thread
- From: Scott
- Re: Scott and George's Teaching Thread
- From: MoeBlee
- Re: Scott and George's Teaching Thread
- From: george
- Re: Scott and George's Teaching Thread
- From: Scott
- Scott and George's Teaching Thread
- Prev by Date: Re: Scott and George's Teaching Thread
- Next by Date: Re: Scott and George's Teaching Thread
- Previous by thread: Re: Scott and George's Teaching Thread
- Next by thread: Re: Scott and George's Teaching Thread
- Index(es):